Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Office of Civil Rights says disguised boy has right to shower with girls
American Thinker ^ | 11-3-2015 | Ed Straker

Posted on 11/03/2015 2:30:45 AM PST by servo1969

The Department of Education's office of civil rights says that a disguised boy has been discriminated against because he is not allowed to shower naked with girls.

Federal education authorities, staking out their firmest position yet on an increasingly contentious issue, found Monday that an Illinois school district violated anti-discrimination laws when it did not allow a transgender student who identifies as a girl and participates on a girls’ sports team to change and shower in the girls’ locker room without restrictions. 

The Education Department gave 30 days to the officials of Township High School District 211 to reach a solution or face enforcement, which could include administrative law proceedings or a Justice Department court action. The district could lose some or all of its Title IX funding. 

In a letter sent Monday, the Office for Civil Rights of the Department of Education told the Palatine district that requiring a transgender student to use private changing and showering facilities was a violation of that student’s rights under Title IX, a federal law that bans sex discrimination. The student, who identifies as female but was born male, should be given unfettered access to girls’ facilities, the letter said. 

The boy should be given unfettered access to naked girls.  What's confusing about that?

The district said she was allowed to change inside the girls’ locker room, but only behind a curtain. The student, who has not been publicly identified, has said she would probably use that curtain to change. But she and the federal government have insisted that she be allowed to make that decision voluntarily, and not because of requirements by the district.


(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

1 posted on 11/03/2015 2:30:45 AM PST by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Why didn’t anyone tell me then??
2 posted on 11/03/2015 2:31:46 AM PST by cartan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Does this mean that if I were to wear a wig and put on lipstick that I could indulge in my voyeuristic fantasies by showering with the girls? That’s just too easy. Next will be lipstick on a pig.


3 posted on 11/03/2015 2:39:23 AM PST by jonrick46 (The Left has a mental disorder: A totalitarian mindset..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

And liberals will tell you with straight faces that this is all good and fine.

Wow.


4 posted on 11/03/2015 2:39:46 AM PST by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Anyone who resists this madness will be deemed a hater . . . and punished.


5 posted on 11/03/2015 2:40:38 AM PST by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

The Department of Education’s office of civil rights says that a disguised boy has been discriminated against because he is not allowed to shower naked with girls.
__________________________________________

Well, there ya go...


6 posted on 11/03/2015 2:42:12 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cartan

In other words, we see who the true bigots are:

“”This is not about the “dignity” of this arrogant, perverted boy, who was given his own changing room. He demands to see naked girls and for naked girls to see his male body, and he doesn’t care about anyone’s “dignity” or “respect” but his own.””


7 posted on 11/03/2015 2:44:17 AM PST by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Just wait until the kid pops a woody!


8 posted on 11/03/2015 2:53:14 AM PST by WellyP (question!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Just build transgender locker rooms for the other 55 genders.


9 posted on 11/03/2015 2:58:59 AM PST by Paladin2 (my non-desktop devices are no longer allowed to try to fix speling and punctuation, nor my gran-mah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

They can have their own transgender athetlic leagues too.


10 posted on 11/03/2015 3:00:31 AM PST by Paladin2 (my non-desktop devices are no longer allowed to try to fix speling and punctuation, nor my gran-mah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Office of Civil Rights says disguised mentally ill boy has right to shower with girls

Fixed it.

11 posted on 11/03/2015 3:00:48 AM PST by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
The district could lose some or all of its Title IX funding.

The only way out of this insanity is to return and refuse all Title 9 funding and any other federal money. Federal money gives the feds far more control than the amount of money would seem to indicate but bureaucrats are addicted to "federal money." The local school board, indeed, every part of the local government will spend $100 chasing $50 of federal money. The costs imposed on local schools to comply with all the federal regulations outweigh the money received. I bet, though, that if a local district or a state were able to simply chop it off- refuse all federal funds- the DOE would descend on the offending school system and take it over directly.

12 posted on 11/03/2015 3:02:13 AM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

If my daughter went to that school I would be in jail.

First, I would go to the Principal’s office and beat the hell out of him/her/it. Next, I would find the queer and beat the crap out of him/her/it. After that, I would go to the queer’s home and beat the crap out of mom/dad and dad/mom.

The time to simply quit blowing hot air out about a problem is over in my opinion. We are being driven to the point that words are totally useless and I would be damned if my daughter would be forced to shower with a queer boy because of political correctness.

At least, when I was in the jail taking a shower with “big bubba” I would feel “warm and fuzzy” just knowing how good it felt to beat the hell out of all concerned.

Signed: An undomesticated male.....


13 posted on 11/03/2015 3:05:43 AM PST by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

No other proof needed. Liberals are insane.


14 posted on 11/03/2015 3:05:44 AM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
"The student, who identifies as female but was born male, should be given unfettered access to girls' facilities, the letter said."

What if a person identifies as a dog. Would they then have the right to pee and crap in the street?

15 posted on 11/03/2015 3:06:12 AM PST by ETL (Ted Cruz 2016!! -- For a better and safer America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DH

I wouldn’t be violent. I would just remove my child immediately and place her in either a private school or home school.


16 posted on 11/03/2015 3:07:04 AM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ETL

LOL. We’ll let you try that one and find out. My guess is, yes. The liberals would defend you.


17 posted on 11/03/2015 3:08:08 AM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
Adult Fluffy Dog Costume
18 posted on 11/03/2015 3:14:37 AM PST by ETL (Ted Cruz 2016!! -- For a better and safer America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

When he takes of his disguise he abandons all claims of being a girl.

If he wants to shower in a dress, he stands a better chance of selling this BS.


19 posted on 11/03/2015 3:14:59 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Will Hillary's testimony on Benghazi be under oath? Baseball players were tried for perjury.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL

LOLOLOL...that is so funny.


20 posted on 11/03/2015 3:22:24 AM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson