IRS: homosexuality is a choice, no tax deduction for gays contracting surrogates

LifeSiteNews ^ | 1/21/16 | Father Mark Hodges

[wagglebee]

Probably the first time EVER that the IRS has gotten something right.

[wagglebee]

Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

[PROCON]

Oooh, this will energize the Gaystapo.

[AndyJackson]

This is a loser. It’s a tax!

[WakeUpAndVote]

Will there be cake? No? SUE THE IRS!

[MrEdd]

Awesome.

IRS hates fags.
Westboro Revenue Service.

Let’s have them duel this out. It’s a win/win fight.

[Little Pig]

Unless they can prove that one of the two partners is themselves infertile and not through an operation, then both parents are capable of becoming biological parents. The choice comes in that they chose to marry someone with whom it is biologically impossible under all circumstances to sire a child. IVF is for couples who normally should be able to conceive, but can’t due to some malfunction. In this case, neither “parent” has any malfunction; their reproductive systems are completely normal.

[frog in a pot]

Oooh, this will energize the Gaystapo.

Substantially! The government is saying it is a choice, ergo, it is "correctable".

Further, now that it is a choice, there is no reason to not enforce statutes that say it is a bad choice.

[Luircin]

The only time the government is opposed to teh gehy is when they want to squeeze more money out of them.

[Vigilanteman]

Even the homo lobby cannot agree on whether or not their lifestyle is a choice, so why should the IRS take sides here? < /sarcasm >

Seriously, it is either a choice or a mental illness, probably both. It can't be neither.

[Vigilanteman]

Even the homo lobby cannot agree on whether or not their lifestyle is a choice, so why should the IRS take sides here? < /sarcasm >

Seriously, it is either a choice or a mental illness, probably both. It can't be neither.

[Alberta's Child]

Sooner or later, nature always wins — regardless of what Barack Obama, the U.S. Supreme Court, or some @ss-pirate advocacy group says.

[SamuraiScot]

Okay, what's their argument? That they tried their way to conceive a child, and it didn't work?

I seriously don't want to know the details. But the answer is no. Okay?

[trisham]

I’m amazed.

[GrouchoTex]

I’ve said all along that the Gay Agenda wasn’t about rights, it was about money and benefits from the government.

[Cecily]

“The IRS agent noted that Morrissey’s sexual orientation is a “choice.”

Somebody in government has escaped way, way off the PC plantation and told the truth.

[mrsmel]

And the perfect tool with which to go after true Christians. A murderers’ pride group just wouldn’t have had the same resonance and sympathy-seekng as a victim group (though they come awfully close with Planned Infanticide).

[Calvin Cooledge]

Why doesn’t one of them temporarily self-identify as female and get pregnant?

[Rusty0604]

CA requires health insurance to cover infertility for gays. Insanity!

[Night Hides Not]

Sooner or later, nature always wins — regardless of what Barack Obama, the U.S. Supreme Court, or some @ss-pirate advocacy group says.

Just ask the dinosaurs. I humbly predict that mankind will not be on the scene when the sun burns out a few billion years from now.