Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

If 7 years of consistent Islamic Terror in the U.S. and around the world has taught us anything, it is that the White House views American Conservative Gun Owners as a greater threat to the world than Islam. Obama's latest gun control measures do nothing to keep guns out of the hands of outlaws, but does set a precedent to outlaw guns from the hands of the law abiding. But why do we need guns? Shouldn't a peaceful people be able to find other ways to defend their homes and children? We need guns to protect our 1st Amendment rights. The right to speak our mind and to disagree.

The fact that the new task force document accompanying Obama's announcement does not contain any specific reference to the types of "violent extremism" the administration seeks to counter, is a sure sign that American Conservative Gun Owners are what this task force is focusing on.

1 posted on 01/09/2016 7:40:57 PM PST by Jan_Sobieski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Jan_Sobieski
The various new departments of the Federal Government that have been created in recent years to combat "terrorism" are going to be turned against us.
2 posted on 01/09/2016 7:42:44 PM PST by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

3 posted on 01/09/2016 7:42:47 PM PST by wtd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

Death to Americans! - Hussein


5 posted on 01/09/2016 7:44:07 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

Enough is enough. Impeach the bastard!


6 posted on 01/09/2016 7:44:28 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Impeach the bastard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

Drudge warned us last year the 1st amendment is basically gonna be ground to dust in 2016....

Enjoy your free speech while you have it....


7 posted on 01/09/2016 7:44:48 PM PST by GraceG (Protect the Border from Illegal Aliens, Don't Protect Illegal Alien Boarders...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

You mean Obama covering for Terrorist Acts in the U. S. may cost him his free ride?

Cool!


9 posted on 01/09/2016 7:46:24 PM PST by DoughtyOne ((It's beginning to look like "Morning in America" again. Comment on YouTube under Trump Free Ride.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

Yes too many non-Muzlims are speaking out against Sharia & Islam.

Gotta keep these violent extremists down.


10 posted on 01/09/2016 7:47:31 PM PST by Gasshog (Newly discovered element Trumpamentium causes a Chain Reaction of Testicular Fortitude!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski
Rule 1 in the CVE TASK FORCE HANDBOOK.


11 posted on 01/09/2016 7:47:40 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

two key new sources of extremist threats to America...
1. the O whitehouse and
2. all of his buddies from IslamoNazi Krapistans he’s importing into America with our tax money


14 posted on 01/09/2016 7:51:33 PM PST by faithhopecharity (Diff tween D's and R's is that the thatD's allow the poor to be corrupt, too. (O. Levant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

Is THIS the reason for all the Hickok45 crap the last couple days??


16 posted on 01/09/2016 7:55:53 PM PST by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

Fax them the address of every mosque in the county, you know, to help them out.


17 posted on 01/09/2016 8:11:34 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

LOL! Now the dumbass president is finally going to do something, anything, to combat terrorists. As long as they are not islamic.


21 posted on 01/09/2016 8:37:37 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (Obama = ISIS Fanboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski; Jim Robinson; elcid1970; House Atreides; John Valentine; dschapin; Yosemitest; ...
“Violent extremism” is in paragraph one and “including online,” is in paragraph three. The National Security Council and Departments of Justice and Homeland Security are in paragraph one. The State Dept. is in paragraph two.

Those departments are headed to paragraph three, “including online”, to find the ones they determine to be guilty of “violent extremism”.

What we do not know is their definition of “violent extremism”. After seeing Obama crying over gun violence while writing new rules to stop the sale of guns, I would say writings about guns on the internet will raise red flags of violent extremism. To accomplish their purpose, they are going to Silicon Valley to use computer smart people to search out those who indulge in “violent extremism” on line.

Silicon Valley searching the internet, will likely find Free Republic popping up along with other sites that feature independent citizens speaking their minds.

I think the internet police is starting.

22 posted on 01/09/2016 8:50:35 PM PST by Marcella (CRUZ (Prepping can save your life today))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

Does this mean if Free Republic is shut down our donations will be prorated and refunded?


32 posted on 01/10/2016 6:16:26 AM PST by Gadsden1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski

33 posted on 01/10/2016 6:40:17 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson