Posted on 02/14/2016 6:57:13 AM PST by MarvinStinson
It has long been known, though rarely spoken of publicly, that Valerie Jarrett, Senior White House adviser to Barack Obama and perhaps the single most influential figure in Washington D.C. deems the Supreme Court as the key to solidifying her version of America for generations to come.
Maybe that is why she has allegedly set her sights on damaging perhaps the most conservative member of that court, Justice Antonin Scalia.
Two days ago, Justice Scalia remarked during a case involving the University of Texas and race-based admission policies that favor minority students over white students. Scalia cited an amicus brief that indicated some minority students were not prepared for the rigors of some of the more rigorous academic programs the race based policies were forced to admit them into and were thus being harmed by those same policies.
Studies have indicated time and again Justice Scalia is correct.
Even the SAT has not been immune to this race-based policy. It was recently learned black students attempting access to elite universities receive 230 “bonus points†on the exam just for being black. White students are given no such bonus, while Asian students are actually penalized 50 points.
It is a policy quietly initiated during the Obama administration. It would appear the Obama White House does not think black students capable of performing without those bonus points, thus ensuring some black students end up attending universities they cannot perform at a waste of both time and resources.
Justice Scalia is now being vilified for pointing out the discriminatory nature that is race based university admission policies, policies that ultimately harm so many of the students it claims to be helping.
Now Jarrett pawns like Senator Harry Reid, the Congressional Black Caucus, Leticia James, and a cadre of far left media generated rebukes, are calling Scalias comments racist, insensitive, and out of touch.
It would appear truth has no place in this current political climate.
If you and I have to bang on the waterpipes in our FEMA Re-education Camp cells in order to communicate, we will do so.
we have been hanging on by our fingernails and it was actually Justice Scalias hand to whom those fingernails belonged.
Amen Brother. Let’s keep fighting.
One thing we must remember is that the Senate Judiciary Committee is chaired by Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa. This is someone who has the patience to stand fast and dig his heels in. Had Hatch, Cornyn, Graham or McCain been the chairman, we’d be screwed already. Watch Grassley, I feel comfortable in saying he will do well for us.
Be assured, this is a man who knows how to watch corn grow.
ditto
We’re going to need to channel our inner William Wallace.
John Roberts understands it would have been him had he voted against Obamacare. He let Scalia write the second half of the opinion.
You may recall that the Soviet Constitution was, if you look at the text, a perfectly democratic document. But all the judges were Communists hacks, and every decision purely political. This is what the Democrats want done to our constitution, that every decision be political.
I hope. But so far he has pretty much let Obama choose whom he will
Your statement assumes President Jarrett and her Obamas will move on in January of 2017. Maybe they will and maybe they won’t....
Perhaps it is in God’s Plan to punish this country for tossing Him out of our children’s education plus all the other evil acts we have allowed to happen in the last few years——God will not be mocked!
I wonder how long it will be until his death notice is posted?
For Scalia,
the law was a tablet whose meaning could be discerned by focusing on the meaning of the words it contained,
rather than by asking ourselves what we want it to mean.
The latter, he said, was the stuff of politics, not law,
and he drew a line in the sand between the two.
Oh, did the Muslim brotherhood traitor and Iranian spy get her pants in a twist over the Constitution?
Too bad, so sad.
Looking forward to her day in court, followed by her hanging.
the law was a tablet whose meaning could be discerned by focusing on the meaning of the words it contained
********************
To the strict constructionist, the word ‘apple’ means just what we all know and instantly recognize to be an edible food grown and produced from a particular type of deciduous tree.
The liberal is comfortable with reinterpreting the word to mean any kind of edible fruit. The word conveniently means whatever they want it to be.
Like Haman!
Thanks for reposting. I had seen it quite a while ago and wanted to keep it. It is in my collection.
Find the quote at a reliable source. Book mark it or save it with the reference and use it everywhere. As a matter of fact I have a word document for quotes I use for the truth and would like to add it.
For me, the death of Scalia is a test from God for those who believe in Scalia’s interpretation of the Constitution. It is now or never.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.