Posted on 03/06/2016 9:14:56 PM PST by mbrfl
For the past 4 years, we've heard Mark Levin tell his radio audience that this time around, conservatives need to rally behind one conservative who can actually beat the establishment. As near as I can tell, Levin seems to have gone silent on that point in recent months.
As we watch the GOPe ramp up their attacks on Trump, borrowing from the Mississippi playbook of dirty tricks, wouldn't now be the time to rally around the only candidate who can take out the GOPe - Trump? Any thoughts?
Michael Savage now devotes virtually every program of his to pushing Trump. He has Trump on for interviews at least twice a week, too. He was recently heard asking the Donald for an invitation to Mar-e-lago for some upcoming event. To me, that sounded like a lower middle class person from Queens.
Savage is completely upfront in his support of Trump. Levin, OTOH, hypocritically plays the neutral while running months of Cruz campaign infomercials.
Which state will Cruz win that Romney did not win in 2012. State by State voting.
Obama won Florida by 80,000 votes. The idea that Cruz will take it over a Dem is a Cruzer fairy tale.
>>Will you explain to me the difference between Schumer, Clinton, Reid and the garden variety Republican?
The first group voted for Obamacare. The latter didnt.
Both groups fully funded Obamacare and both groups desperately want socialized medicine. In the case of the GOP because their big donors want health care off their books.
Supporting PP supports abortion, Trump talks like the liberals on this. Hes echoing Hillary.
Ted Cruz is a sitting U. S. Senator that belongs to a political party that fully funds PP abortions. He’s far more personally responsible for those dead babies than private citizen Donald Trump is.
Cruz has pulled one of the greatest cons I have ever seen. This resume is exactly the same as Zero. Ivy league education, check. Harvard law school, check. Editor of Harvard law review, check. Married to an establishment insider, check. No meaningful private sector work experience, check. First term junior senator, check. Not a natural born citizen, check. Foreign born father, American mother check. Raised mostly by mom. check.
Great post. Solid gold and spot on on every point. Unfortunately, it seems that loving eyes can never see.
Cruz is a globalist. He started pretending to be a constitutional conservative several years ago, planning a run for the WH.
It’s no coincidence that career politician Ted Cruz’z battlefield conversion to anti-establishmentism happened exactly around the TEA revolution. Like a lot of career pols he jumped on the TEA train to advance his career goals and he’ll dump us when it suits them.
Im gonna out on the limb and take the minority. Position and say, Ted Cruz will get the nomination. The GopE will get him to play ball and that will be that.
Not going to happen. The GOPe will run Rubio or another zombie candidate to keep Cruz under 1237 delegates and then broker a convention.
>>>Ted Cruz is a sitting U. S. Senator that belongs to a political party
Some of whose members he fought against to defund PP - in toto. Trump does not want to defund them and thinks they do wonderful work.
>>>Hes far more personally responsible for those dead babies than private citizen Donald Trump is.
Your argument here strains the boundaries of speciousness.
Without Schumer, Clinton, Reid there would be no Obamacare. Absent any one of them.
My suspicion is that he fine with this because he’s in tank for Cruz and these tricks benefit Cruz. As soon as GOPe and Romney deny Cruz the nomination (they don’t like him either), Levin will squeal like a stuck pig.
As a Trumper I am now following the Romney Rule: Write in the candidate of your choice should your candidate not be on the ballot.
Upstate NY is conservative. Trump will win upstate going away, win Long Island and carry millions of votes in NYC. It’s all about jobs.
The day when Mark Levin is considered GOP-E, that’s the day we can safely say that there is a part of what call themselves the “conservative movement” that are actually insane.
Trump would be a much better democrat president than Hillary.
Trump supporters love to tout polls showing The Don way ahead somewhere.
Yet, they stubbornly refuse to look at all the polls showing Hillary beating Donald Trump and Ted Cruz beating Hillary.
For all the love (undeserved) he has here, Trump is very unpopular nationally.
Not worthy of you, onyx.
I thought of a great metaphor yesterday,if I say so.
It was on a thread about Trump’s pitiful attempt to claim that Trump University had a good rating.
He was so desperate to do so that he violated the Fox debate rules. Of course, rules don’t apply to The Don - that’s what you love about him, isn’t it?
Anyway, I remarked how strange and unbecoming it was for a multi-millionaire to be so greedy that he would engage in a petty scheme to defraud gullible but innocent people out of their savings.
Gullible because they believed Donald Trump.
I said it is a metaphor for all the nice people here who are putting their faith in an unworthy savior.
That means he has a lot of money to pay for the class action law suit, plus all the lawsuits the individual states have filed against him.
Do you remember Trump warning the people about all the lawsuits Ted would have to face over the birther thing?
And yet it is The Donald who is inundated with pervasive legal wranglings.
Are you so out of touch that you don't know Pat Caddell is a Democrat? No wonder you were suckered into supporting Cruz.
Caddell was born in Rock Hill, South Carolina. He has worked for Democratic presidential candidates George McGovern in 1972, Jimmy Carter in 1976 and 1980, Gary Hart in 1984, Joe Biden in 1988, and Jerry Brown in 1992. He also worked for Colorado Senate candidate Andrew Romanoff in 2010.[1]
Do you think enough people have figured this out to affect the vote (much)?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.