Posted on 12/14/2015 8:42:26 AM PST by marktwain
Abstract
The Victorian era was marked by an explosion of innovation and genius, per capita rates of which appear to have declined subsequently. The presence of dysgenic fertility for IQ amongst Western nations, starting in the 19th century, suggests that these trends might be related to declining IQ. This is because high-IQ people are more productive and more creative. We tested the hypothesis that the Victorians were cleverer than modern populations, using high-quality instruments, namely measures of simple visual reaction time in a meta-analytic study. Simple reaction time measures correlate substantially with measures of general intelligence (g) and are considered elementary measures of cognition. In this study we used the data on the secular slowing of simple reaction time described in a meta-analysis of 14 age-matched studies from Western countries conducted between 1889 and 2004 to estimate the decline in g that may have resulted from the presence of dysgenic fertility. Using psychometric meta-analysis we computed the true correlation between simple reaction time and g, yielding a decline of â 1.16 IQ points per decade or â 13.35 IQ points since Victorian times. These findings strongly indicate that with respect to g the Victorians were substantially cleverer than modern Western populations.
(Excerpt) Read more at sciencedirect.com ...
They attribute this to “dysgenic fertility” - which means more reproduction by those with inferior genetics, which is creepy.
Also, immigration advocates often say we get the more competent people from the sending countries, which benefits the U.S. If we assume this is true (and for many sending countries, it obviously is not), what's the result if we import the brighter fraction of a country with an average IQ of 75? (Unfortunately, there are such countries.) We're still getting people with a lower average IQ than our own native population. Getting these people lowers our country's average IQ, while losing these people lowers the sending country's average IQ. Quite the lose-lose proposition.
Also, I admit that IQ isn't everything, but it's a rough proxy for lots of behavioral qualities that an advanced nation needs.
They attribute this to “dysgenic fertility” - which means more reproduction by those with inferior genetics, which is creepy.
Just because it has become politically incorrect to talk about it does not mean that it is false.
...and yet that might be the very reason they were smarter !?!?!
The “explosion of innovation and genius” in the Victorian era probably had more to do with science finally reaching critical mass shortly before that time. I’d point especially to the Maxwell equations of electromagnetism, published in the 1860-61 timeframe.
We are killing off a lot a good people now in the past 20 years through constant war.
Great point!
Here are some embarrassing graphs...
... and here is an embarrassing list...
Ponder then why are there a growing number of folks that have taken up ‘steampunk’ as a hobby, an emulation, and an admiration for creative inventions that came forth from that period of time.
I submit the following as example:
Yeah, I highly recommend it, ranks among the funniest movies ever.
Here is the link to the National IQ rankings
http://www.photius.com/rankings/national_iq_scores_country_ranks.html
Highest Singapore 108 Next highest South Korea 106
U.S. 98 ninth place, tied with 8 other countries
Lowest Equatorial Guinea 59 Next lowest Saint Lucia 62
Yeah, and throw batting averages in there and Asians would rule the world.
Afghanistan |
84 |
Albania |
90 |
Algeria |
83 |
Azerbaijan |
87 |
Bahrain |
83 |
Bangladesh |
82 |
Brunei |
91 |
Burkina Faso |
68 |
Chad |
68 |
Comoros |
77 |
Djibouti |
68 |
Egypt |
81 |
Guinea |
67 |
Indonesia |
87 |
Iran |
84 |
Iraq |
87 |
Jordan |
84 |
Kazakhstan |
94 |
Kuwait |
86 |
Kyrgyzstan |
90 |
Lebanon |
82 |
Libya |
83 |
Malaysia |
92 |
Maldives |
81 |
Mali |
74 |
Mauritania |
89 |
Morocco |
84 |
Niger |
69 |
Nigeria |
84 |
Oman |
83 |
Pakistan |
84 |
Qatar |
78 |
Saudi Arabia |
84 |
Senegal |
76 |
Sierra Leone |
91 |
Somalia |
68 |
Sudan |
71 |
Syria |
83 |
Tajikistan |
87 |
The Gambia |
66 |
Tunisia |
83 |
Turkey |
90 |
Turkmenistan |
87 |
United Arab Emirates |
84 |
Uzbekistan |
86 |
Yemen |
85 |
AVERAGE: |
82 |
Is it not true? Morons with no jobs are cranking out babies because we subsidize them. Meanwhile the affluent and intelligent. are having fewer and fewer kids.
I wonder what the rankings were 50 years ago.
The old school anthropologists, mostly scorned by modern academia and lacking any knowledge of DNA, were more right than wrong on racial differences.
bmp
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.