Poll: Should GOP senators oppose Merrick Garland's nomination? Duh?

Washington Times ^ | 03/16/16

[AngelesCrestHighway]

http://www.washingtontimes.com/polls/2016/mar/16/should-gop-senators-oppose-merrick-garlands-nomina/

[BitWielder1]

Oppose, oppose, oppose, or what's the use of having Republicans senators at all.

[mindburglar]

Moron.

[NTHockey]

Of course, he’s going to cave along with all the other “mouths with no backbone”. There is existing legislation to prevent the nomination from even happening. But, as always, the same old pattern holds:
1. Story unfolds;
2. Republicans say they will oppose;
3. Half breed disregards law;
4. Republicans cave;
5. Half breed gets his way; we get BOHICA.
6. Everybody goes to the Friday night cocktail party and laughs at us.

[Carl Vehse]

Totally ignore Garland’s nomination, but you can tell the House to go ahead and impeach Traitorobama ASAP.

[Let's Roll]

“Wait for hearings” ?

Not even hearings under current regime.

I’m afraid that the left will riot, distract us with all the primary drama and sneak in an LGBTQWERTY loving, anti 2nd Amendment, PRO baby parts, open borders, more bennies for illegals loving candidate.

[Let's Roll]

Nope, not even a hearing. You can’t trust this senate.

[Awgie]

Yep yer the smart one. Still beating off reading yer Wonder Woman comics? Oh sorry, it doesn’t work any more does it.

Bring it on punk...

[mindburglar]

Pistols at dawn, dipshit.

[Iron Munro]

I'm sure to be pilloried, but I'm a stickler for usage. He won't be a lame duck until his successor is chosen in November.

Okay.

So as to not offend Pickers-Of-Nits in this Un-Safe Space we can just say Obama is a Lame Dork.

[King of Florida]

Sold!

[Iron Munro]

Sold!