Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Interview with a Candy Wrapper
https://avengersocial.wordpress.com ^ | March 26, 2016 | AvengerSocial

Posted on 03/26/2016 9:30:12 AM PDT by NKP_Vet

It’s not often, I do a story myself. I have a team writers so I don’t have to. This leaves me the freedom to investigate and track leads. But this story is so hot, I felt I should do this one.

If you have been on twitter #cruzsexscandal has been over the top and widely circulated but let’s not forget the anonymous video released that promised if Cruz did not drop out his dirty secrets would come out. I can say this day has come, given the release from the National Enquirer. But Avenger has a leg up on everyone. Our anonymous source found one of the alleged escorts who Ted Cruz frequented. Her picture released in our previous story is not how she looks today. Let’s call her Jane Doe.

We were given the exclusive interview done by the detective that found her. We will not disclose her real identity nor her location, since the initial leak she has gone off the radar. She was found in a West Texas trailer park after a former escort feared that she would too become part of this drama and gave up her location. As promised, both identities are strictly confidential and shall remain anonymous. For now, we are just releasing some parts of this explosive transcript. An excerpt of his interview with our Jane Doe is transcribed below. Be forewarned it’s explosive. While we believe 100% that is true, we’re are advised to refer to the statements below as allegations. I do have the video of this conversation. Our job is to shed light and not to master.

Detective: As agreed during our interview, your identity and location will be kept secret, as sworn and recorded. When, did you first meet Ted Cruz?

Jane Doe: 2004, I was 18 and my regular client in Dallas gave him the contact. It is not unusual for this to happen, many clients for the service I worked with are lobbyist, donors, attorneys and politicians. That is why, I am scared for my life that you found me.

Detective: I will not disclose any location or your true identity, I found you because one of your former clients gave me the information. That led me to one of your associates that brought me here. I did this because if I can find you, others can as well. This interview is only to assure you are who they say you are. Your face will be not shown, nothing will be asked to directly identify you.

Detective: Did Ted Cruz ever tell you he was married? Jane Doe: Some clients do and some do not, he never said anything about being married. He seemed to need mothering of some sort, before we engaged in some of his requested acts.

Detective: Requested acts?

Jane Doe: sometimes I would dress as a catholic school girl for role play, that is popular with many clients though. Other times he would request for me to dress like a judge.

Detective: I see, so would you say he is odd than other clients?

Jane Doe: Who am I to judge my clients? I just do what, I am paid for and go on my way.

Detective: What locations would you meet him?

Jane Doe: Houston/Dallas and I have been to Alexandria as well.

Detective: Virginia?

Jane Doe: Yes

Detective: How many times would he visit you within a week?

Jane Doe: In the beginning, it was every time he had business in either of the locations. He would even pay for my flights to Baltimore then rent a car for me to drive to Alexandria.

Detective: Have you ever seen his wife?

Jane Doe: Yes, many times were close calls. I guess that is why I am terrified how I was found.

Detective: I only found you because of your friend/associate. I think she is about to leave as well.

Jane Doe: After this, I will have to move again. I am leaving Texas and I wished I had never met him. I never experienced this kind of problem as an escort. I knew, when he said he was going to run for president that I would be at risk. As a senator, I was not worried. I have met many politicians doing this service but never had my life been at risk.

Detective: You have my contact so you can reach me if you need help. Let’s get back to talking about Ted more.

Did anyone give you a specific phone at any time for contact?

Jane Doe: Yes, until recently. I was getting weird calls with no way to call it back. The number would be local and I would answer to silence. None of the calls were of the same number, so I threw away the phone. Detective: So, you are saying this is why you feel threatened?

Has he ever called you recently?

Jane Doe: Yes, it is why I feel threatened and No, he has not called since January. This is when all the strange calls started.

At this time, we are deciding to either pass this on to syndicated publication or what are our legal options. We will update once a decision is made.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cruz; cruzmistresscrises; cubanmistresscrises; elections; sexscandal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum

As I have already pointed out, no Cruz defenders are stepping forward to say that Cruz would not be doing these things. No, there’s no solid proof, yet, but why aren’t Cruz supporters willing to go out on a limb and vouch for their guy? Is it because you are afraid these stories are true?


41 posted on 03/26/2016 9:56:54 AM PDT by GLDNGUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cats Pajamas

Yes, and that gal was from Houston....


42 posted on 03/26/2016 9:57:28 AM PDT by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

The way these next three affair girls describe Ted droning on and on in an autistic way sounds like him. Sapiosexual. I had to look it up, and was dismayed to find that I am one.


43 posted on 03/26/2016 10:00:57 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Cats Pajamas

I had forgotten about Ted firing the porn star.


Did he fire her in person?


44 posted on 03/26/2016 10:02:26 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: shalom aleichem
Do you not recall Anthony “Carlos Danger” Wiener and Bill Clinton vehemently DENYING the sex allegations!?

Exactly. Good post.

45 posted on 03/26/2016 10:07:20 AM PDT by Mr Apple ( AS OF MARCH 25, 2016.....IT'S PRESIDENT TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
[...] GOP establishment mainstream media complex [...] They are the real enemy.

I've noticed that none of my browsers now consider Trumpster or Cruzbot to be misspelled words, they are enabling our fighting, hoping that we take ourselves out.

Hillary must smile every single time we dehumanize our opponents with name calling. Trump or Cruz, let's get it done, and give a big whopping black eye to the GOPe and actually win the White House.

46 posted on 03/26/2016 10:09:12 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
...not to mention the arrogance of Hart naming his floating bordello “Monkey Business”. Reporters searched for monkey business and lo and behold! There they were.

Older than that were the antics of Wilbur Mills (D) and the stripper Fannie Foxx in a late night Washington DC fountain romp ala the film La Vita Dolce..,well actually it was more mundane than that. Mills was stopped at 2am or so on suspicion of drunk driving, Mills attempted to flee and fell into a fountain.

good times...good times

;>)

47 posted on 03/26/2016 10:09:23 AM PDT by Covenantor (Men are ruled...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern. " Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

It is not so simple.

Whenever a candidate answers allegations, more questions get asked. It gets a candidate on the defense and off message.

Lawsuits are useless. Freedom of press is a basic right. They have real people, making real claims. They also can legally choose to NOT disclose who the sources are. And going after the sources will be perceived as persecution and oppression regardless of whether there is any substance to the claims. If these people retract their statements, a dozen more will step forward to make similar claims.

It’s like saying a candidate must apologize for something. Whenever they apologize, the complaint never goes away. It just makes it worse. Next they call for the candidate to drop out.


48 posted on 03/26/2016 10:11:00 AM PDT by unlearner (RIP America, 7/4/1776 - 6/26/2015, "Only God can judge us now." - Claus Von Stauffenberg / Valkyrie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 20yearsofinternet

http://www.dailywire.com/news/4406/5-things-you-need-know-about-cruzsexscandal-ben-shapiro


49 posted on 03/26/2016 10:11:51 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
At least she wasn't from Nantucket.
50 posted on 03/26/2016 10:13:54 AM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

http://nypost.com/2016/02/12/ted-cruz-yanks-ad-featuring-porn-star/

Ted Cruz yanks ad featuring porn star

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3443481/Ted-Cruz-campaigns-quickly-pulls-Conservatives-Anonymous-ad-emerges-stars-softcore-porn-actress.html


51 posted on 03/26/2016 10:15:20 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: catnipman
It's a legitimate issue if it affects how people perceive a candidate and how folks vote. If you read through the threads, what most people are having trouble with are responses: The delayed and not outraged enough condemnation of the photo of Melania on the eve of Utah's primary. The lack of an immediate and unequivocal denial of marital infidelity. Instead Cruz blamed Trump for the story. Putting Neil Bush on his campaign staff.

Why doesn't Cruz just come out and say he was NEVER unfaithful to Heidi?

52 posted on 03/26/2016 10:16:03 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: unlearner
It is not so simple. Whenever a candidate answers allegations, more questions get asked. It gets a candidate on the defense and off message. Lawsuits are useless. Freedom of press is a basic right. They have real people, making real claims. They also can legally choose to NOT disclose who the sources are. And going after the sources will be perceived as persecution and oppression regardless of whether there is any substance to the claims. If these people retract their statements, a dozen more will step forward to make similar claims. It’s like saying a candidate must apologize for something. Whenever they apologize, the complaint never goes away. It just makes it worse. Next they call for the candidate to drop out.

And how the fake church ladies ignored the bait question to Trump about asking God for forgiveness... Cruz and his supporters have been outed as hypocrites. They wear 'Jesus' like costume jewelry.

53 posted on 03/26/2016 10:23:01 AM PDT by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Yes, that ‘porn’ star... any right minded Jesus following critter would not deny a sinner a ‘godly’ income...


54 posted on 03/26/2016 10:25:21 AM PDT by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: kingu

It’s not as if Hillary has major problems of her own.


55 posted on 03/26/2016 10:25:40 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it." --Samuel Clemens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

The sound track for this is Candy Shop, by 50 Cent.


56 posted on 03/26/2016 10:27:39 AM PDT by jimbo807
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GLDNGUN
As I have already pointed out, no Cruz defenders are stepping forward to say that Cruz would not be doing these things. No, there’s no solid proof, yet, but why aren’t Cruz supporters willing to go out on a limb and vouch for their guy? Is it because you are afraid these stories are true?

Because there is no need to. There has not been one person or piece of evidence to come out that needs to be refuted. Jane Doe anonymous fiction is BS and you know it.

There are powerful people in this country who want Ted Cruz out of the way. Just like with Clarence Thomas, they know there are plenty of people like you who don't need facts, just accusations and tabloid trash. Cruz, like Thomas, is too smart to play that game.

The objective of these people is to get rid of both Cruz and Trump. Don't be so quick to get rid of Cruz because they are coming for your guy as well.

57 posted on 03/26/2016 10:29:28 AM PDT by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

Interesting tweet, given what we now know about The Thing.

Amy Lindsay
@amylindsayLA Amy Lindsay Retweeted FarmBoy

Funny! Maybe @marcorubio recognized me! Hmmm? Amy Lindsay added,

FarmBoy @farmboylogic
@amylindsayLA exactly what I was thinking. @tedcruz helped U or maybe it was @marcorubio since he recognized you. Pulling the ad was a boon

7:56 AM - 16 Feb 2016


58 posted on 03/26/2016 10:37:44 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Eh, people drink a whole lot more kool-aid when you’re talking about Monica’s ex-boyfriend’s wife who’s facing a stiff fight from a socialist senator who won’t even list himself as being a Democrat.


59 posted on 03/26/2016 10:39:24 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: grania
Why doesn't Cruz just come out and say he was NEVER unfaithful to Heidi?

Cruz can't and won't say that. He'll just keep denying. Slimy.

60 posted on 03/26/2016 10:42:10 AM PDT by Mr Apple ( AS OF MARCH 25, 2016.....IT'S PRESIDENT TRUMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson