Posted on 01/14/2016 3:58:41 PM PST by cotton1706
After confirming a liberal judge to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals earlier this week as their first act of 2016, Senate Republicans are prepared to confirm yet another liberal judge next week. And once again, they are sneaking it in as the first vote on Tuesday so that opponents can't mobilize. Welcome to Orwell's "1984" where the opposition party is not really the opposition party.
On Tuesday afternoon, Republicans will vote to confirm Wilhelmina Marie Wright, a sitting member of the Minnesota state Supreme Court, to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. Just who is Ms. Wright?
Writing a short entry for the UCLA Law Review in 1990 (page 18-19 of PDF), Ms. Wright brazenly asserted that, "[T]he practice of American racism is based on two principles: the sanctity of property and the belief in the hierarchy of races." She concludes as follows:
The failure of today's racial discourse is its reliance on the notion that property is neutral, that the deed to a suburban home is 'property' while the opportunity to move out of a slum is not. The fungibility of property can be no better exemplified than it is by slavery. The fact that our Constitution once recognized one person's very life and liberty as another's property should teach us the danger of letting property determine liberty rather than looking to liberty to define property.
If you want to know why every Democrat-appointed and many GOP-appointed judges believe the Constitution is unconstitutional, here's the source. They oppose the fundamental negative rights expressed in our founding documents, replace them with man-made positive rights for favored classes, and point to flaws with the settlement of our continent with regard to slavery as justification for upending the Constitution outside the legitimate amendment process.
(Excerpt) Read more at conservativereview.com ...
Somebody please remind me why it’s good to elect RINOs to Congress instead of ‘rats.
Then they can go back to counting their graft and kickbacks and trying to figure out why Trump is so popular with real Americans.
Owning property is racist because people who spend every cent they can get their hands on the minute they get their hands on it will never own property.
Like in his strong support of the Kelo Decision? Gimme a break!!!
“Somebody please remind me why it’s good to elect RINOs to Congress instead of ‘rats.”
Because they screw you a little less until you can primary them?
Because then the Tea Party caucus is in the majority party.
My Constitutionalist HR member is in the majority party because a bunch of RINOs from historically democrat districts squeaked in in 2010 and 2014.
Property rights are white and racist -
I wouldn’t expect otherwise from a Minnesotan.
Owning property is racist because people who spend every cent they can get their hands on the minute they get their hands on it will never own property.
****************************************************
I gots to buy my lottery tickets and sometimes I don’t have enough food stamps to last until the end of the month for me and my 9 children besides, all you rich honkies already own all the good property. It’s hard being a single mom you know.
If property is so racist and whitey then why do we still hear about “40 acres and a mule?”
What’s yours is mine and what’s mine is mine. < /libspeak >
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.