Posted on 02/24/2016 6:00:51 PM PST by jazusamo
Republicans in Washington are coming to grips with the increasing likelihood that Donald Trumpwill be their presidential nominee.
It's a scenario few would have taken seriously last summer, when Trump jumped into the race against what Republicans believed was their strongest presidential field in decades.
But the real estate mogul has nearly vanquished them all, winning three out of the first four contests by double-digit margins while leaving his closest remaining rivals -- Sens. Marco Rubio
(Fla.) and Ted Cruz
(Texas) -- in the dust.
With surveys putting him ahead in most of the states set to vote in next week's Super Tuesday contests, Trump is on the verge of acquiring a delegate lead that could prove insurmountable.
Following his resounding victory in the Nevada caucuses Tuesday, at least two Republican lawmakers said it's time for their party to stop fighting the Trump phenomenon.
Reps. Chris Collins (N.Y.) and Duncan Hunter (Calif.) on Wednesday became the first members of Congress to endorse Trump. Collins, who hails from the billionaire's home state of New York and had previously endorsed Jeb Bush's White House bid, cited Trump's business background.
"If we want to get our nation's economy growing again and deal with the daunting fiscal issues threatening America's future, it's time to say no to professional politicians and yes to someone who has created jobs and grown a business," Collins said in the statement.
"We're electing a chief executive, not a chief politician," Collins told The Buffalo News.
Hunter, who first endorsed Mike Huckabee, praised Trump's "guts" and "fortitude" and predicted to Politico that other lawmakers might soon start to "come out of the closet" in support of him.
While Trump hasn't received a single endorsement from Senate Republicans, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) -- who has been supportive of Trump and Cruz-- expressed confidence that his colleagues would come around if Trump triumphs in the end.
"I think he's going to need to show discipline and more specificity ... and I'll think he'll do fine. He certainly has brain power," Sessions told The Hill.
"I'll tell you what I tell my colleagues: I don't know what side you're on, but I'm on the people's side. I don't think Washington is doing very well, either."
While many Republican lawmakers have been critical of Trump, particularly for his call to temporarily ban most Muslims from entering the United States, there appears to be a growing realization that his march to the nomination might be unstoppable.
"I think there's increasing fear from some of them that he'll be the nominee. And there's going to be less resistance to him as a result," said Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.), who has endorsed Cruz.
Senate Republicans, wary of alienating Trump's conservative supporters, are increasingly falling in line behind the strategy of offering support for whoever wins the nomination.
But not everyone is ready to give Trump a full embrace.
Congressional endorsements are still flowing to Rubio despite his failure to win a single caucus or primary.
Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), who endorsed Rubio this week, suggested that while some Republicans were "surprised" and "very concerned" about Trump's win in Nevada, he believes it's more likely that Trump won't be the party's nominee.
"It's more difficult after last night; let's face it, that was a bigger win than we thought," he said. "But I don't think it's too late, people get more serious, very few delegates have been awarded yet."
Meanwhile, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), one of Trump's most vocal critics, warned Wednesday that the GOP will be "slaughtered" if the businessman is the nominee. He refused to say whether he would vote for him, despite having signed a "loyalty pledge" to back the nominee during his own failed White House run.
"Well, I'll cross that bridge when I get there," Graham told reporters, adding that Republicans have less than a week to stop Trump's momentum.
If Trump wins two-thirds of the delegates in the
March 1 Super Tuesday contests, as polls suggest he might, Graham said the GOP race would effectively be over.
"You're not really going to be able to take it away from him at the convention," Graham said.
After Nevada's caucuses, Trump has 81 delegates, compared to 17 for Cruz, 17 for Rubio, six for John Kasich and four for Ben Carson. Eleven states and American Samoa will award delegates on Super Tuesday, amounting to about a quarter of all the outstanding delegates.
A handful of Republicans maintain that they will refuse to vote for Trump no matter what.
Rep. Carlos Curbelo (R-Fla.), a freshman who faces a tough reelection race this year, said Trump is a "fraud" and "offensive."
"I could never look my children in the eye and tell them that I supported someone like that to be president of the most important and the greatest nation in the world," Curbelo told The Hill.
The Cuban-American lawmaker, who had endorsed Bush but switched his allegiance to Rubio this week, suggested alternatives to Trump could still emerge.
"Maybe we'll get some new candidates after the conventions," Curbelo said. "A lot can happen from here to the end of summer."
Amash, a libertarian and member of the House Freedom Caucus, also said he would not support Trump if he's the nominee.
"I'm really concerned that the reaction from a large segment of our party has been to support someone who doesn't really care much about our Constitution, who seems to believe the ends justify the means. In many respects, it's similar to the thinking of the establishment. It's just a different kind of establishment," Amash said.
GOP leaders have largely avoided making public judgments about Trump while tacitly acknowledging that he has a good chance of being atop the ticket.
Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), who is staying neutral in the GOP primaries, dodged a question about Trump at a Wednesday press conference and has sidestepped queries about the race for weeks. But he has weighed in on occasion: Ryan condemned Trump's proposal to ban Muslims from the U.S. late last year.
And Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.), who runs House Republicans' campaign arm, tried to downplay a potential Trump effect down the ballot. "Both parties are going to have issues with their nominee, whoever the nominee is," he said.
Still, House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) said earlier this week that there's a greater than 50 percent chance that Trump becomes the GOP nominee, adding that he could work with him.
Despite GOP lawmakers' reservations about Trump, Amash suggested Republicans have no one to blame but themselves for his rise.
"It's the fault of Republicans in Congress. It's the fault of the GOP leadership. They don't seem to recognize the anger and distrust that people feel toward Congress," Amash said.
Graham, however, offered up another culprit: The tactics of Cruz, who is competing with Trump for the nomination.
"Ted Cruz and others have made people believe we could repeal ObamaCare if we wanted to and we just didn't want to, which is a complete lie," Graham said. "There's been an effort to create a dynamic where we're the problem."
Jonathan Easley contributed.
No thanks.
About flippin time
Yeah. Be sure to show everybody a lesson and stay home.
All Trump has to do is stand firm against the frenzied attacks for a few more weeks, and he can watch the inevitable GOP circular firing squad form, as it always does in the face of opposition...
it’s not surprising that Rubio and Cruz would get many more Congressional endorsements than Trump, since A) they work there and B) only 14% of Americans think they’re doing a good job.
Amazing how far we have come. The last time it took a civil war. Perhaps sanity can prevail this time and the trash get left at the curb.
It’s fun to listen to these cries of “We must stop Donald Trump!”. It’s like half the people here, NRO, TedHall, TedState, basically everywhere, are totally indistinguishable from comment threads on MSNBC, KOS, et al.
It’s an amazing thing to behold.
>No thanks.
You’re not welcome.
I have never (since 1970, when I was first eligible) missed a vote, my good FRiend; and, that will not change.
I have always voted for the GOP presidential nom; and, that will not change.
I hope that it is not Mister (lifelong DEM, Planned Parenthood supporting, socialized medicine supporting, 9/11 truther and for some huge reason, tax statement release refusing trump.
Trump is Perot.
.
The liberals win either way
A no vote is a vote for Clinton. Enjoy what you get.
Linda and his colleagues didn’t want to confront and stop Obama.
Trump is where he is today because of them.
Stop blaming the messenger.
Election results so far?
Waiting for Perot
“Trump is Perot.”
Ross Perot ran as an Independent, while George H W Bush was the GOP nominee. It’s looking like Trump could be the GOP nominee.
So how does that make him Perot? (Why is this not `apples and oranges’?)
It makes him Perot if you believe him to be independent, and not your generic GOP-e candidate like all the party stiffs since George `Read my lips!’ Bush
Most of us want someone independent of `Uniparty’ who can win, while some of us want to maintain the GOP status quo ante and lose.
OK, great! Thanks for clearing that up.
Reality check for the GOPe. Trump isn’t your problem. He’s a symptom.
We The People, are your problem!
YOURE FIRED!
Being unable to defeat him, they will try to turn him to the Dark Side.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.