Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

... best media mouthpiece since Geraldo Riveria!

1 posted on 02/01/2016 2:44:25 AM PST by Zakeet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Zakeet

An uninformed reporter who reads only handouts from the Hillary campaign.


2 posted on 02/01/2016 2:50:18 AM PST by plangent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

Cherry-picked obfuscational mumbo jumbo around why her server, her gross neglect and ordering subordinates to improperly and illegally remove classified marking headings and transmit unclassified is not ‘criminal’.

Any other citizen would already be serving out a sentence.


3 posted on 02/01/2016 2:55:06 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

150 FBI agents may think differently.


4 posted on 02/01/2016 2:56:53 AM PST by Hang'emAll (If guns kill people, do pencils misspell words?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

She’s committee high treason pure and simple. We’re not talking only criminal acts here, but some along the scale of the Rosenberg treason.


6 posted on 02/01/2016 3:00:01 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

For good old Dan and the “ends justifies the means” party foolish and shady behavior is just okie dokie for a President.


8 posted on 02/01/2016 3:03:30 AM PST by DAC21 (.z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

Dan Abrams! LOL! Media Doofus!


9 posted on 02/01/2016 3:03:43 AM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet
It is also indisputable that it was neither a crime nor even a violation of State Department procedure

It's indisputable, I tell ya. It's settled law and there's a consensus.

10 posted on 02/01/2016 3:04:10 AM PST by Colorado Doug (Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

This “is also indisputable” BS from Dan Abrams.


11 posted on 02/01/2016 3:04:58 AM PST by Balata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

What he says amounts to: She has not been convicted in a court of law, so she has not committed a crime, yet, that we know of.

He does not once mention that the leaks point toward numerous crimes, and his claim that we have not seen many prosecutions for this sort of behavior is whistling past the graveyard.

The main point that he seems to be making is that Hillary made a mistake because she got caught.


13 posted on 02/01/2016 3:08:47 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

ABC = Always Backing Clinton


14 posted on 02/01/2016 3:10:58 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Falcon 105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

So chugging all that vodka and running naked through Walmart was foolish and therefore not criminal? Really Dan? We can separate “Foolish” from “Criminal”? Now people can choose between “Guilty” “Not Guilty” and “Foolish” That should decrease the prison population.


17 posted on 02/01/2016 3:16:16 AM PST by EandH Dad (sleeping giants wake up REALLY grumpy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

She’s actually trying to say that, as Secretary of State, she never once received classified information on her unsecured, illegal server. Asking her questions about this position is somehow unserious and abusive.

I always thought she was a communist. Now I think another “C” word applies.


19 posted on 02/01/2016 3:21:00 AM PST by muir_redwoods (Freedom isn't free, liberty isn't liberal and you'll never find anything Right on the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet
ANALYSIS: No, Hillary Clinton Did Not Commit a Crime ... at Least Based on What We Know Today

Actually kneepad boy is correct. She did not commit a crime. He is 100% correct. What he failed to point out is she has committed over 1000 felonies as of last count. Each email that was classified is a separate crime.

20 posted on 02/01/2016 3:26:41 AM PST by cpdiii (DECKHAND, ROUGHNECK, GEOLOGIST, PILOT, PHARMACIST, LIBERTARIAN The Constitution is worth dying for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet
... at Least Based on What We Know Today

Obviously Abrams knows nothing.

21 posted on 02/01/2016 3:30:43 AM PST by Family Guy (A society's first line of defense is not the law but customs, traditions and moral values. -Williams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

New bumper sticker:
HRC - foolish and even potentially shady, but not criminal.


22 posted on 02/01/2016 3:36:30 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

Danny appears concerned that he may not have the opportunity to vote for “the world’s first U.S. president” and therefore not be able to make “history.” What a jerk. You need to stick with taking “selfies” Danny. Leave the grownup stuff to grownups.


24 posted on 02/01/2016 3:38:10 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Viruses and diseases must be DemocRATS. They love open borders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

Abrams is a longtime Dem apologist and Clinton rumpswab. I’d take anything he says with a grain of salt. He had become known during the OJ Simpson trial as a legal analyst and only went full moonbat aftet the trial was over.


31 posted on 02/01/2016 4:02:21 AM PST by CASchack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

“B_ased on what we know it’s indi_S_putable”

Which can be abbreviated as BS.

Based on what the rest of you know Scarlett Johansson is my girlfriend. I’ve got to leave this thread and go back to bed now...


32 posted on 02/01/2016 4:09:33 AM PST by Junk Silver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet

Not that she’ll be indicted, because she won’t, but for media talking heads to try and “analyze” data they don’t have is nothing short of comical.


34 posted on 02/01/2016 4:39:46 AM PST by ScottinVA (If you're not enraged...why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zakeet
Secretary of State Colin Powell, for example, used a personal email account from 2001 to 2005 in addition to his government account.

This stupid ***k just contradicted his own point. Powell HAD a government account.. Hillary did not.

35 posted on 02/01/2016 4:41:22 AM PST by ScottinVA (If you're not enraged...why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson