Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump refuses to rule out third-party run if he doesn’t land GOP nomination
NY Daily News ^ | April 4, 2016 | Adam Edelman

Posted on 04/04/2016 6:48:46 AM PDT by xzins

Donald Trump continued his war with party bosses Sunday, once again saying that he wouldn’t rule out a third-party run if he failed to secure the GOP nomination and demanding that rival John Kasich drop out of the race.

“We’re going to have to see how I was treated. I’m going to have to see how I was treated. Very simple,” Trump said on “Fox News Sunday” when asked if he would categorically rule out running as a third-party independent candidate if he failed to win his party’s nomination. “It’s not a question of win or lose. It’s a question of treatment. I want to be treated fair.”

The comments came just days after Trump, Kasich and Ted Cruz backed out of pledges to support the GOP’s eventual nominee. Following the walk-backs, Trump met privately with Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus in an apparent effort to smooth things over, but on Sunday, the hot-and-cold relationship appeared on the verge of fracturing once again.

“Those kinds of comments, I think, have consequences,” Priebus said on ABC’s “This Week” of Trump’s latest remarks. “When you make those kinds of comments, and you want people to fall in line for you, it makes it more difficult.”

In yet another interview, Priebus admitted he wasn’t sure whether he felt the former businessman was the party’s best candidate.

“I don’t know,” Priebus said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “Listen, I don’t worry about who is the strongest candidate.”

Further suggesting Trump was undeterred by the criticism were demands he made during a rally in Wisconsin — whose pivotal primary on Tuesday will put for up grabs another 96 delegates — that Kasich drop out of the GOP race.

(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; bloomberglooksbetter; buffooninchief; bullmoose2016; election2016; emptysuitemptythreat; gope; iamavictim; iammistreated; madampresident; newyork; rossperot2016; thirdparty; trump; trump5point0; trumpextortion; trumpsnature
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-280 next last
To: xzins
My purpose in supporting him would be indeed to kill the republican party...at a minimum to kill it as it currently exists.

So you understand how ridiculous it would be for any Trump supporter to argue that anyone should support Trump to prevent Hillary from being elected - since Trump supporters quite regularly proclaim that if Trump is not the nominee, not only will they not vote for the GOP nominee for president, but many will vote for Dems at all levels. It seems that Trump supporters are fine with Hillary winning and having a Dem Congress if Trump is not the nominee, but become scandalized that others would be fine with Hillary winning and having a GOP congress if Trump does get the nomination.

101 posted on 04/04/2016 7:25:00 AM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

The GOPe THINKS they are going to get Slick Willie’s nagging, screeching wife.

But this could backfire and they could end up Feeling the Bern instead.

Now watching THAT could be FUN!!


102 posted on 04/04/2016 7:25:14 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Go away Trump, go run 3rd party.

There are too many sore loser laws on the books for him to do this now that he’s run as a Republicans. Trump knows he can’t mount a real 3rd party bid at this point, he is just lying/bluffing/BSing - as usual.

Too bad the RNC didn’t call his bluff from day one. Trump has no path to a general election victory and simply used the Republican Part to boost his brand. So I hope the orange face clown with raccoon eyes goes away. At least lay off the spray tanner, he might not look so ridiculous.


103 posted on 04/04/2016 7:27:05 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ontap

Not picking someone who gets far and away the most votes is a big FU to the plurality of voters who support Trump, and will be the death of the GOP. It just shows how much the party despises the voters. I’ve voted solid GOP for 36 years but this is their last chance as far as I’m concerned. And I’m not alone.


104 posted on 04/04/2016 7:28:47 AM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
RE:”Will you still be calling to Dump Trump! on April 26th when Ted Cruz is mathematically eliminated from the race due to the numerical impossibility of getting enough delegates?”

No one will be mathematically eliminated until someone gets the 1237 delegates.

If no-one gets that its a whole new ball game, he can fight for them like everyone else does.

Trump should have read the rules before he committed to them, as if his commitments mean ANYTHING anyway.

105 posted on 04/04/2016 7:29:10 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Trumpetir :"He could go on a shooting spree downtown and I would still worship him"')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline

Indeed. But only for Republicans. The Democrats are as cohesive as ever.

I will offer one observation about the three who backed out however. Trump refused to make the pledge in the first place. Then he made it when it seemed useful to him and backed out when it did not. Cruz and Kasich waivered only as to Trump. I don’t think they’d refuse to support each other. But Trump won’t support anyone except himself, which suggests that he really doesn’t have any allegience to the Party. He’s basically a parasite who wants the benefits of party affiliation without offering anything in exchange.


106 posted on 04/04/2016 7:29:17 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

The US Constitution spells out who can run for Federal office and what qualifications are for them. It is the Supreme law and nothing a state adds as a limiting qualification is valid.

So your Sore Loser laws can apply to State elections but not federal where the US Const controls.


107 posted on 04/04/2016 7:29:55 AM PDT by Mechanicos (Attend a Trump Rally and get to "Punch a Commie for Mommy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Why not? Trump could have run as a democrat with similar results. He believes National Security, Education, and Healthcare are the top three roles for the federal government.


108 posted on 04/04/2016 7:30:02 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjam22

I don’t think so.

He’s a builder. He likes to see ACTUAL results.

He’d see a viable 3rd party as an actual result.


109 posted on 04/04/2016 7:30:45 AM PDT by xzins (Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

I think you have it exactly backwards.

Many lifetime republicans are ready to jump ship for good. They are that disgusted with the Republican party.


110 posted on 04/04/2016 7:31:53 AM PDT by crusher2013 (8Liberalism is Aristocracy masquerading as equality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I think it's a lot harder for a 3rd party or independent candidate to get on the ballot than a major party nominee.

They have to gather signatures for petitions, which wouldn't be a problem for Trump from a numbers standpoint; but having to develop teams to navigate all 50 states would be tricky to ramp up in a few months.

The key date to watch is May 9th. That's the deadline to get on the Texas ballot; a state that would seemingly be crucial to a Trump Independent campaign.

111 posted on 04/04/2016 7:32:09 AM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Change your screen name. That word actually means something.


112 posted on 04/04/2016 7:33:28 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: xzins
If he’s not treated fairly (in my opinion), and if he has a solid plan to win ELECTORAL votes, then I will support Trump in a 3rd party run virtually guaranteeing that sHrillary wins the Whitehouse. Fixed it for you
113 posted on 04/04/2016 7:33:41 AM PDT by verga (Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

If Cruz is really devoted to stopping Hillary, HE’s the one who should drop out and throw his support to Trump.

But because he and his supporters are in the middle of a temper tantrum, he won’t. At this time, they hate Trump more than they love their country.


114 posted on 04/04/2016 7:35:24 AM PDT by Luircin (Supervillians for Trump: We're sick of being the lesser evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Yes, He should focus on getting ballot access of some variety in all 50 states. He’d need a team of lawyers devoted to each large state, and a smaller group for smaller states.

I believe he’s a former Reform Party member, and their platform is already supportive of most everything he stands for.

He could easily assume the mantle of the Reform Party.

He should establish 50 state teams to run candidates in every House and Senate seat to the best of their ability.


115 posted on 04/04/2016 7:35:52 AM PDT by xzins (Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Mechanicos

Excellent, good to hear that, tell the orange faced buffoon to go run 3rd party again. The faster he exits the GOP and takes his clown show elsewhere, the better.


116 posted on 04/04/2016 7:36:10 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

Hillary appreciates your support.


117 posted on 04/04/2016 7:37:29 AM PDT by Mechanicos (Attend a Trump Rally and get to "Punch a Commie for Mommy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: verga

Big frigging deal.

Anyone except Trump is identical to Hillary in the long run. Goodbye USA, goodbye conservatism in the long run.

The only difference is the self-righteous preening of the local twits and who gets blamed for it.

End of story.


118 posted on 04/04/2016 7:37:53 AM PDT by Luircin (Supervillians for Trump: We're sick of being the lesser evil!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: verga

She’ll win anyway against anything the republicats put up.

Do you honestly think a liberal bush, a liberal ryan, or even a Canadian Texan can beat Hillary once the media starts up with Queen Hillary music?


119 posted on 04/04/2016 7:38:30 AM PDT by xzins (Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Several candidates already said they won’t support Trump if he wins the nomination. So are they allowed to break the pledge but not Trump. The rules of the pledge was to treat him fairly. They already broke those rules.


120 posted on 04/04/2016 7:39:14 AM PDT by castlegreyskull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-280 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson