Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congressional Review Of Copyright Law May Threaten Drudge Report (and sites like Freerepublic?)
Daily Caller ^ | 10/13/2015 | Kerry Picket

Posted on 10/13/2015 4:26:36 PM PDT by MarchonDC09122009

http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/13/congressional-review-of-copyright-law-may-threaten-drudge-report/

Congressional Review Of Copyright Law May Threaten Drudge Report Photo of Kerry Picket Kerry Picket Reporter 5:20 PM 10/13/2015

WASHINGTON — Congress may update digital copyright law affecting aggregator sites, like the Drudge Report and Real Clear Politics, along with news sites in the near future.

“Two years ago, the House Judiciary Committee launched a comprehensive review of our nation’s copyright laws, which have not been updated since 1976. As technology continues to rapidly advance, we have a responsibility to ensure that our laws are keeping pace with these developments,” Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte said in a statement.

Since March of 2013, the House Judiciary Committee has conducted 20 hearings, which included testimony from 100 witnesses on the subject of copyright law in the digital age. The topics range from fair use to scope of copyright protection to music licensing.

“The committee has been conducting a comprehensive review of U.S. copyright law to ensure that the law keeps pace with the digital age in which we live. The goal of the listening tour is to step out of Washington, D.C. to hear from creators and innovators in terms of what is and is not working for them in their various fields,” a committee staffer told The Daily Caller.

The committee staffer would not say how the laws would affect aggregators and news sites and said that only “all stakeholders are invited to come in and meet with staff in order to give their thoughts or express concerns. Those meetings are ongoing.”

Drudge Report site owner Matt Drudge told Alex Jones of InfoWars last week that copyright laws could very well end his popular site.

“I had a Supreme Court Justice tell me it’s over for me,” said Drudge. “They’ve got the votes now to enforce copyright law, you’re out of there. They’re going to make it so you can’t even use headlines.”

He explained, “To have a Supreme Court Justice say to me it’s over, they’ve got the votes, which means time is limited,” he added, noting that a day was coming when simply operating an independent website could be outlawed. That will end [it] for me – fine – I’ve had a hell of a run,” said Drudge, adding that web users were being pushed into the cyber ‘ghettos’ of Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.”

Drudge added, “This is ghetto, this is corporate, they’re taking your energy and you’re getting nothing in return – nothing!”

In July, Chairman Goodlatte and Democrat Ranking Member John Conyers invited witnesses from the Committee’s previous copyright review hearings as well as other interested stakeholders to meet with committee staff to provide additional input on copyright policy issues.

According to the committee, almost 50 meetings were scheduled and those will take several more weeks. Additionally, Goodlatte and Conyers announced that the House Judiciary Committee would conduct a listening tour as part of the copyright review.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: censoring; copyright; copyrightlaw; deathbybureaucracy; drudge; drudgeinterview; free; freerepublic; law; stasi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: MarchonDC09122009

How on earth can anyone copyright phrases used in everyday titles? Government moves slower than a snails pace and somehow congress thinks they can issue individual copyrights to every individual title published as msm news headlines - Fair use laws complicate this issue even further. sorry, I don’t see it - but am not surprised to see Congress wasting time on this.


21 posted on 10/13/2015 5:17:47 PM PDT by wtd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

FYI, I am an intellectual property attorney. Drudge to my knowledge violates no copyright law or, in my humble opinion, any fair trade or trademark law. Methinks this is nonsense.


22 posted on 10/13/2015 5:18:01 PM PDT by Smedley (It's a sad day for American capitalism when a man can't fly a midget on a kite over Central Park)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009
“I had a Supreme Court Justice tell me it’s over for me,” said Drudge. “They’ve got the votes now to enforce copyright law, you’re out of there. They’re going to make it so you can’t even use headlines.”

but he usually rewrites the headlines.

What about facebook, where they copy a photo, headline and first paragraph, exactly as is?

What about google, where they copy everything?
23 posted on 10/13/2015 5:28:11 PM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smedley
Was waiting for a comment such as yours. I also publish a newsletter and under fair use laws selectively use articles to the advantage of the copyright owners. How Drudge violates any copyright law by simply linking to a news or any source is beyond me. This is nonsense, but rest assured the elected brainless wonders will find a way to screw this up. I hope I am wrong.
24 posted on 10/13/2015 5:31:09 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: MarchonDC09122009

Nameing names would help. Most publications claiming copyright protection have a release permission sentence contained in the masthead or index that does allow article reproduction provided attribution and a link is offered as the source.


26 posted on 10/13/2015 5:37:18 PM PDT by mosesdapoet (My best insights get lost in FR's because of meaningless venting no one reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

Sic semper tyrannis...


27 posted on 10/13/2015 5:55:54 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smedley

I appreciate your personal and professional opinion on this issue.
However, legality and constitutionality doesn’t seem to have quite the sway these days.

The White House is orchestrating this copyright review in hopes of stealth resurrection of the FAIR act / SOPA, in my humble opinion.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2015/09/01/developing-2016-2019-joint-strategic-plan-intellectual-property-enforcement

Also note related concurrent global efforts such as TPP (Asia) and counterpart EU copyright law review of online Internet IP that would adversely impact news article content sharing.
Governments would relish controlling dissemination of comprehensive news and inconvenient content under the guise of protecting IP, even if it has a sude effect of killing off news content creators. News outlets will gladly be leaned on by gov’t to support the certainty of a copyright scheme securing their IP content.

Look at how many Healthcare providers supported Obama care which subsequently drove hospitals and doctor’s practices out of business, and has led to huge consolidation.


28 posted on 10/13/2015 5:55:55 PM PDT by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 100American

Thank you for sharing keionline.org - an Excellent resource!


29 posted on 10/13/2015 6:00:43 PM PDT by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

Enjoy, I only keep and follow reputable information sources...

Enjoy!


30 posted on 10/13/2015 6:03:10 PM PDT by 100American (Knowledge is knowing how, Wisdom is knowing when)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Why? We were told they were better than Democrats. Why on earth would we want to do that?

Unless the human garbage that browbeat conservatives here and elsewhere to get these people elected were wrong to begin with. And if thats the case, why are we not also holding THEM to account for lying about why they did it?


31 posted on 10/13/2015 6:05:55 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009
As technology continues to rapidly advance, we have a responsibility to ensure that our laws are keeping pace with these developments,” Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte said in a statement.

I agree. That's why EVERY SINGLE FEDERAL LAW should have a maximum 10-year sunset, at which time it must be re-authorized.

He explained, “To have a Supreme Court Justice say to me it’s over, they’ve got the votes, which means time is limited,” he added, noting that a day was coming when simply operating an independent website could be outlawed. That will end [it] for me – fine – I’ve had a hell of a run,” said Drudge

Not really. I've seen several times where his headlines aren't the same as the article he links to - more of a pun or short summary. If all his links were that way, there'd be no base for a copyright claim!

Also, I'm rather surprised Google hasn't weighed in on this much at all.. Linking is the main core of their business.
32 posted on 10/13/2015 6:19:52 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smedley

I agree with you. But, then again, courts have making such decisions.


33 posted on 10/13/2015 6:29:28 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009; Jim Robinson; All

Jim and all who care about FR and getting access to real news: we need to attend these two Copyright Review “Listening tour” events in CA on 11/09-10 and be heard.
Details below:

Goodlatte & Conyers Announce Next Locations on Copyright Review Listening Tour
House Judiciary Committee to Make Two Stops in California
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 13, 2015 CONTACT: Kathryn Rexrode or Jessica Collins, (202) 225-3951 or Stephanie Baez (Conyers), (202) 225-6906

Washington, D.C. – House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) and Ranking Member John Conyers (D-Mich.) today announced that the House Judiciary Committee will continue the Committee’s listening tour as part of the comprehensive copyright review.  The House Judiciary Committee will travel to Silicon Valley on November 9th and Los Angeles on November 10th.  These discussions are expected to include a wide range of creators, innovators, technology professionals, and users of copyrighted works.  The Committee held a roundtable discussion...


34 posted on 10/13/2015 6:43:02 PM PDT by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

http://judiciary.house.gov/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=D48A70CD-1769-4B09-BFE2-2F92954EB873


35 posted on 10/13/2015 6:44:51 PM PDT by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Carl Vehse
Traitorous legislation aimed at destroying the First Amendment! Hell cannot be made hot enough for the committee members who promote this legislation.

Obama said he'd fundamentally transform this country.

36 posted on 10/13/2015 7:29:34 PM PDT by dragonblustar (Philippians 2:10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

It’s been fun talking with you guys.

But the Ruling Class doesn’t like what we’re saying, so....*shrug*


37 posted on 10/13/2015 7:37:05 PM PDT by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl Vehse

Agree. We have gone way beyond our founders dumping tea. I loath this government and will do everything to preserve our republic. Unfortunately a good percentage of retard voters will vote this country into the cesspool if we do not unite and get serious.


38 posted on 10/13/2015 7:45:34 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Smedley
FYI, I am an intellectual property attorney. Drudge to my knowledge violates no copyright law or, in my humble opinion, any fair trade or trademark law. Methinks this is nonsense.

Copyright law seems fairly stable, ironically partially thanks to FR's test case from years ago.

If the law changes drastically from Congress, there could be issues, but usually the target is entertainment more than the news.

39 posted on 10/13/2015 7:49:20 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (Cruz in 2016 - No Trump. No Jeb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

Yeah, it would put Facebook, Instagram, Reddit and Twitter out of business as well. I wouldn’t worry too much.


40 posted on 10/13/2015 7:50:27 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson