1 posted on
04/06/2016 4:27:17 PM PDT by
drewh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: drewh
Is Roberts name ion that book, is a candidates names in the book, or are there quite a few in government in that book?
Just release the names to the press.
2 posted on
04/06/2016 4:30:21 PM PDT by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: drewh
Trump is on the list. Prove me wrong.
3 posted on
04/06/2016 4:31:06 PM PDT by
kik5150
(Cruz argued 9 times before Supreme Court judges. Trump argues with beauty pageant judges.)
To: drewh
Here you are doing your smear spreading again.
4 posted on
04/06/2016 4:31:27 PM PDT by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: drewh
Why is that person under a restraining order?
8 posted on
04/06/2016 4:36:36 PM PDT by
wastedyears
(Iron Maiden March 30th @ Madison Square Garden.)
To: drewh
Sibley has been promising to release names since 2007, when he was going to appear on 20/20. Then he was running for President in 2012. Then he was going to release them again. He’s a loon.
10 posted on
04/06/2016 4:37:57 PM PDT by
mak5
To: drewh
You can post this til the cows come home and no one will believe it. Just like NE story. Wouldn’t you rather see your guy win on merit rather than on politics of personal destruction?
11 posted on
04/06/2016 4:38:04 PM PDT by
libbylu
(Cruz: The truth with a smile.)
To: drewh
The courts are corrupt. They are protecting the our rulers.
16 posted on
04/06/2016 4:44:02 PM PDT by
stockpirate
(Rush is a low information talk show host concerning Ted sCruz and Marco foamboy Rubio.)
To: drewh
Roberts and Cruz probably did tag teams. No way would Roberts want that out.
19 posted on
04/06/2016 4:51:15 PM PDT by
napscoordinator
(Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
To: All
Hey Obama, when are you going to release all those papers?
Oh! Wrong thread.
This is Ted.
Yea Ted. Hide all those papers!
23 posted on
04/06/2016 5:00:10 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
To: drewh
remember this word..... “sandbagging”....
no real dirt on Cruz will be allowed until he’s done what he being used for...which is to take out Trump
There sandbagging anything on Cruz till the time that they needed take to need to take him out
25 posted on
04/06/2016 5:02:33 PM PDT by
tophat9000
(King G(OP)eorge III has no idea why the Americans are in rebellion... teach him why)
To: drewh
34 posted on
04/06/2016 5:34:32 PM PDT by
pookie18
(7 months until the general election...)
To: drewh
Awww, another unsubstantiated sleaze thread about Cruz, from people who support a self professed adulterer. How nice.......
Please keep it up........because it will do nothing but continue to destroy Trump's standing with Americans.
41 posted on
04/06/2016 6:45:44 PM PDT by
TXSearcher
(The anti-RINO rebellion is being won by a NY RINO.......truth IS stranger than fiction.)
To: drewh
I doubt it was Cruz... for one thing the lawyer is a liberal hater - and liberals don’t hate Cruz.
43 posted on
04/06/2016 6:54:50 PM PDT by
GOPJ
("Should a Jewish baker be forced to bake a cake for a Nazi wedding?" John Stossel)
To: All
Is there a reason why anyone would trust the names in a pimp’s book?
To: drewh
BAD NEWS FOR TED: Supreme Court Adds DC Madam Case To Official DocketHow is that bad news for Ted Cruz?
48 posted on
04/06/2016 7:48:26 PM PDT by
Hoodat
(Article 4, Section 4)
To: drewh
Maybe someone can “steal” them and release them. We need to see
To: drewh
Uh the files were already leaked online and Cruz’s number wasn’t on there. So it has to be someone else.
52 posted on
04/06/2016 8:23:04 PM PDT by
for-q-clinton
(If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
To: drewh
Sibley's application was directed to Chief Justice John Roberts,...Roberts denied it without seeking a response from any other party,
Uh huh! Roberts' name is in there, bet the farm on it! One of the (many) reasons he rewrote Obamacare!
To: drewh
Shoulda looked like this:
Sibley's application was directed to Chief Justice John Roberts,...Roberts denied it without seeking a response from any other party,...
Uh huh! Roberts' name is in there, bet the farm on it! One of the (many) reasons he rewrote Obamacare!
To: drewh
{shrug}
It’s not like those lists of phone numbers aren’t already all over them inerweb thingees alGore invented.
That must be very exciting for whoever happens to be on the end of those numbers... assuming they’re still breathing.
76 posted on
04/07/2016 11:28:28 AM PDT by
HLPhat
(It takes a Republic TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS - not a populist Tyranny of the Majority)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson