Payback.
Legislator vs executor
Well if it's just about who offers you the best deal I suppose you'd be better off negotiating with Cruz than Trump.
Cruz bases his election on facts not emotion. Trump knows how to work emotions and facts. Conservatives hasn't had a candidate that can work emotions since Reagen. Which means Trump could win with a land slide if he doesn't destroy his own candidacy.
Love Cruz, but he has not found a way to connect to voters. He is also not good at this time at dealing with the press or traps laid out by the press and opponents.
Trump is part populist but clings also to a lot of conservative views and has a eagle’s eye set on our financial issues.
Trump more than Cruz is a leader. He says all the things many have wished could be said for years.
I would only vote for Cruz or Trump though. No Rubio ever...
What is your religious affiliation and of what evil are you publicly accusing Sarah Palin ?
I think she’s saying we still need Cruz as Senator. Trump as POTUS would be an ADDITION of a fighter into the system, whereas Cruz as POTUS would be a shifting of one fighter into a different fighting position.
Your decision, I suppose, would be based on how you would arrange the chess pieces to best serve your country and/or your family.
Good luck. I’m still undecided. I like Cruz for governance but like Trump for exposing the coup of 2008 so the Republic can be restored.
I suspect, however, that Obama is going to get the Iranians to do an EMP attack on us in November or December when Obama is in the southern hemisphere yukking it up with his communist buddies (such as the communists in Venezuela who allowed Hamas and Hezbollah agents to be flown from Iran to Venezuela in unchecked flights - and who, IIRC, promised Ahmadinejad a base from which to launch missiles if he wanted to attack the US...). Such an attack may have been the plan way back in July of 2008 when Obama said he would be POTUS for “the next 8-10 years”. The aftermath of this kind of attack would be chaos, and the newly-elected POTUS would not be inaugurated.
If you have access to either or both Presidential hopefuls, you might want to suggest that they focus on North Korea and Iran having nukes and the ability to deliver them via the hole in our southern radar defense - because even if either of them wins they can never be inaugurated if Obama’s 7 years of arming, funding, training, defending, and giving complete access to our communist and Islamist enemies was all part of a successful plan to keep a patriot from ever taking office before the USA is dismantled and given to those enemies.
Money or blackmail? I’d bet on blackmail.
We are not to judge Sarah? Uh yeah we are. That is what we do in elections. Really losing respect for her.
And now you're pissed off because neither one has called.......So sad.......LOL!
So does that mean we should feel just as good electing an atheist or a Muslim and not "judge" a candidate on religion? This is a silly argument she's making. To the extent that one's religious and moral beliefs reflect public policy, it's extremely important to judge a candidate on this. If your religious is pacifist, that will affect how you act as commander-in-chief, for example.