Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/16/2016 9:38:54 AM PDT by Dana1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: Dana1960

Colorado Republican can find out where your party leadership lives. Probably inside some gated community. Just saying.....


2 posted on 04/16/2016 9:42:41 AM PDT by Newbomb Turk (Hey Newbomb, where's your brothers ElCamino ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960


3 posted on 04/16/2016 9:43:55 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

If Colorado republicans want to change the rules by legit procedures go ahead for 2020.

It’s wrong to know the rules fail by the rules and then complain after you don’t get the results you want.

Thousands of people voted for the Cruz delegates this year by the rules.

Trump is the one trying to cheat


4 posted on 04/16/2016 9:44:14 AM PDT by lonestar67 (Trump is anti-conservative / Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

My thoughts are that it is a very bad policy. But the State can change it. I am not in favor of compelling States to change their laws through coercing them, but through the ballot box. It’s called States Right to Govern.

The question of how power should be divided between the federal government and the states is really what American politics has been all about for well over two centuries. It is a question debated by delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787, debated by Federalists and Anti-Federalists during the ratification period, and debated between and within our political parties ever since. Elections have been won and lost on this question, and a Civil War fought over it.


5 posted on 04/16/2016 9:44:34 AM PDT by jessduntno (The mind of a liberal...deceit, desire for control, greed, contradiction and fueled by hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

That reallt says a lot about who the CO GOPe wanted for the republican nominee for president...It was rigged for their private selection...

Why didn’t they use this method for the Republican presidential primary/caucus????

The Democrats held a popular vote caucus...Why didn’t the GOPe of Colorado????


6 posted on 04/16/2016 9:45:37 AM PDT by JBW1949
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960
Just following the rules as they were written


10 posted on 04/16/2016 9:54:39 AM PDT by Donglalinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

Voting by mail... What an asinine way to vote.


12 posted on 04/16/2016 9:57:28 AM PDT by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

Were you complaining about Colorado Caucus process in 1912 when it began?

Did you ever care that Straw Votes were never binding?


13 posted on 04/16/2016 9:57:42 AM PDT by G Larry (ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS impose SLAVE WAGES on LEGAL Immigrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960
This is true, but there's one catch: The candidates that are available on the primary ballots have already been prefiltered at the county assemlbies (for county offices), the state convention (governor), etc. (In some cases, candidates can petition onto the primary ballot—if they have the necessary ground forces.)

For example, if there are two Republican candidates for U.S. House in your congressional district, and if only one of them got more than 30% at the congressional district assembly (a several hundred mile road trip, in my case), then there will be nothing on the primary ballot for that office. Only those who drove across the state to vote will have had any say.

This is not as bad as the presidential primary, but this means that the caucus-assembly-convention system is still reducing (though not entirely eliminating) the influence of the rank-and-file voters.

14 posted on 04/16/2016 9:58:09 AM PDT by snarkpup (I want a government small enough that my main concern in life doesn't need to be who's running it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

Why do you not go ask them.

They have web sites.

They have facebook pages.

It really isn’t that hard.

http://www.jeffcorepublicans.com/index.php/en/caucus-information


17 posted on 04/16/2016 9:59:40 AM PDT by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

This proves without a doubt, the rules changes in the Presidential
whatever you call it, were rigged against Trump.


21 posted on 04/16/2016 10:02:58 AM PDT by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

Just another reminder that a political party can nominate whoever it wants by whatever means it pleases.

If you don’t like what a party is doing, don’t participate in its primary and don’t vote for its nominees.


23 posted on 04/16/2016 10:03:47 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Ride To The Sound Of The Guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

Colorado?

Bush’s fault!


26 posted on 04/16/2016 10:04:49 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

Since Colorado, Trump’s numbers have shot up while Cruz is tumbling. The American public has spoken.


29 posted on 04/16/2016 10:06:17 AM PDT by JonPreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

Cruz: “I am the king of voterless states!”™


30 posted on 04/16/2016 10:06:19 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

Chris Christie upset the apple cart in the last Colorado governor election so some tea party people got elected to much of the republican party. Some rules were changed to try to make things run better.

I would like to see some rules to stop electing turncoats that say one thing to get elected then turn their backs on the people.


32 posted on 04/16/2016 10:06:44 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

http://www.weeklystandard.com/jeb-colorado-establishment-favored-gop-primary/article/2001932


36 posted on 04/16/2016 10:10:18 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

It’s sad to think that the same professional political types who write these rules for delegate selection are basically the same people who helped develop the Internal Revenue Code into what it is today. And they probably still wonder why so many people are voting against the establishment.


72 posted on 04/16/2016 10:46:56 AM PDT by Bernard (The Road To Hell Is Not Paved With Good Results)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960
This is too much like Democrats for me. Wanting a "do over" or recount, until "their" guy wins.

Let it go. If you can win the nomination, do so.

77 posted on 04/16/2016 10:58:30 AM PDT by KC Burke (Consider all of my posts as first drafts. (Apologies to L. Niven))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dana1960

I think that Colorado republicans should write in “Donald Trump” for every office from dog catcher on up as a protest vote.


79 posted on 04/16/2016 11:02:52 AM PDT by WMarshal (Hey GOP &#9581;&#8745;&#9582;(&#927;_&#927;)&#9581;&#8745;&#9582;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson