Skip to comments.
Jeb Bush's millions aren't buying votes. Will money not matter in 2016?
The Week ^
| 12/12/15
| Paul Waldman
Posted on 12/12/2015 7:25:59 AM PST by jimbo123
A year ago, Jeb Bush's allies told reporters that they were preparing a "shock and awe" fundraising campaign in which they would amass such an intimidating pile of cash that other candidates might just leave the race lest they be crushed by Bush's gargantuan war machine made of money. True to their word, Team Jeb met its ambitious target of $100 million, then began to deploy it to sweep Bush's opponents aside on his path straight to the White House.
But as you might have noticed, something went awry with the plan. As The Washington Post reported this week, Bush's super PAC Right to Rise has spent $50 million, which has brought Jeb from his peak support of 15 percent earlier in the year to around 5 percent now, putting him in fifth place behind a reality TV demagogue, a doctor with zero political experience, and a couple of pipsqueak senators.
(Excerpt) Read more at theweek.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Florida; US: New Jersey; US: New York; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016election; bencarson; bush; chrischristie; deportjebbush; designatedloser; election2016; florida; jebbush; loser; marcorubio; mikemurphyfail; newjersey; newyork; righttorisefail; tedcruz; texas; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
1
posted on
12/12/2015 7:26:00 AM PST
by
jimbo123
To: jimbo123
2
posted on
12/12/2015 7:27:54 AM PST
by
P-Marlowe
(Tagline pending.)
To: jimbo123
If one looks back at the past bunch of elections, the numbers were pretty much the same and after a FORTUNE was spent in the generals.
maybe a handful of percent of voters aren’t sure six to eight months before.
Trump beats hillary by a few percent, maybe even 5.
pretty much in line with most current polls.
3
posted on
12/12/2015 7:28:12 AM PST
by
dp0622
(..)
To: jimbo123
The slimeball GOPe will give it their best shot at getting Jeb! nominated at the convention.
4
posted on
12/12/2015 7:29:52 AM PST
by
PROCON
(It's not islamophobia, it's islamonausea)
To: jimbo123
Trump took money out of this race
5
posted on
12/12/2015 7:30:13 AM PST
by
stanne
To: stanne
Trump has taken up all the oxygen in this race. Come on Hillary!
6
posted on
12/12/2015 7:32:04 AM PST
by
stocksthatgoup
(Trump and Cruz are not attacking each other. Why don't their follows take note)
To: jimbo123
A successful ad has a message and/or a decent product.
7
posted on
12/12/2015 7:33:38 AM PST
by
Calpublican
(Ryan = Boehner minus spray tan and alcohol dementia)
To: jimbo123
Historically 100 millions dollars could get a turd elected president. I have seen it.
Currently 100 billion dollars could not get another Bush elected.
8
posted on
12/12/2015 7:34:02 AM PST
by
hadaclueonce
(I thought Ethanol was the devil, now i find it is America is an Oligarchy)
To: jimbo123
Nothing biased in THIS story in Obola’s mainstream media is there?
/sarchasm - that gaping whole between a liberal and the real world.
9
posted on
12/12/2015 7:34:33 AM PST
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: stocksthatgoup
Well, Jen sure can’t beat Hilary. None of them are a sure bet. But Rubio would stutter. No way. Jeb? No. How about kasich?
Cruz is not going to beat Hilary. No
10
posted on
12/12/2015 7:35:38 AM PST
by
stanne
To: PROCON
The chance of someone named Bush ever elected as POTUS again is nonexistent. The GOPe knows this and they will try to nominate Yeb! anyway.
11
posted on
12/12/2015 7:36:06 AM PST
by
wjcsux
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
To: jimbo123
Bush's super PAC Right to Rise has spent $50 million, which has brought Jeb from his peak support of 15 percent earlier in the year to around 5 percent now, putting him in fifth place behind a reality TV demagogue, a doctor with zero political experience, and a couple of pipsqueak senators.Well hell's bells, Right to Rise, what are you waiting for? Spend another 50 Million so Jeb can get down to 2.5%!
12
posted on
12/12/2015 7:38:14 AM PST
by
COBOL2Java
(I'll vote for Jeb when Terri Schiavo endorses him.)
To: jimbo123
Jeb has already spent half of is pile with nothing to show for it.
He's a loser and so are his backers.
13
posted on
12/12/2015 7:39:01 AM PST
by
RoosterRedux
(Long is the way and hard, that out of Hell leads up to light - John Milton, Paradise Lost)
To: jimbo123
Jeb Bush's Millionaires' (who are buying influence via the Bush family) millions aren't buying votes. Will money not matter in 2016?The Kennebunkport Influence Peddlers are pretty tight with their own money, but not so much with anyone else's money.
Mr. niteowl77
14
posted on
12/12/2015 7:40:46 AM PST
by
niteowl77
("The truth is that this thing is not worth fixing up anymore.")
To: PROCON
15
posted on
12/12/2015 7:43:13 AM PST
by
jimbo123
To: stocksthatgoup
When the candidates complained to Joe Scarborough on Morning Joe that Trump was getting massive free publicity by just calling in, Joe invited them all to call in for the same free publicity.
NO ONE took him up on it.
Joe surmised that while Trump would take all questions for as long as necessary--even getting beaten up occasionally--the other candidates were afraid to do that.
If one is afraid of Morning Joe, how are they going to stand up to Putin?
16
posted on
12/12/2015 7:43:57 AM PST
by
RoosterRedux
(Long is the way and hard, that out of Hell leads up to light - John Milton, Paradise Lost)
To: dp0622
December 1979 (i.e., now) Reagan 33% Carter 62%.
December 1983 (i.e., now) Reagan 48% Mondale 47%
In August 1988 Dukakis was leading HW 49%-42%
The unchanging polls to which you refer apply to elections where nobody cares who wins (i.e., where it doesn't matter who wins).
In elections where real voters can be engaged by the campaigns, polls before October of election year are meaningless.
17
posted on
12/12/2015 7:47:00 AM PST
by
Jim Noble
(Diseases desperate grown Are by desperate appliance relieved Or not at al)
To: Jim Noble
you left out the past 4 elections. if those changed drastically that last six months, i’ll agree.
the idea that on one cared whethera republican replaced clinton is wrong.
18
posted on
12/12/2015 7:49:56 AM PST
by
dp0622
(..)
To: jimbo123
Maybe some of his lack of support stems from his refusal to prevent Terry Schindler from being horrifically starved and dehydrated to death by her supposed “husband.”
If he can’t be bothered to protect a handicapped woman, then who will he protect?
Meanwhile, Trump and Cruz are both talking about protecting the country. And right now, we need someone who takes security seriously.
19
posted on
12/12/2015 7:51:49 AM PST
by
exDemMom
(Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
To: jimbo123
20
posted on
12/12/2015 8:00:22 AM PST
by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY - Luke, 22:36)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson