Why sure. Now that your ignorant Bastard is almost out of office, now is the time to finally get to the bottom of this topic.
If you can't explain how the word "natural" got in there, you aren't explaining anything.
I guess it wasn’t time when Obama was running eh NY Slime?
Where was this wrap that I wouldn't even use for my Friday night perch at when the Messiah was running?
What Constitution? Do we have one?
Look to Washington status for the solution. The requirement was custom made.
Just go back to the source documents that Justia removed.
Didn’t we have this discussion just a few hour ago?
Posted earlier:
It May Be Time to Resolve the Meaning of âNatural Bornâ
The New York Times ^ | January 18th, 2016 | By CARL HULSE
Posted on â1â/â18â/â2016â â2â:â06â:â18â âPM by Mariner
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200, 201-211 next last
I could never understand how no one in the United States had standing to sue regarding Obama and the question of NBC. I remember when the electors were tabulated there was a cry of “Hold On” or “No” or whatever it was, but other voices drown it out when an objection was being made to certify the results. The gavel was struck and the nightmare began.
Quite frankly, I do not see how some sort of expedited case of a judgement as to a particular candidate being NBC. I suppose the courts could say that it is up to the voters to decide...But the Constitution is quite explicit in naming the requirements. Congress has delineated what constitutes a naturalized citizen and perhaps what may be a NBC, but still the waters are murky.
Cruz might very well be NBC. But I wont take the word of a talk show host, nor professor at a University, nor the Candidate himself. I need a declarative decision by our Supreme Court. I may or may not like the answer, but it is way past time for this to be thrashed out.
I am not trying to start another row of he is, he isn’t thread. I am not trying to be a concern troll. I just want an answer and no one here on FR has the constitutional authority to give an answer as definitive as a Supreme Court decision.
121 comments on the above post of the same article.
The meaning is plain. Maybe it’s time to shut up with the nonsense.
What if you came out of a test tube? On the Island of Manhattan. In the year 2525. If man is still alive. If woman can survive. Until then? And... you came out of a test tube on the Island of Manhattan in a Sharia Law Enclave established by Hillary Clinton after nutjob fringe elements in the Republican Party got some idiots to sit home fretting New York Values and let her win?
Would you still be a natural born? Or? What happens when test tube babies are cooked up in a Obamacare hospital to increase the Democratic Party base via science as well as immigration? Are they natural born, albeit mass produced and handed a form to register as Democrat with a thumb print?
Natural born?
What if you are allowed to marry your dog? And science has advanced to the point where you can have a hybrid, with the dog? For example, the Democrats say that if it is love, it is ok. Can the hybrid run for President?
We should start preparing for such future events now. Because, it is going to happen.