Skip to comments.White House Launches 'Task Force' To Combat 'Violent Extremism' [Aborting the 1st Amendment]
Posted on 01/09/2016 7:40:57 PM PST by Jan_Sobieski
The White House announced Friday afternoon that it is launching an inter-agency task force to counter the sharp growth in violent extremism in America, according to an announcement. As senior members of the Obama administration's national security team meet with technology leaders in Silicon Valley, the White Houseâs National Security Council announced that the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security would team up to launch a Countering Violent Extremism Task Force, according to the announcement. The White House background document accompanying the announcement does contain any specific reference to the types of "violent extremism" the administration seeks to counter.
The State Department additionally is set to launch a Global Engagement center that will "to place an intensified focus on empowering and enabling the voices of international partners, governmental and non-governmental, and shift away from direct messaging," according to the White House. Without mentioning Muslim terrorism by name, the White House said that these efforts are being taken in the wake of terrorist attacks in France and San Bernardino California. The meetings with technology leaders in Silicon Valley are aimed at supplementing this effort, according to the White House. The government and private sector partnership "will allow us to place an intensified focus on empowering and enabling the voices of international partners, governmental and non-governmental, and shift away from direct messaging," the White House said.
"Today's developments reflect President Obama's commitment to take every possible action to confront and interdict terrorist activities wherever they occur, including online," it added. The announcement comes just a day after the Justice Department announced that it had busted a terror cell in the U.S. that was being operated by foreign refugees who had entered the U.S. legally...
(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...
The fact that the new task force document accompanying Obama's announcement does not contain any specific reference to the types of "violent extremism" the administration seeks to counter, is a sure sign that American Conservative Gun Owners are what this task force is focusing on.
The CVE, "Counter Violent Extremism", was set up at the DHS with the assistance of the Muslim Brotherhood. Where we have the DHS, FBI or State Dept. engaged with the Muslim Brotherhood in CVE initiatives, these initiatives are
Going back further, in 2004, the 9/11 Commission, called for by Congress under Article 1, clearly depicted 9/11 involved jihad, Islamic terrorism, etc. MPAC was permitted to testify, challenged the terminology and had it purged.
The official lexicon of the FBI was void of any language of the enemy. More importantly, the definition of violent extremism was a definition which so precisely collapsed into incoherence it was not randomly possible to have it that precisely incoherent.
In 2009, the DIA [Defense Intelligence Agency] came out with it's unclassified intelligence review NEVER mentioned anything with the language of Islam - except at one point they said alQaeda, with an asterisk identifying alQaeda as an example of violent extremist organization. The enemy plans to defeat opposition in the "information battle space" (propaganda/subversion) by controlling the language and definition of terrorism.
In 2010, the official report on Fort Hood from the DoD - Protecting the Force, the original source of the term "workplace violence" [Page 4 or 7 of 26] Recommendation 2.6 a,b : Update Policies to Address Workplace Violence . This is the first example of government officials overwrite the facts on the ground with the "workplace violence" narrative to deny/conceal actual facts....right down to the point where the Fort Hood report never even mention Major Hasan.
In 2011, the CIA was told to stand down on some terrorism training, instead giving it to DHS in November 2011, CVE Training Guide for Best Practices which determined alQaeda as our biggest threat but no allowance made to discuss the doctrine of alQaeda, tying hands from fighting them.
2012 brings us to Benghazi. The reporting at the time made it clear that alQaeda attacked. No question about it. those same documents reveal the State Dept. spent the entire next day (9/12/12) coordinating with the Muslim Brotherhood of America (ISNA) and the OIC on the YouTube/Violent Extremism narrative and that's how they were going to move forward- knowing that this was disinformation from the very beginning.
In 2013 and 2014, West Point's Counter Terrorism Center came out with "Challenges on the Sideline - Understanding America's Far Right Wing" turning support for the Constitution into potential 'far right wing' terrorism as equal to terrorism committed by alQaeda.
This summer Coughlin was in Vienna Austria at the Organization for SEcurity and Cooperation in Europe and we were told at this official function that they think that calling Islamic State "The Islamic State" should constitute a hate crime. About a month later, Jeh Johnson, head of DHS said he would no longer refer to ISIS as "ISIS" or "Islamic State". Then we heard McCall, the Republican chairman of homeland security committee say the same thing.
The origins of the CVE do not come from American law. We know it comes from abroad. We know it is actual hostile because if you are doing CVE, you are NOT doing counter-terrorism.
As we witness Republicans institutionalize the CVE entity, we need to take the time to learn what it is, understand it AND TO OPPOSE IT!
No mention of muslim I guess their excluded
Death to Americans! - Hussein
Enough is enough. Impeach the bastard!
Drudge warned us last year the 1st amendment is basically gonna be ground to dust in 2016....
Enjoy your free speech while you have it....
“extremist” is the buzz word for libs the last couple of years.
“Extremist” = middle American moderate views we are now redefining as far right positions. Move the window of acceptable political and social viewpoints to the left.
Examples: Being for man/woman marriage = extremist.
Hillary Clinton, btw, according to the Dem Underground lefties is a corporate sell out because Wall Street backs her.
“Extremist” is another word that’s lost its meaning... like racist, Nazi, etc.
You mean Obama covering for Terrorist Acts in the U. S. may cost him his free ride?
Yes too many non-Muzlims are speaking out against Sharia & Islam.
Gotta keep these violent extremists down.
two key new sources of extremist threats to America...
1. the O whitehouse and
2. all of his buddies from IslamoNazi Krapistans he’s importing into America with our tax money
...and your encryption.
Is THIS the reason for all the Hickok45 crap the last couple days??
Fax them the address of every mosque in the county, you know, to help them out.
Impeach. Then REMOVE.
Repeat as needed. At least about 20 times.
Those who call for this will be named violent extremists...
The future must not belong to those who insult the prophet of islam.
That sure sounds like a threat to those who insult Mohamhead.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.