Posted on 03/13/2016 10:13:20 PM PDT by Right-wing Librarian
What you are about to read is very important. It is the most detailed exposition of our national security clearance structure I have ever read, and, as far as I know, this is exactly how the system works and everyone in this nation needs to know what is about to happen as a result. Because once the FBI uncorks its probable referral for the indictment of Hillary Clinton, the American public will be subjected to a stream of lying and confusion that even lyin’ Ted Cruz cannot match. So, without further adieu, this is a letter sent by Major Ed Coet. It’s about 1,000 words long. I will simply read it in its entirety. It is entitled: What all Americans need to know about Hillary Clinton’s alleged SAP Compromise.” “My name is Ed Coet. I am a retired US Army Intelligence Officer. In my last job in the army I was the Chief of the Human Intelligence Branch for the US European Command in Stuttgart , Germany.”
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Lawlessness is the climate of the nation.
Must listen for all Freepers.
Thank you. How in God’s name did this woman with her long tainted background get confirmation for that position?
I really hope many Freepers will take the time to hear this. I think it will help prepare us for what the media will do with it, their spin, etc., when we reach that point. Although, perhaps I should have waited until morning to post the thread, so that more readers would see it.
I suspect the corruption is deeper and broader than any one human mind can absorb.
bump
RWL, many thanks!
The whole transcript needs to be posted, it is that important.
Have you another link that points to shrillary possibly compromising SAP info?
Something that Ben Still may have been going on?
Opps, Ben s/b Bill
(Transcript is also a godsend for deaf/very hearing impaired folks.. )
1K word paper said you have to take a lie detector test to access SAP. Some sociopaths can pass lie detector tests effortlessly. We don’t know if she was required to take one because she didn’t receive or send any information marked classified.
I have no other link, I’m sorry.
Bill Still really tells it like it is, he pulls no punches. He’s a true, patriotic American.
When I saw this one, I viewed it and thought other Freepers might be interested.
Cheers ; )
BTTT
I should know this, but, what does BTTT stand for?
I found the transcript here
https://westernrifleshooters.wordpress.com/2016/02/13/a-sap-synopsis/
Comments are —very— interesting....
WHAT ALL AMERICANS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON’S ALLEGED SAP COMPROMISE–MAJ ED COET, USA (RET)
[COURTESY: CAPT Les Horn, USN (Ret)]
My name is Ed Coet. I am a retired US Army Intelligence Officer. In my last job in the army I was the Chief of the Human Intelligence Branch for the US European Command in Stuttgart, Germany. In that capacity I was also the Designated Program Manager for a Special Access Program (SAP) like the SAP that Hillary Clinton is alleged to have compromised in the most recent State Department Inspector General report to congress and which has been widely reported in the news.
Here is what I personally know about SAP’s and what I can attest to in an unclassified forum:
1. The names of each SAP are themselves classified Top Secret because the information within the SAP are far and above Top Secret.
2. SAP’s are so sensitive that even people who have security clearances giving them access to Top Secret Sensitive Compartment Information (TS SCI), an enormously high security clearance level, cannot have accesses to a SAP’s unless they receive a special indoctrination into the SAP based on an operational “must know” that exceeds all other “need to know” standards.
3. Being “read on” for a SAP is far more then acknowledging in writing that you have been briefed on the SAP. It is an in-depth “indoctrination” into the given SAP, and each SAP is itself compartmented separately from other SAPS. Having access to one SAP does not give you access to another SAP, and in fact rarely does. Only a tiny handful of people have knowledge of all SAP’s. SAP’s are the most stringently compartmented and protected information in the entire US government.
4. Unlike Top Secret SCI which is maintained in highly secure Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilitates (SCIF’s) managed by specially trained Special Security Officers (SSO’s) at various levels of command, every single SAP is managed by an individually designated Program Manager for each individual SAP covering an entire theater of operations. In other words, SAP Program Managers are far fewer in number than there is SSO’s. SSO’s are not cleared to even know about SAP’s or to maintain information about them in their already enormously secure SCIF’s. How SAP’s are secured cannot be discussed because of the sensitive beyond Top Secret nature in which it is done.
5. Unlike individuals with the highest Top Secret SCI access security clearances, who must undergo a special background information with periodic “bring-up” background investigation, those tiny few who have access to SAP’s must also endure periodic polygraph tests in addition to the most comprehensive of special background investigations. I used to have to schedule four-star generals and admirals to be polygraphed in order for them to maintain their access to my SAP. Many generals and admirals who obviously have the highest security clearances still did not rate being indoctrinated into my SAP. In fact, they didn’t even know the SAP existed.
6. Compromise of a SAP is the single most dangerous security violation that can ever happen to the USA. Even the enormously damaging revelations of the Edward Snowden’s TOP Secret SCI security compromise does not reach the level of a SAP compromise.
7. To put SAP information in to an unsecure sever like Hillary Clinton’s unsecure server is a class one felony that could, in some cases, result in life in prison. That is because such a compromise is so dangerous that it could and likely will result in the death of people protected by and within the scope of the SAP.
As a former SAP Program Manager I believe it is inconceivable that if it is verified that Hillary Clinton’s server actually had SAP information on it that she could possibly escape indictment and criminal prosecution. As hard as it is to imagine, that would even be worse then electing to not prosecute a mass murdering serial killer because even they could not inflict as much damage on our country as the compromise of a SAP. Compromise of a SAP not only could — but without doubt would — cause serious damage to our national security.
If it is true that Hillary Clinton had SAP information on her unsecure server, whether it was marked or not, you can be sure that the FBI will strongly recommend that charges be brought against Hillary Clinton and continue in an exhaustive investigation to trace back to every single person that had even the tiniest role in this unbelievable security compromise.
If the Attorney General, through “prosecutorial discretion,” elected not to prosecute this crime, I believe congress would have no alternative but to impeach her, and the FBI would then have no choice but to conduct a criminal investigation of her for a deliberate cover up –- so grave is this security violation.
If President Obama were to pardon Hillary Clinton for a compromise of this magnitude he would render himself in the historical record as an “enemy of the state,” and could himself face criminal prosecution –- so grave is such a security compromise. Nobody, not even the POTUS could gets away with something like this in our system of government.
If anyone could escape persecution for compromising a SAP, we are deep trouble as a nation. No president who loves this country and is ttrue to his oath would ever allow anyone, not even his or her closest and most loved relative, to get away with a SAP compromise. It is simply unimaginable that this could ever happen.
If the ongoing investigation finds that Hillary Clinton compromised a SAP, then we all should know with certainty, regardless of political persuasion, that she is entirely unfit to hold public office of any kind let alone President of the USA — and ALL Americans should never tolerate it. Compromising a SAP is an absolute “disqualifier” for public office and access to our nations most sensitive information – period.
ED COET
Major, US Army (Retired)
http://www.bewilderingstories.com/bios/coet_bio.html
P.S. It is my sincere hope that each of you will share this article, to help other Americans understand how grave Hillary Clinton’s alleged SAP compromise is. We can’t allow anyone so careless with this level of information to have access to any classified information ever again for as long as she lives. This would surely render her unqualified and unfit to hold any public office let alone POTUS if this allegation proves to be true.
“Back To The Top.”
For those who view the comments as they hit rather than the articles as they hit. (Choice is at top of page).
I like this guy, but am I the only one who thinks he sounds like he has a computer generated voice?
thanks for the link.
I especially liked the part where the letters author claims Obama could be prosecuted if he pardons Hillary if it is determined she and he compromised the highest level of national security.
The 100 word quote from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCEL1Bxp6NA
“My name is Ed Coet. I am a retired US Army Intelligence Officer. In my last job in the army I was the Chief of the Human Intelligence Branch for the US European Command in Stuttgart , Germany.”
“In that capacity I was also the Designated Program Manager for a Special Access Program (SAP) like the SAP that Hillary Clinton is alleged to have compromised in the most recent State Department Inspector General report to congress and which has been widely reported in the news.”
“Here is what I personally know about SAP’s and what I can attest to in an unclassified forum:”
“1. The names of each SAP are themselves classified Top Secret because the information within the SAP are far and above Top Secret.”
“2. SAP’s are so sensitive that even people who have security clearances giving them access to Top Secret Sensitive Compartmented Information (TS/SCI), an enormously high security clearance level, cannot have accesses to a SAP’s unless they receive a special indoctrination into the SAP based on an operational “must know” that exceeds all other “need to know” standards.”
“3. Being “read in” to an SAP is far more then acknowledging in writing that you have been briefed on the SAP. It is an in-depth “indoctrination” into the given SAP, and each SAP is itself compartmented separately from other SAPS.”
“Having access to one SAP does not give you access to another SAP. Only a tiny handful of people have knowledge of all SAP’s. SAP’s are the most stringently compartmented and protected information in the entire US government.”
“4. Unlike Top Secret/SCI which is maintained in highly secure Sensitive Compartmented Information Facilitates (SCIF’s) managed by specially trained Special Security Officers (SSO’s) at various levels of command, every single SAP is managed by an individually designated Program Manager for each individual SAP covering an entire theater of operations.”
“SSO’s are not cleared to even know about SAP’s or to maintain information about them in their already enormously secure SCIF’s. How SAP’s are secured cannot be discussed because of the sensitive, beyond-Top-Secret nature in which it is done.”
“5. Unlike individuals with the highest Top Secret/SCI access security clearances, who must undergo a special background investigation, those tiny few who have access to SAP’s must also endure periodic polygraph tests in addition to the most comprehensive of special background investigations.
“I used to have to schedule four-star generals and admirals to be polygraphed in order for them to maintain their access to my SAP.
“Many generals and admirals who obviously have the highest security clearances still did not rate being indoctrinated into my SAP. In fact, they didn’t even know the SAP existed.”
“6. Compromise of a SAP is the single most dangerous security violation that can ever happen to the USA .
“Even the enormously damaging revelations of the Edward Snowden’s Top Secret/ SCI security compromise does not reach the level of a SAP compromise.”
“7. To put SAP information in to an unsecured sever, like Hillary Clinton’s unsecured server, is a class one felony that could, in some cases, result in life in prison.
“That is because such a compromise is so dangerous that it could and likely will result in the death of people protected by and within the scope of the SAP.”
“As a former SAP Program Manager I believe it is inconceivable that if it is verified that Hillary Clinton’s server actually had SAP information on it, that she could possibly escape indictment and criminal prosecution.
“As hard as it is to imagine, that would even be worse than electing to not prosecute a mass murdering serial killer because even they could not inflict as much damage to our country as the compromise of a SAP.
It is some old school stuff.
Back in the day, when “articles” and “comments” were displayed in the order in which they were posted,
any comment would send the article back to the top of the list.
BTTT = bump to the top
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.