Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Probably the first time EVER that the IRS has gotten something right.
1 posted on 01/21/2016 11:48:49 AM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Absolutely Nobama; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; American72; Antoninus; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

2 posted on 01/21/2016 11:49:33 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Oooh, this will energize the Gaystapo.


3 posted on 01/21/2016 11:50:32 AM PST by PROCON (Proud CRUZader!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Will there be cake? No? SUE THE IRS!


5 posted on 01/21/2016 11:52:08 AM PST by WakeUpAndVote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Unless they can prove that one of the two partners is themselves infertile and not through an operation, then both parents are capable of becoming biological parents. The choice comes in that they chose to marry someone with whom it is biologically impossible under all circumstances to sire a child. IVF is for couples who normally should be able to conceive, but can’t due to some malfunction. In this case, neither “parent” has any malfunction; their reproductive systems are completely normal.


7 posted on 01/21/2016 11:53:34 AM PST by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

The only time the government is opposed to teh gehy is when they want to squeeze more money out of them.


9 posted on 01/21/2016 11:56:28 AM PST by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Even the homo lobby cannot agree on whether or not their lifestyle is a choice, so why should the IRS take sides here? < /sarcasm >

Seriously, it is either a choice or a mental illness, probably both. It can't be neither.

10 posted on 01/21/2016 11:57:07 AM PST by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Even the homo lobby cannot agree on whether or not their lifestyle is a choice, so why should the IRS take sides here? < /sarcasm >

Seriously, it is either a choice or a mental illness, probably both. It can't be neither.

11 posted on 01/21/2016 11:57:09 AM PST by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Sooner or later, nature always wins — regardless of what Barack Obama, the U.S. Supreme Court, or some @ss-pirate advocacy group says.


12 posted on 01/21/2016 11:58:28 AM PST by Alberta's Child (My mama said: "To get things done, you'd better not mess with Major Tom.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Okay, what's their argument? That they tried their way to conceive a child, and it didn't work?

I seriously don't want to know the details. But the answer is no. Okay?

13 posted on 01/21/2016 12:00:43 PM PST by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I’m amazed.


14 posted on 01/21/2016 12:02:38 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I’ve said all along that the Gay Agenda wasn’t about rights, it was about money and benefits from the government.


15 posted on 01/21/2016 12:02:43 PM PST by GrouchoTex (...and ye shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

“The IRS agent noted that Morrissey’s sexual orientation is a “choice.”

Somebody in government has escaped way, way off the PC plantation and told the truth.


16 posted on 01/21/2016 12:05:51 PM PST by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Why doesn’t one of them temporarily self-identify as female and get pregnant?


18 posted on 01/21/2016 12:10:54 PM PST by Calvin Cooledge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

CA requires health insurance to cover infertility for gays. Insanity!


19 posted on 01/21/2016 12:13:31 PM PST by Rusty0604 (1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
in vitro fertilization treatments and the cost of a surrogate to carry twin boys for himself and his male partner.

I'm sure there is nothing creepy about that. What could go wrong?

21 posted on 01/21/2016 12:16:33 PM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I see the surrogate is carrying twin boys. I wonder if there was any embryo sex selection at work.


23 posted on 01/21/2016 12:37:09 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I don’t see a reason for anybody to get a tax deduction for IVF.


26 posted on 01/21/2016 12:55:59 PM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

***LGBTQ activists are trying to get a legal ruling that homosexuality is genetic, innate, natural, and not a choice. ***

If a gay gene is ever found, I might agree with them. Not holding my breath though.


27 posted on 01/21/2016 1:10:50 PM PST by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

The gays should at least have to prove they’ve been trying to conceive, but haven’t been able to. Maybe their doctor could certify that they are infertile. Then our tax payers can pay for their surrogates.


28 posted on 01/21/2016 1:11:11 PM PST by Defiant (RINOs are leaders of a party without voters. Trump/Cruz are leaders of voters without a party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

The issue is simply that the medical payments were not for the care of the taxpayer or his family. Payments for surrogacy would not be allowable if the parents-of-record were a married heterosexual couple.

However, if a woman provided surrogacy services, any medical payments she made herself would be deductible, subject to the general limits on deductibility of medical payments, while any payment she received for the service would be taxable as income.

Perhaps Congress will attempt to enact a deduction for some or all of payments related to surrogacy. If so, they’d have to include all cases to get any backing.


29 posted on 01/21/2016 1:13:22 PM PST by Tax-chick (Alive, awake, alert, enthusiastic, and mildly hostile toward the universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson