Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton insists she is 'not worried at all' about her email scandal as she faces being subpoenaed
Daily Mail ^ | 2/24/16 | Francesca Chambers, Nikki Schwab

Posted on 02/24/2016 2:27:48 AM PST by Libloather

Clinton insists she is 'not worried at all' about her email scandal as she faces being subpoenaed for her entire secret email account

Hillary Clinton still isn't sweating over her email scandal, even after a federal judge warned today that the Democratic hopeful's entire email server could be subpoenaed.

'I know there are are challengers about what the State Department did or did not do - that will all be worked out,' she said tonight at a CNN town hall. 'It's just not something that is going to have a lasting effect. And I am not at all worried about it.'

Earlier today, U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan ruled that U.S. State Department officials and aides to Clinton should be questioned under oath about whether the former secretary of state's use of a private email system was an effort to skirt open records laws.

'How on earth can the court conclude there is not at minimum a reasonable suspicion of bad faith,' Sullivan said.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arkansas; US: Nevada; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; clinton; election2016; email; hillaryclinton; hitlery; nevada; newyork; scandal; subpoena; trump; wipewater
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: Buck-I-Guy
Not going to happen.

She won't even the Democrat nominee!

21 posted on 02/24/2016 3:22:05 AM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

When the details of Hillary’s criminality are leaked to the public, the Rinos might as well take a hike. Trump will eviscerate her. The media might as well be locked in a cage match along with Hillary and Trump. Even the Karadashians are going to be ignored when Hillary is lit up.


22 posted on 02/24/2016 3:25:15 AM PST by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

I hope so.


23 posted on 02/24/2016 3:27:15 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The fix has been in on this one from jump. The only quandary Hillary faces is deciding which low-level former subordinate to throw down as the sacrificial lamb.

Get used to it, folks. Hillary is in the clear. Nothing will befall her.


24 posted on 02/24/2016 3:36:36 AM PST by ScottinVA (If you're not enraged...why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
She knows EVERYTHING about Obama.....he will NOT indict her.

I bet she does, and she knows that he won't even make the mistake of calling her bluff.

25 posted on 02/24/2016 3:38:02 AM PST by Cyclone59 (Where are we going, and what's with the handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Of course she is not worried! She figures she can lie her way through anything after lying her way through her entire marriage and life. I actually will be shocked if the law ever catches up to her; she has gotten away with everything so far!


26 posted on 02/24/2016 3:38:35 AM PST by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf
Of course she won’t. It doesn’t matter. The scandal is going to blow up in Obama’s face. The FBI via leaks is already trying Clinton in the court of public opinion.

I agree, which is why I say Loretta Lynch will indict. It is the only way to control the inevitable prosecution, and plea-bargain for Hillary's silence on Obama's role.

Obama can "no comment, because this is an ongoing case", until Hillary gets pretty much the Petraeus penalty in exchange for not implicating Obama. The only way for Obama to control this is to indict, IMO.

27 posted on 02/24/2016 3:39:57 AM PST by wayoverontheright (A falling camel attracts many knives.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

“They’ll squeal like Ned Beaty in Deliverance.”

Like Susan McDougal?


28 posted on 02/24/2016 3:40:01 AM PST by ScottinVA (If you're not enraged...why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
Sorry, but I must correct your post...

Of course she’s not worried. She has a DEMOCRAT-run Justice Department that will never press charges, and if by chance they do, she has Obummer to give her a Presidential Pardon.

29 posted on 02/24/2016 3:40:21 AM PST by Cyclone59 (Where are we going, and what's with the handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: browniexyz
O J Simpson thought so too! Look at him now............
30 posted on 02/24/2016 3:47:14 AM PST by Forty-Niner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher

Yep. No. 1 rule from law school ...never ask a question you don’t know the answer to.


31 posted on 02/24/2016 3:53:46 AM PST by bjorn14 (Woe to those who call good evil and evil good. Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

With her being a habitual liar, one might assume that she is worried. Not about going to prison, because that will never happen. But worried about losing her precious Queendom.


32 posted on 02/24/2016 4:11:52 AM PST by Old Yeller (Calling Obama a POS is a major insult to S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

“’I know there are are challengers about what the State Department did or did not do - that will all be worked out,’ she said tonight at a CNN town hall. ‘It’s just not something that is going to have a lasting effect. And I am not at all worried about it.’”

The main thing that is never commented on by the alphabet networks is that Hillary will be repeating this same phrase right up until she gets hauled away, or they throw dirt on her. Whether or not she actually faces legal repercussions these accusations are going to stick with her throughout her hoped-for presidency and into her retirement years.

So the bottom line is that Hillary’s stock protestations are not ‘news’ and constant repetition of them in the median is an overt attempt to propagandize a segment of the American electorate.


33 posted on 02/24/2016 4:22:30 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

Hillary has varied her response with each revelation. It still goes to suitability for high office. It should be obvious that she’s severely lacking.


34 posted on 02/24/2016 4:28:20 AM PST by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

With the extent of what she has done, including exposing billions of dollars of intelligence ‘collection’ systems, exposing human intel sources, and causing damage that will take decades to repair if the true extent of the damage can ever be determined, how does the Intelligence community ‘allow’ her to become president? She obviously has absolutely NO regard for national security or the lives of anyone in the intelligence community (or anyone other than herself & her family for that matter) ..... she puts herself first, last & always. She is not dropping out of the race, even if indicted, which (IMO) makes it likely she will have another unfortunate fall or stroke, etc. that keeps her from continuing to run.


35 posted on 02/24/2016 4:32:32 AM PST by Qiviut (In Islam you have to die for Allah. The God I worship died for me. [Franklin Graham])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

“Clinton insists she is ‘not worried at all’. .”

Yeah why should she be worried, its not like her last name is Petraus or Snowden,


36 posted on 02/24/2016 5:06:34 AM PST by captmar-vell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: browniexyz

When a has a Clinton ever had to answer for any of their crimes, why should this time be different,


37 posted on 02/24/2016 5:07:59 AM PST by captmar-vell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: captmar-vell

“She is not dropping out of the race, even if indicted, which (IMO) makes it likely she will have another unfortunate fall or stroke, etc. that keeps her from continuing to run.”

I think ultimately she’ll be incapacitated. Six foot of dirt on top of her would make it difficult to run for president.


38 posted on 02/24/2016 5:21:25 AM PST by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Cyclone59

Thank you, my publik educasion is showing.


39 posted on 02/24/2016 5:31:05 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
They will squeal like Ned Beaty in Deliverance. Are you are talking about the love scene? lol

I would like to see Huma and Cheryl under oath.

40 posted on 02/24/2016 5:53:04 AM PST by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson