Posted on 09/09/2015 12:19:51 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump said that while it was too bad Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis was put in jail over her refusal to grant marriage licenses to same-sex couples, people have to abide by the Supreme Court's ruling on the matter.
"Well, you know, she was released and that was good, and it was too bad that she had to be put in jail, and I'm a very, very strong believer in Christianity and religion, but I will say that this was not the right job for her," Mr. Trump said on Tuesday evening's "The O'Reilly Factor" on Fox News. ...
"Because we had a ruling from the Supreme Court and we are a country of laws and you have to do what the Supreme Court ultimately, whether you like the decision or not, and it was a 5-4 decision, whether you like the decision or not, you have to go along with the Supreme Court" Mr. Trump said. "That's the way it is." ...
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
RE: Her Deputies have been signing off on, and issuing licenses from her Department (to both heterosexuals and homosexuals) the entire time she has been in jail
I KNOW that the deputies have been signing them off while she was away, That’s the point I’m trying to ask — DOES SHE HAVE HER NAME/TITLE ON THE FORM?
From Newsweek:
http://www.newsweek.com/why-kim-davis-cant-be-fired-marriage-licenses-368902
“Davis could just resign But, according to her lawyer, she apparently isn’t interested in doing that. “The tragedy is that there are simple ways to accommodate her convictions. Just remove her name from the marriage licenses. Thats all she has asked from the beginning”
The way I understand it, the form has to have HER NAME, as THE elected County Clerk for it to be legal.
*THAT* has been her contention. She does not want her name on the form and it’s looking like, IT IS THERE, even when the Deputies sign off.
RE: . I suspect when Kim goes back to work, the problems will start up again.
OF COURSE IT WILL. AS LONG AS HER NAME IS ON THE FORM.
SOURCE: http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/04/politics/kentucky-clerk-same-sex-marriage-kim-davis/
He (her lawyer ) said his client would be willing to issue licenses if her name and title were not on them.
ALSO, IT SAYS FROM THE ABOVE LINK:
The state legislature could pass a law removing the clerks’ names from the licenses, but it won’t be in session until January.
(As I said before, they don’t have to wait for the legislature to convene, an impasse situation like this can be resolved by an EXECUTIVE ORDER from the governor’s office ).
Now, if all Kim Davis wanted was to showboat, why is she making this proposal? Is it bogus?
SEE HERE:
http://abcnews.go.com/US/jailed-kentucky-clerk-kim-davis-offers-remedy-sex/story?id=33532686
Jailed Kentucky Clerk Kim Davis Offers ‘Remedy’ in Same-Sex Marriage License Battle
EXCERPT:
The Kentucky county clerk, jailed for failing to follow a judges orders to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, wants her name removed from the marriage certificates, her attorney Matthew Staver told ABC News.
“Marriage licenses in Kentucky are required to include an authorization statement of the county clerk issuing the license. Some state lawmakers, as well as the Kentucky County Clerks Association, have suggesting having clerks’ names removed from marriage licenses.”
________________________
I personally believe that if HER NAME is taken off the marriage licenses issued to gay couples, she will not make an issue out of it.
That’s all there is to it.
Right, so after her election the job drescription changed due to the Court. I don’t agree with gay marriage but if part of her job has become an obamination to her faith she should probably step down.
Yes that excludes Christians from certain political offices under these circumstances; but until laws are changed by another Court outside of objecting, praying and respectfully protesting what else is there to do?
At most if she was elected, job changed and she’s offended unable to go on she at most might look for the remainder of her pay like she was still working and step down.
RE: but until laws are changed by another Court
Here’s the part that I find problematic in the above post.
LAWS CHANGED BY THE COURT?
Where in the constitution does it tell us that Courts have the authority to change or even make laws?
THAT IS THE JOB OF THE LEGISLATURE.
I am at a point now where I can't see a distinction between them. What we are facing now is "Nazism" with a different face.
Amen
Thank you. Somehow I feel the same way. i hope I am wrong.
It kind of reminds me of the “Pennsultucky” character on Orange is the new Black.
A show that I love...but which has, unfortunately, like”Caitlin” Jenner...contributed to this current fascination with transgendered people. Sick.
LOL, Pennsatucky. I watched the first 2 1/3 seasons, but like the guard who knocked up the prisoner, I kind of reached the end of the line with that whole crew and had to run away and never come back. Theme song is a classic, perfect for that show.
..for those conservatives attacking Kim Davis about her background, I wonder if they would do the same to
Norma McCorvey—both have rough backgrounds-———and are right to stand up to darkness...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.