Posted on 01/19/2016 1:46:43 PM PST by unixfox
Full Title:
Inspector General: Clinton emails had intel from most secretive, classified programs
EXCLUSIVE: Hillary Clinton's emails on her unsecured, homebrew server contained intelligence from the U.S. government's most secretive and highly classified programs, according to an unclassified letter from a top inspector general to senior lawmakers.
Fox News exclusively obtained the unclassified letter, sent Jan. 14 from Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III. It laid out the findings of a recent comprehensive review by intelligence agencies that identified "several dozen" additional classified emails -- including specific intelligence known as "special access programs" (SAP).
This is an excerpt.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Although it might never be proven, there’s no doubt in my mind that the nonsecure server was set up so that clinton could sell the classified information. The clinton presidency was marked by continuous sales; Loral, the missing laptops in the Los Alamos fire, and all of the dealings with China through its agents, the attempted sale of Long Beach port to COSCO, not to mention all of the local sales by the clintons themselves, such as coffee with the prez, Lincoln bedroom, seats on AF1, etc.
Why would anyone think a second clinton presidency would be any different?
I think it was set up so the Queen did not have to be bothered with carrying two phones. She could have carried a state department phone and a personal one, but she did not want to be bothered with stuff the little people had to do.
I don’t imagine it was anything more than that. Hubris.
How many classified emails does it take to get a Clinton indicted?
And lock her up!
Actually I am more in the camp that those emails just might show we, the Obama Administration, orchestrated the Arab Spring.
It must be nice to be above the law.
Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer was on WMAL radio this morning in D.C., he says these latest revelations involve information so extremely sensitive and off-limits, that Hillary recklessly put lives directly at risk. He did not hesitate to declare firmly that the classification level of these emails deals with stuff that is normally kept off even ultra-secure official electronic networks if possible, and hand-carried instead, because it has to do with dark operations in which our government does not even admit to being involved.
Furthermore, and obvious to most of us, the fact that Obama has run interference for Hillary and scoffs at/downplays the seriousness of all this means he must be publicly impaled along with her(not that there arenât already more than ample other high crimes and misdemeanors of which heâs guilty).
I agree w/that, which was the intent of pulling intel support, the easiest, cheapest and most plausibly denialed way to do it.
How it typically worked out there was that we had relatively tame dictator we supported. We’d assist in identifying locals who were intent on overthrow. Dictator goes in and kills/arrests them, with our “hands being clean”.
“Terrorism” was never limited to anti-west high rollers like al Qaeda and isis. There are hundreds of groups, most of which are bent on overthrowing the local gov. You’ll never hear about them in the news. Incidentally, this is probably why Condoleeza Rice wasn’t familiar w/the “al Qaeda” name in the beginning. Too many groups to remember off the top of your head.
So you pull that support and it’s only a matter of time for those groups to grow and fester. I would find it easy to believe that we also provided more active support.
So, anyone here care to weigh in?
Realistically, what is the mathematical probability that we will actually see an effective prosecution actually proceeding against Hillary in 2016, and not a white-wash?
“Pretty soon, if not already, others will be trying to cut deals in exchange for their testimony.”
This is what will be required to secure an indictment. Someone in the know will have to “turn.”
Depends on the integrity of James Comey. I pray he has the courage to demonstrate it.
CNN Jeff Tubin and co are basically saying no big deal, for sure I disagree, Tubin says the problem is that things are over classified, and he can understand how she might not know...Totally Bogus
Hillary wondered in another email how someone else had knowingly sent classified info on a private server whatever
For sure they CNN are going to protect her....oh it`s so confusing to really know what`s classified they say
What's your best guess about Hillary's 'future'?
So, what if this had never been discovered?
All that classified material in her possession... why? Once the position ended, what was her intent on having it?
Profiting from it, blackmail, treason?
Bumping Liz’s excellent work.
Hillary's screwed the pooch on this one.
She’z deflecting, attempting to marginalize this and act as if it's no big deal.
My guess, she’z prolly not sleepin very well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.