Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Quantitative Easing and GOP Fear
RushLimbaugh.com ^ | 10/30/15 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 11/01/2015 4:18:26 PM PST by celmak

RUSH: This is Bill in Warner Robins, Georgia. Great to have you on the program, sir. Hello.

CALLER: Rush, quantitative easing and the threat of stopping it or tapering off, I think, is the reason why Republicans are afraid to have a government shutdown. I think either explicitly or tacitly, the Republicans have been told that the Fed would stop quantitative easing, 'cause it's the quickest and most direct way to go ahead and illustrate the impact of the federal government on the citizenry if you have the stock market takes a major hit. That's the only reason why I can think of this.

(Excerpt) Read more at rushlimbaugh.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Florida; US: Georgia; US: New York; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016election; bencarson; california; carlyfiorina; election2016; fed; florida; jebbush; marcorubio; newyork; qe; rushlimbaugh; rushlive; rushtranscript; tedcruz; texas; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Praxeologue

VERY interesting read; I remember that moment.


21 posted on 11/02/2015 6:53:06 AM PST by celmak (GO TED CRUZ !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: trebb

Fed policy is maintaining 0 to 25 basis points for one reason and one reason only. Stimulus. I have no idea what Todd’s point is.


22 posted on 11/02/2015 7:48:06 AM PST by jwalsh07 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Do you know what Fed Funds are? Why do you feel, at this time, that the current Fed Funds rate stimulates anything?
23 posted on 11/02/2015 9:16:51 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Yes I do. Do you know why it affects markets when it is raised or lowered?


24 posted on 11/02/2015 9:58:03 AM PST by jwalsh07 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

More to the point, do you deny the effect of the fed funds rate on broader interest rates and thus the economy as a whole?


25 posted on 11/02/2015 10:04:59 AM PST by jwalsh07 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Yes I do.

What is it?

Do you know why it affects markets when it is raised or lowered?

Currently, it would be strictly psychological.

26 posted on 11/02/2015 11:36:11 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

The FFR is the short term interest rate banks and credit unions charge each other when trading reserves.

Why does the FFR affect interest rates generally in real terms?

What is the spread between what banks pay depositors and what they lend money for currently?

Does ZIRP affect either of the above?


27 posted on 11/02/2015 3:40:08 PM PST by jwalsh07 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Currently, it would be strictly psychological.

Wow, up until this, I thought I was learning something from you.

28 posted on 11/02/2015 3:50:44 PM PST by celmak (GO TED CRUZ !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Which banks are borrowing reserves? How much?
29 posted on 11/02/2015 4:00:38 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister

Interesting article nicely describing stealth QE. I had read of it before on Zero Hedge but not is such great detail. Thanks.


30 posted on 11/02/2015 4:09:16 PM PST by citizen (America is-or was-The Great Melting Pot. JEB won't even speak American in his own home. NO Bush!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: citizen
There is no stealth QE. The Fed is not buying new bonds with the interest earned on current holdings. They are reinvesting the principal received on MBS holdings.

Keeping the balance sheet steady is not QE.

31 posted on 11/02/2015 4:23:19 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Of course it is. The Fed is supposed to be reducing their obscene balance.


32 posted on 11/02/2015 4:37:02 PM PST by citizen (America is-or was-The Great Melting Pot. JEB won't even speak American in his own home. NO Bush!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: citizen
The Fed is supposed to be reducing their obscene balance.

Yeah, it'll be nice when they do that. Until then, keeping the sheet steady is not QE.

33 posted on 11/02/2015 5:10:34 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: celmak

If the Fed raised the Fed Funds rate to 0.50% tomorrow, what would be the real world impact? Would it decrease loan volume? Why?


34 posted on 11/03/2015 6:17:00 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
If the Fed raised the Fed Funds rate to 0.50% tomorrow, what would be the real world impact?

The FED doesn't even have to raise rates to get a reaction. Heck, remember the last reaction that happened when the FED said it was thinking about it? That was in mid-August and the DOW went from around 17,500 to around 15,500 within two weeks!

35 posted on 11/03/2015 9:27:06 AM PST by celmak (GO TED CRUZ !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: celmak

Sounds like a psychological reaction......


36 posted on 11/03/2015 9:55:48 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Sounds like a psychological reaction......

Yep, and that's all that's needed from the FED to make people think that a downturn in the stock market is caused by the election of a Republican President; and the DemoRATs best friend come November 2016 is the FED.

People here are going to have to explain to the ignorant what is coming .

37 posted on 11/03/2015 12:24:12 PM PST by celmak (GO TED CRUZ !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: celmak
Yep, and that's all that's needed from the FED to make people think that a downturn in the stock market is caused by the election of a Republican President;

If a Republican is elected and the Fed suddenly boosts interest rates, to cause the market to go down, why would that help the Dems?

38 posted on 11/03/2015 2:35:53 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
If a Republican is elected and the Fed suddenly boosts interest rates, to cause the market to go down, why would that help the Dems?

Why did they blame Reagan in 1982 causing the House to lose 26 Republican seats that year, and Bush 41 in 1990 causing the House to lose 8 Republican seats that year? It would have worked with Bush 43 if it hadn't been for the 9/11 attack, or do you NOT remember the attacks they got for the market's downturn during those times.

The FED may have not raised interest rates in 1982 and 1990, but they were in control and played different games at that time that caused the market to go down (or at the very least, did nothing to try to stop the downturn). Don't you remember the headlines at those times, or are you too young to remember?

You seem intelligent, so you must know that these psychological games work.

39 posted on 11/03/2015 2:59:37 PM PST by celmak (GO TED CRUZ !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: celmak
Why did they blame Reagan in 1982

The Fed had to boost overnight rates to 20% in 1981 to finally stop double digit, runaway inflation.

It would have worked with Bush 43 if it hadn't been for the 9/11 attack

They were already cutting rates when he took office. They were 5.5% when he took office and had dropped to 3.5% before 9/11.

Currently, inflation is minimal. GDP is weak. There's no reason to boost rates so much as to cause the economy to tank.

And if they did, the Republican President would rightly attack them for it. And correctly pin the blame on them.

40 posted on 11/03/2015 5:07:52 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson