Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jackie Mason: Hillary Has More FBI Agents Following Her than Delegates
Breitbart ^ | 4/5/16

Posted on 04/06/2016 2:12:17 AM PDT by markomalley

Hillary Clinton has more FBI agents following her than she has delegates, joked comic legend Jackie Mason in a radio interview on Sunday.

Mason was responding to a recently corrected Washington Post news article that first cited a lawmaker briefed by FBI Director James B. Comey as saying the FBI assigned 147 agents to investigate Clinton’s private emails.

“Two U.S. law enforcement officials have since told The Washington Post that figure is too high,” reads the correction. “The FBI will not provide an exact figure, but the officials say the number of FBI personnel involved is fewer than 50.”

But that didn’t stop Mason from jesting about the subject during his regular segment on “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio,” the popular weekend talk radio program broadcast on New York’s AM 970 The Answer and NewsTalk 990 AM in Philadelphia. Klein doubles as Breitbart’s senior investigative reporter and Jerusalem bureau chief.

Mason stated, “She has more FBI agents following her than she does have delegates. If all the FBI agents were delegates, she would have been elected twenty minutes ago.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; arkansas; election2016; fbi; hillary; hillaryclinton; hitlery; jackiemason; newyork; wipewater

1 posted on 04/06/2016 2:12:17 AM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

LOL...he has a way wit wurds


2 posted on 04/06/2016 2:14:29 AM PDT by Doogle (( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon sThailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle; markomalley

Indeed. And long overdue levity.


3 posted on 04/06/2016 2:16:05 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Jackie is a funny man, and great humor always has an element of truth. In this case it’s the whole truth. She needs to be very afraid after her showing in Wisconsin.


4 posted on 04/06/2016 2:17:08 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

The fear came out when she was on Meet The Press Sunday following the news of the legal strategy of four of her aides that was exposed on Friday.


5 posted on 04/06/2016 2:43:04 AM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Thanks markomalley.

6 posted on 04/06/2016 2:54:38 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

That too, but if she can secure the nomination they won’t touch her. If she loses the nomination they will indict her.


7 posted on 04/06/2016 3:08:27 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

I don’t think she’ll make it to the convention. Once the details of the other prong of the FBI investigation start to leak out (racketeering), Trump will excoriate her. The media hounds will attack Trump and the whole thing will go nuclear.

Sanders, if he has have half a brain, should go for Hillary’s jugular at that point. Whether he knows it or not, he has the nomination if the party doesn’t do a substitute for Hillary.


8 posted on 04/06/2016 3:31:17 AM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

It looks to me like the administration is allowing her to twist in the wind...


9 posted on 04/06/2016 8:50:27 AM PDT by GOPJ ("We have the fight of our lives coming up to save our nation!" ~ Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Probably so, but they have to have the appearance of standing by her for now, though I suspect if she wins the nomination for the Party they will not prosecute her. There is obviously no love lost between the Clintons and the Obamas, but for Party sake they are in a wait and see mode for now. They may even give her immunity from prosecution, but only because party elders will demand it. That may be why the FBI has been dragging their feet, to see if a Republican can win the White House.


10 posted on 04/06/2016 9:22:10 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

The FBI’s honorable. They know they’re in the fight of their lives if they bring charges against Clinton. My guess is the extra time spent is to make sure every “i” is dotted and every “t” crossed.


11 posted on 04/06/2016 12:28:36 PM PDT by GOPJ ("Should a Jewish baker be forced to bake a cake for a Nazi wedding?" John Stossel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
The FBI’s honorable.

Not even speaking to their honor, more the lack of honor with this administration. They might be thinking that the administration will just give her immunity, so they are holding off for now.

12 posted on 04/06/2016 1:52:29 PM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

I don’t believe Comey’s making political decision with this case. If he’s got the facts and a case he’ll move on it. If not, he won’t.


13 posted on 04/06/2016 6:42:19 PM PDT by GOPJ ("Should a Jewish baker be forced to bake a cake for a Nazi wedding?" John Stossel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
Again, I am talking about the Administration.

The FBI only recommends, it then is up to the Justice Department to bring an indictment. So you are correct James Comey will not hold back due to political considerations.

Except perhaps as to which political party is more likely to follow through, or worse, may provide her immunity from prosecution.

That was my point.

14 posted on 04/06/2016 8:45:45 PM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
Ahh, I get what you're saying... we're basically on the same side with this issue. Thanks for clarifying...
15 posted on 04/07/2016 8:08:33 AM PDT by GOPJ ("Should a Jewish baker be forced to bake a cake for a Nazi wedding?" John Stossel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Effective communication is not one of my strong points, LOL.


16 posted on 04/07/2016 8:15:06 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson