Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll Shows Trump Beating Clinton inHead-to-Head Contest taking 70% of Electoral Votes
Powdered Wig Society ^ | Thomas Madison

Posted on 10/22/2015 4:20:45 PM PDT by LS

image: http://i1.wp.com/powderedwigsociety.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/us1.png?resize=696%2C506 us1 The latest 2016 presidential poll has Donald Trump destroying Hitlery Clinton in a head-to-head matchup, 375 electoral votes to Hitlery’s 163. That is an astonishing 70% to 30%, and is very good news if you are a Donald Trump supporter…. and I am!

Based on an average of the RCP (Real Clear Politics) polling data from all the states and all the “head to head” matchups between Donald Trump (by far the winner of the GOP) and Hillary Clinton (The winner of the Democratic Party) shows bad news for the Democrats.

Clinton is losing handily in all the swing states, and is even losing Democrat strongholds of Maryland, Connecticut, and Oregon.

Read more at http://powderedwigsociety.com/trump-kills-hitlery-in-head-to-head-matchup/


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; clinton; election; election2016; electoralcollege; nationalpopularvote; newyork; npv; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 last
To: cradle of freedom

Yep, that is exactly true. In the past it didn’t matter as much because what the donors wanted and what the base wanted were not as far apart. But with the housing boom under Bush and the 10s of millions of Illegals Bush let in, the donors get a taste of cheap, reliable, labor (at least compared to the losers coming out of American high schools), and they want that labor to be PERMANENT...so now it’s AMNESTY for them, and nothing short and they’re willing to let the Democrats and the media do whatever it takes to achieve that end.

But that’s where they stepped in it. The question is whether we can finish them off with Trump - if we do, we may be back to a 2-party system.


81 posted on 10/26/2015 4:18:47 AM PDT by BobL (REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win (see my 'profile' page))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: LS

Bumping for historical purposes.


82 posted on 12/15/2016 11:26:59 AM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

This is basically where I expected it to wind up, but the tape basically is the only thing that kept that from happening.. without it, that was where Trump would have wound up.


83 posted on 12/15/2016 11:32:26 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

Eight states is how many they goofed up.


84 posted on 12/15/2016 12:02:41 PM PST by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Luke21

Trump was starting the hockey stick break away at the end of October. Without that tape Trump was on his way to a blowout circa 1980


85 posted on 12/15/2016 12:40:37 PM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

And he rebounded after they invested in the pinpoint data strategy. He stayed the course and within a week of the tape, his polls began climb back up, and then some.
They actually concentrated on specific demographics within zipcodes through strategic data mining. TV Advertising was highly target specific to programming.

The success of Jared’s data operations and Brad Parscale’s firm to target specific markets during those final stages of his campaign was unprecedented.
Truly remarkable. And Jared convinced Trump to spend the money on digital strategy. Trump trusted & valued Jared’s judgement.

Jared exerted a powerful influence over the Trump campaign - beyond overseeing the digital strategy, he dealt with the top-level hires. The close relationships
— and trust — among Parscale, Kushner and Trump helped convince a once-skeptical Trump that it’s wise to spend precious campaign on this data driven approach.

Even after the “Access Hollywood” tape scandal broke, Jared convinced the campaign to keep its ads up in rust belt states Michigan, Ohio, Penn. and Wisconsin
— all states Trump won. This analytics-driven approach led the Trump campaign to place ads in a dozen markets that Romney’s 2012 campaign never bought,
including Flint, Mich.; Greenville, N.C.; and Tallahassee, Fla. And it worked.

Within days of their specifically targeted ad buys, Trump’s poll numbers began to rise in relation to the specific markets.

FRiend, Are you at the Trump rally in Pennsylvania tonight?


86 posted on 12/15/2016 4:38:01 PM PST by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies ('45 will be the best ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies

Wish I was, but he’s on the wrong side of the state from me


87 posted on 12/15/2016 5:39:53 PM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson