Posted on 10/08/2015 3:22:19 PM PDT by Torcert
Proviso – for those who know the answer right off the bat this is entirely obvious. But there are new people to the fight for our God-given and Constitutionally affirmed Civil-Rights just entering the fray and so this is for them.
So why does the #nationalSocialistLeft obsess over this issue. It wouldn’t of helped in many recent shootings so it’s a pointless exercise if it is supposed to ‘solve’ this problem. So why do the gun gabbers keep circling back to carp on this talking point ad nauseam?
It’s simple to understand if one just works backward from the gun gabber’s ultimate goal – CONFISCATION.
Side note: please don’t bore the rest of us with the tired talking point that ‘no one’s talking CONFISCATION’. His majesty Obama has already praised Australia’s CONFISCATION ‘solution’ so that ship has sailed.
Registration is One step backwards from CONFISCATION, and one cannot have Registration without Intergalactic Background Checks QED.
Parenthetically - CONFISCATION cannot take place without a list of names and one cannot have a proper list of names without the government in total control over this particular type of private property.
We know this is the ‘Fatal sequence’ (in more ways than one) that has taken place with other repressive regimes that have deprived the people of their Civil-Rights. In most cases the Registration step is accompanied by earnest promises that Registration won’t lead to confiscation.
And of course, we know from bitter history that this is a BOLD faced LIE.
And we know that there is no way to enforce Intergalactic Background Checks without Registration.
That would be the next two or three steps if they ever get IBC’s. Knowing that these won’t stop any future shootings (that’s a feature, not bug for the gun grabbers) the clarion call after a shooting will be registration.
Many will argue that Registration IS CONFISCATION since yielding control over our God-given and Constitutionally affirmed Civil-Rights effectively renders them moot and I would tend to whole heartily agree. Thus the reason that Intergalactic Background Checks are so dangerous to the cause of Liberty, and the reason we need to fight them tooth and nail.
If no one is allowed to transfer a gun, data from the Intergalactic Background Checks will tell them exactly who is armed and what they have. And it can expected that after still another shooting (Do you see the pattern here?) the call will be for people to be required to register their guns.
For once the Government become the gatekeeper in obtaining a firearm it will be a matter of time before the process is ‘throttled back’ to those the #nationalSocialistLeft deem worthy to have their God-given and Constitutionally affirmed Civil-Rights.
That's a rather strange thing since people here usually have many interests and they make replies on a wide variety of issues.
You're just a one hit wonder aren't you.
Perhaps in the future you should consider acting like an adult instead of leading with a personal attack.
Your initial posting was an unwarranted personal attack on myself and others.
And of course when I refused to sink to your level of childish discourse you chose to continue your attack.
The fact is you are basing your attack on your false presumption of what I did not even mention.
Perhaps if you had tried an adult approach on the issue, I may have been more amiable to your comments. But you insisted on a hostile and boorish method of debate.
Natural right, not civil right.
Sockpuppet sounds about right.
Why not something like: “God given natural and Civil rights?”
Those rights would fall under both classifications would they not?
Civil rights, on the other hand, are granted, both by Constitutional Amendment and by legislation. Constitutional Amendments and Major Civil Rights Acts of Congress
Those rights would fall under both classifications would they not?
Which rights, specifically, are you talking about when you say "those" and what do you mean by "classifications"? Your question is very vague.
It is my firm belief that this nation is in serious trouble and arguing arcane but important issues like this distracts from what we should really be doing.
I agree with you that the founding documents only affirm our rights, not grant them. But the term of art these days is ‘Civil rights’ thus the phrasing I proposed. We cannot cede certain words to the left – ‘Common sense’, ‘Civil rights’ and the like.
Yet here you are doing that very thing! I give up. I've tried my best.
What are you talking about?
I’m still waiting for you to answer my question, you had several days to consider it .
Where exactly am I “doing that very thing!”
WOW! Just went through all of your replies since you've been here and you have replied on almost nothing but gun control/gun related threads.
That's a rather strange thing since people here usually have many interests and they make replies on a wide variety of issues.
You're just a one hit wonder aren't you.
WOW!
You just can’t seem to get over yourself pushing personal attacks...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.