With this engine that could eventually halve world wide oil consumption, the Israelis will break Saudi Arabia's "Rice bowl," so we can expect the Saudis to do everything possible to stop them.
1 posted on
04/29/2016 10:51:22 AM PDT by
DJ Taylor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: DJ Taylor
So, if I stick that magnet gizmo on the fuel line, I could triple the miles?
To: DJ Taylor
I understand that terms develop specific meanings but if the fuel is ignited within a cylinder, isn't it still an internal combustion engine?
To: DJ Taylor
4 posted on
04/29/2016 10:56:54 AM PDT by
Squantos
( Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet ...)
To: DJ Taylor
——to turn the valves that move the wheels-—
but does the author know anything about which he writes?
5 posted on
04/29/2016 10:57:26 AM PDT by
bert
((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;+12, 73, ....)
To: DJ Taylor
No, no, no, no!
The goal is to ELIMINATE personal freedom, mobility, and independence!
“Progressives” want to END IT, NOT MEND IT!
6 posted on
04/29/2016 10:57:33 AM PDT by
G Larry
(ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS impose SLAVE WAGES on LEGAL Immigrants.)
To: DJ Taylor
It sounds like a hybrid, but one that might actually work.
7 posted on
04/29/2016 10:57:51 AM PDT by
Telepathic Intruder
(The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
To: DJ Taylor
These miracle technology stories come out of Israel every once in a while. A few months ago it was a cure for cancer.
They usually sink like a stone. Last you’ll ever hear of it.
Be nice to be wrong. Not counting on it.
8 posted on
04/29/2016 10:57:59 AM PDT by
Steely Tom
(Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
To: DJ Taylor
This sounds like an awesome investment opportunity. Sure wish I had some money to do just that.
9 posted on
04/29/2016 10:58:00 AM PDT by
PrairieLady2
(Choose Cruz...and looze.)
To: DJ Taylor
Remember when the Wankel rotary engine was going to be the wave of the future? Is this another untried engine that will be a disappointment?
10 posted on
04/29/2016 10:59:17 AM PDT by
JimRed
(Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
To: DJ Taylor
The notoriously conservative car business autos, after all, are still largely powered by the internal combustion engine, developed nearly 150 years ago
What a colossally stupid line. We could also say
"The notoriously conservative house business -- houses, after all, are still largely structured by a foundation, walls and a roof, developed hundreds of years ago."
"The notoriously conservative gun business -- guns, after all, are still largely structured by lead and gunpowder, developed hundreds of years ago."
"The notoriously conservative chair business -- chairs, after all, are still largely structured by four legs and a seat, developed hundreds of years ago."
I wish the car industry were more conservative, then I could get a full-sized car with a straight bench seat and no stupid computer powered security systems and electric windows that don't work when the car is off.
13 posted on
04/29/2016 11:03:14 AM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
("There is no limit to the amount of good you can do if you don't care who gets the credit."-R.Reagan)
To: DJ Taylor
Bull pucky “pie in the sky” investment scam.
To: DJ Taylor
So, ah, a lawnmower engine pushing a generator? That better be one BIG piston because the power needed to push a car around will require a pretty damn heavy gen.
16 posted on
04/29/2016 11:05:29 AM PDT by
TalBlack
(Evil doesn't have a day job....)
To: DJ Taylor; sully777; vigl; Cagey; Abathar; A. Patriot; B Knotts; getsoutalive; muleskinner; ...
Engine Ping!.......................
17 posted on
04/29/2016 11:05:48 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(WE DON'T NEED NO STEENKING TAGLINES!...........................)
To: DJ Taylor
19 posted on
04/29/2016 11:07:55 AM PDT by
patlin
("Knowledgee chosen to participate inthat is - 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
To: DJ Taylor
20 posted on
04/29/2016 11:08:07 AM PDT by
McGruff
(Denial ain't just a river in Egypt - Mark Twain)
To: All
If it were strictly up to industry, there might be some hesitation but in this case, it is not up to industry, but to government, which has mandated a sharp drop in emissions for vehicles by 2020.
I read the article enthusiastically until the very last sentence. Then I got a bad feeling for some reason.
22 posted on
04/29/2016 11:08:14 AM PDT by
mmichaels1970
(Hillary lied over four coffins.)
To: DJ Taylor
Looks like they improved the Wankel engine.
23 posted on
04/29/2016 11:08:20 AM PDT by
rawcatslyentist
(Genesis 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed,)
To: DJ Taylor
Without some sort of diagram I call BS.
25 posted on
04/29/2016 11:12:19 AM PDT by
MarineBrat
(Better dead than red!)
To: DJ Taylor
To: DJ Taylor
If it were strictly up to industry, there might be some hesitation but in this case, it is not up to industry, but to government," He's got that bass ackwards. If there is profit to be made, private industry would be the best vehicle to advance this technology.
32 posted on
04/29/2016 11:19:20 AM PDT by
IronJack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson