Posted on 09/07/2015 5:39:18 AM PDT by cotton1706
Sounds correct to me. “pay up or be destroyed” is the ancient extortion/blackmail principle.
“I’ve gotten myself out of lots of trouble and have resolved numerous problems by keeping all backup!”
Throughout my career in my bottom file drawer I had a file with “CYA” on it. Came in handy a few times.
This example puts his democrat contributions in focus when he was building in democrat locations.
“I’ve ... resolved numerous problems by keeping all backup!”
Fondly referred to as the “Pearl Harbor file” where I worked in the 80’s.
Thank you Donald for continuing to do battle for your right to serve our nation. I greatly admire your sacrifice. You could live happily with what you have accomplished. But because you are a true American Patriot, you have decided to risk everything.
Bull, they gave big money to McDaniels in Miss. and have done a lot to oppose Boehner and Mitch’s RINO plans.
They’re 90% good conservatives.
They are weak on immigration though.
This is unimportant infighting.
David McIntosh and Jesse Jackson seem to be brothers under the skin. These overpaid, under-talented hypocrites are parasites, sucking their survival out of the productivity of others. That’s why they want JEB!, the stooge of the elites in this country, to be the GOPe nominee.
Made me laugh, McGruff. :)
A big BOOM from The Donald again!!!! You gotta just love this guy!!!! He is exposing ALL of their dirty little secrets!!! He has been on the inside of this for many years just trying to do business, I quite sure he has accumulated ALOT of ammunition to use against these political THEIVES, GO DONALD bring it on!!!!!!
Uh oh. Club for Growth is an employment agency for scammers.
“This is unimportant infighting.”
Kind of important to the recipient of the negative ads
And his supporters.
What’s ‘important’ about a group running ads? They want to influence the election and/or the candidates.
The ‘narrative’ is that they are spearheading a big assault by the Gope against Trump. And that ain’t happening.
Hurting either Trump or the CFG is a win for the RINO/Dems- which is why the Washpost started this divisive narrative.
Many of these groups/organizations have learned shakedown from the likes of Sharpton and Jackson. They have been doing it for years. They pander to both political parties to keep their governmental grants and contracts coming, regardless of the administration.
“Bloggers who start a blog with “Boom” are gay. Just my opinion.”
Agree. It is NEXT TO IMPOSSIBLE to top that level of gayness. We are a family website here, we need headlines that represent family values.
“these hayseeds never learn”
This is the essence of it. They never learn that Trump is always going to have a strike back plan.
“The ‘narrative’ is that they are spearheading a big assault by the Gope against Trump. “
And the GOP said they would play fair if Trump signed the non-compete clause (my term). Now I realize Club for Growth is not necessarily GOPe, but on this issue you can bet they are in cahoots, and along with others as well. Again, that makes this important.
I am not even necessarily a Trump person at this time, but I would love to see the GOPe play honestly for a change. Not likely. The cream has not risen to the top in the GOP in recent years.
No, they’re a great outfit that backs fiscal conservatives, which Trump is not as far as I can tell.
These Tea Party/Red State.com types selectively cite The Club for Growth when it suits their purposes. If the Club gives their candidate strong ratings, then its the definitive proof their candidate is rock solid and must never again be questioned. If the Club gives their candidate "bleh" ratings, then the Club is a "sellout" to "the GOPE" and cannot be trusted.
For example, in 2008, Huckabee had a much weaker rating from the Club than Fred Thompson, Ron Paul, and Duncan Hunter. They loudly and continually cited the Club's verdict as proof that Huckabee sucked.
But in 2012, Newt Gingrich had a much weaker rating from the Club than Rick Santorum and Ron Paul. Did this affect their talking point that Newt was the conservative savior who would fight to get the economy back on track? Of course not. They just ignored and dismissed the Club's evalations and continuing their talking points that Santorum was "a big government social conservative" (even though Santorum had opposed all the government schemes like the bailout and porkulus) and continued to argue that Newt was the unflappable principled limited government guy (even though Newt had caved and endorsed porkulus, global warming scams, etc.)
The Club for Growth's evaluation is only important to them when it suits their purpose.
When I worked in the Civil Service, my boss told me that I should make a "memo to the files" comment in the desk calendar page, as to any phone call or incident above the normal B/S.
He said that at least you have some kind of paper trail for the courts or higher ups instead of just a "He said, she said" scenario. It worked for me one time - as soon as I showed up with the calendar, the issue was "resolved" (i.e. dropped like a rock).
“Its like God WANTS him to win.”
If other Republicans fought back they would get the magic too. Trump refuses to cower as most Republicans would
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.