Posted on 11/03/2015 2:30:45 AM PST by servo1969
The Department of Education's office of civil rights says that a disguised boy has been discriminated against because he is not allowed to shower naked with girls.
Federal education authorities, staking out their firmest position yet on an increasingly contentious issue, found Monday that an Illinois school district violated anti-discrimination laws when it did not allow a transgender student who identifies as a girl and participates on a girls’ sports team to change and shower in the girls’ locker room without restrictions.
The Education Department gave 30 days to the officials of Township High School District 211 to reach a solution or face enforcement, which could include administrative law proceedings or a Justice Department court action. The district could lose some or all of its Title IX funding.
In a letter sent Monday, the Office for Civil Rights of the Department of Education told the Palatine district that requiring a transgender student to use private changing and showering facilities was a violation of that student’s rights under Title IX, a federal law that bans sex discrimination. The student, who identifies as female but was born male, should be given unfettered access to girls’ facilities, the letter said.
The boy should be given unfettered access to naked girls. What's confusing about that?
The district said she was allowed to change inside the girlsâ locker room, but only behind a curtain. The student, who has not been publicly identified, has said she would probably use that curtain to change. But she and the federal government have insisted that she be allowed to make that decision voluntarily, and not because of requirements by the district.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Does this mean that if I were to wear a wig and put on lipstick that I could indulge in my voyeuristic fantasies by showering with the girls? That’s just too easy. Next will be lipstick on a pig.
And liberals will tell you with straight faces that this is all good and fine.
Wow.
Anyone who resists this madness will be deemed a hater . . . and punished.
The Department of Education’s office of civil rights says that a disguised boy has been discriminated against because he is not allowed to shower naked with girls.
__________________________________________
Well, there ya go...
In other words, we see who the true bigots are:
“”This is not about the “dignity” of this arrogant, perverted boy, who was given his own changing room. He demands to see naked girls and for naked girls to see his male body, and he doesn’t care about anyone’s “dignity” or “respect” but his own.””
Just wait until the kid pops a woody!
Just build transgender locker rooms for the other 55 genders.
They can have their own transgender athetlic leagues too.
Fixed it.
The only way out of this insanity is to return and refuse all Title 9 funding and any other federal money. Federal money gives the feds far more control than the amount of money would seem to indicate but bureaucrats are addicted to "federal money." The local school board, indeed, every part of the local government will spend $100 chasing $50 of federal money. The costs imposed on local schools to comply with all the federal regulations outweigh the money received. I bet, though, that if a local district or a state were able to simply chop it off- refuse all federal funds- the DOE would descend on the offending school system and take it over directly.
If my daughter went to that school I would be in jail.
First, I would go to the Principal’s office and beat the hell out of him/her/it. Next, I would find the queer and beat the crap out of him/her/it. After that, I would go to the queer’s home and beat the crap out of mom/dad and dad/mom.
The time to simply quit blowing hot air out about a problem is over in my opinion. We are being driven to the point that words are totally useless and I would be damned if my daughter would be forced to shower with a queer boy because of political correctness.
At least, when I was in the jail taking a shower with “big bubba” I would feel “warm and fuzzy” just knowing how good it felt to beat the hell out of all concerned.
Signed: An undomesticated male.....
No other proof needed. Liberals are insane.
What if a person identifies as a dog. Would they then have the right to pee and crap in the street?
I wouldn’t be violent. I would just remove my child immediately and place her in either a private school or home school.
LOL. We’ll let you try that one and find out. My guess is, yes. The liberals would defend you.
When he takes of his disguise he abandons all claims of being a girl.
If he wants to shower in a dress, he stands a better chance of selling this BS.
LOLOLOL...that is so funny.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.