Posted on 12/10/2015 2:15:09 PM PST by Isara
Texas Sen. Ted Cruz on Thursday offered an impassioned defense of his vote to rein in the government's bulk phone surveillance, blasting those in his party who he said wanted to "exploit the current crisis by calling on Americans to surrender our constitutional liberties as the only way to ensure our safety."
The Republican presidential candidate, who has been gaining in recent early-state primary polling, used a speech at the conservative Heritage Foundation to respond to criticism from two fellow candidates, Florida Sen. Marco Rubio and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, for his vote to end the National Security Agency's mass collection of phone records.
Under the USA Freedom Act, a law that took effect on Nov. 29, the NSA must get a warrant and then ask the phone companies for call metadata-information about calls, but not call audio-instead of collecting it itself. Rubio and Christie have attacked Cruz over his vote for the bill, attempting to cast him as a civil-liberties dove at a time when Republican voters want ever more hawkish responses to terrorist attacks.
"More data from millions of law-abiding Americans is not always better data," Cruz responded on Thursday. "Hoarding tens of billions of records of ordinary citizens-it didn't stop Fort Hood, it didn't stop Boston, it didn't stop Chattanooga, it didn't stop Garland, and it failed to detect San Bernardino."
Cruz called the now-defunct bulk records collection program "emblematic of the bureaucratic tendency to gather more, not better, information, which gives government tremendous opportunity for abuse."
"Like the fable of the scorpion and the frog," he added, "government will do what is in its nature-amass power at the expense of the people."
Defending his vote for the USA Freedom Act, which passed the Senate 67-32, Cruz cited Director of National Intelligence James Clapper's testimony to Congress in support of the bill, which Clapper said would improve, not weaken, the American intelligence community that he leads.
"Under the USA Freedom Act, investigators have more tools to target suspected terrorists, to access their phone records, to track down those with whom they've communicated," Cruz said. "Under the old bulk-data program, all of us were presumed guilty at the outset."
In a shot at Rubio and Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), whose bill to revive the NSA program Rubio co-sponsored, Cruz said his opponents in the surveillance debate were interested in "sweeping aside citizens' Fourth Amendment rights."
Speaking to a conservative audience in the middle of a heated Republican primary season, Cruz emphasized that he sympathized with the desire to collect useful information and protect the American people. But like many NSA critics on the left, he slammed surveillance hawks' focus on quantity over quality, urging a rethinking of how the U.S. spies on its own people.
"It is often not a lack of intelligence but a lack of perception" that stymies investigations, he said, echoing the findings of a congressional investigation into the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks that blamed intelligence-sharing failures at federal agencies.
"We should not shy away," Cruz said, "from smarter policies that enhance our ability to target the bad guys while protecting the rights of law-abiding citizens."
That means YOU Rubio.
It was epic. I learned pieces of history.
I never understand the promotion of metadata when they can’t name a single time, not once, it stopped something.
I’m an American who believes in the Bill of Rights, each of those ten rights equal in importance to each other. None is more important to another. All have equal importance, or they can be weathered down and lost, one by one.
Things like this are why I support Cruz ahead of Trump. I don’t think Trump values our liberties as highly as Cruz.
I think you’re right.
I’ve said this before: Between Cruz and Trump, for me, it comes down to trust. I can trust Cruz to say what he means and mean what he says. I can trust he will do what he says he will do.
I don’t feel that way about Trump.
-— I can trust Cruz to say what he means and mean what he says. I can trust he will do what he says he will do.
I don’t feel that way about Trump. -—
How does the candidate behave when his political positions conflict with his self interest?
Cruz has never gone along to get along.
Trump donated to Dems to get his projects done.
That’s enough for me, although there is much more.
bkmrk
This is the real measure for me. Men with principles and integrity are not easy to find in politics.
How soon then ? Will some of Trump’s cult followers might say “ The US Constitution ? We don’t care “.
Anyone ever wonder how many of Trump’s campaign staff are “ yes men “ afraid to speak the truth, or afraid to tell Trump the truth ?
Definitely not. Trump said he thinks Snowden should be prosecuted harshly and that he’s fine with the government listening in on his phone calls. Trump is firmly with all of the RINOs on this issue.
Kudos to Cruz for not backing down, weakening, softening or flip-flopping in the face of this very direct criticism on an issue. The idea that the government can spy on the entire population’s private communication data at will without a proper warrant is sickening, dangerous and BLATANTLY unconstitutional. The exact same arguments they make for doing it could be applied to spying on everybody through their computer webcams or other recording devices.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.