Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Bill Clinton nominated a lot of judges too. Let's make sure that Hillary won't continue that.

The only one who has a chance of beating Hillary, is Trump.

1 posted on 03/18/2016 4:48:24 PM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Innovative

2 posted on 03/18/2016 4:49:04 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

If only it could be Ryan/Kasich... appointing them. (Ala Washington Bob)

Gosh, I hope so! /s


3 posted on 03/18/2016 4:49:55 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

I have long felt that we’re way past the tipping point. But, if there IS hope to restore our Republic, Ted Cruz is the only path.


5 posted on 03/18/2016 4:53:38 PM PDT by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Word.
This is the election where they grab the guns, folks.


7 posted on 03/18/2016 4:55:28 PM PDT by mabelkitty (Trump 2016 !!!!! Member of the Trumpist Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

8 posted on 03/18/2016 4:55:29 PM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie (Michelle Obama, The Early Years: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBYGxBlFOSU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative; All

Lots of judges need to be impeached and removed from the bench for promoting PC civil rights and unconstitutional federal actions. So if patriots elect as much of a new state sovereignty-respecting Congress as they can, then more than dozens of judicial vacancies will need to be filled.


10 posted on 03/18/2016 4:56:34 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

The Supreme Court doesn’t have to be 9 people. If we get the right guy in the White House, I’d like to see 9 very Conservative judges placed on the Supreme Court right at the start. Then we can start re-visiting some of the bad cases and Sotomayor and her friends won’t have much of a say at all.

1934 NFA?
Roe v Wade?
Obamacare?
etc
etc


11 posted on 03/18/2016 4:58:12 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (I don't know what Claire Wolfe is thinking, but I know what I'm thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

The backlog alone could be a full time job. God help the person that does this and God help us if it’s a socialist.


18 posted on 03/18/2016 5:04:43 PM PDT by jessduntno ("Where the Hell do you put the bayonet?" - Gen. "Chesty" Puller, at a flamethrower demonstration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Well, isn’t it nice that Harry Reid took the filibuster off the table for lower court judges? If we can keep the Senate and get the Presidency, maybe we can make up for the YUGE number of lower court judges Obama has appointed


19 posted on 03/18/2016 5:06:32 PM PDT by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
Bill Clinton nominated a lot of judges too.

He dismissed ALL 93 US ATTORNEYS and replaced them with his minions.

This is what the 'establishment' is afraid TRUMP will do. Get rid of the attorneys who are keeping the crimes of our politicians under wraps and put in people who will prosecute these criminals.

21 posted on 03/18/2016 5:08:43 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Good Trump can pack it with conservatives.


22 posted on 03/18/2016 5:10:02 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

When Clinton was inaugurated the first thing he did was fire all the federal judges Bush senior appointed. The MSM said it was Clinton’s prerogative. When Bush Jr. was inaugurated he fired just seven (out of I think 115 total) and the MSM went ballistic.


23 posted on 03/18/2016 5:11:51 PM PDT by SkyDancer ("Nobody Said I Was Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

If the GOP still holds the Senate after this election, It should look to split the 9th Circuit. Then appoint a mess of conservative justices.


25 posted on 03/18/2016 5:17:05 PM PDT by taxcontrol ( The GOPe treats the conservative base like slaves by taking their votes and refuses to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
Upon taking office next January, President Trump will likely face dozens of judicial vacancies to fill immediately...

There, that's fixed.

26 posted on 03/18/2016 5:27:08 PM PDT by Mr Apple ( COULTER on Hillary defending child rapist Thomas Taylor http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdkTqkLbL_4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
The only one who has a chance of beating Hillary, is Trump.

Yep - many here are hoping Cruz is successful at playing "spoiler" but that would get him even less votes and end up being a sure win for Hillary if Cruz were to end up with the nomination after a contested/brokered convention.

The choice now is, would one rather trump or Hillary be at the helm - I vote Trump.

28 posted on 03/19/2016 2:56:34 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson