Posted on 08/19/2015 12:21:26 PM PDT by jazusamo
(Washington, DC ) Judicial Watch announced that the State Department asserts in its most recent filing with the court the State Department did not issue personal computing devices to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and possibly destroyed the Blackberries of her aides Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills:
[The State Department] does not believe that any personal computing device was issued by the Department to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and has not located any such device at the Department. [The State Department] believes that Ms. Mills and Ms. Abedin were each issued BlackBerry devices. [The State Department] has not located any such device at the Department Because the devices issued to Ms. Mills and Ms. Abedin would have been outdated models, in accordance with standard operating procedures those devices would have been destroyed or excessed.
State did identify the state.gov email accounts of Mills, Abedin and two other former officials, but stated that Clinton did not use a state.gov account.
The filing follows the recent court order granting Judicial Watchs request for a hearing this week, on Thursday, August 20, 2015 at 12:00 p.m., which had previously been scheduled for September. State recently sought a one-week extension from the court, and the judge denied it (the court changed the time of the hearing to 1 p.m.)
The questions just keep popping up. Every time the State Department tries to justify its stonewalling, one more bit of information arises, said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. If the State Department was not providing secure email devices to Mrs. Clinton, who was? Best Buy? Target? Mrs. Clinton clearly did whatever she wanted, without regard to national security or federal records keeping laws.
The developments come in a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit that seeks records about the controversial employment status of Huma Abedin, the former Deputy Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ( Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-01363)). The lawsuit was reopened because of revelations about Hillary Clintons email records.
Imagine if you can Ike sending the Nazi’s D-Day plans
...and who was in charge of the State Department? Why of course Hillary.
Law firm representing Hillary has ties to State Dept.
Check out article and # 26.
Everybody is in bed with everyone else. ... As Laz says..."
The next POTUS is going to need to fire ALL agency heads, and 200,000 underlings.
Thank you kindly.
I think you might be on to something there......
Obama’s State Department is a 3rd world incompetent outfit.
exactly
If her name was not Clinton, Obama etc or in the establishment she would be gone and jailed, instead she runs for President and still people would vote for her and even Obama after all their corruption , targeting political enemies , lying, etc
Is Catherine/Kate Ducal any relation to Bill Clinton pal Fred Duval?
Bunch of BS as far as I’m concerned.
Judiciary Chair Sen Charles Grassley has been on this for ages.
Poor Chuck..
Excuse my naivete, but this would seem to mean that the Secretary of State was wandering around the world for FOUR YEARS using an unsecured blackberry to conduct business. Tell me I’m mistaken. Please.
>Ever wonder why so many serious hacks and leaks have occurred under this Administration?
It’s because the NSA demanded that everything secure be broken so they could get into it. And thus, everyone else could get into it too.
The NSA has done more to undermine US security than Hillary and Obama combined, not an exaggeration. The entire organization needs a full housecleaning, if not to be eliminated entirely, with its functions absorbed by DoD.
I believe her maiden name is Saudek, ... and she may have some unclaimed property in VT. ;)
You are correct. hillaey Espionage Clinton made all of our national secrets as easy to access as she possibly could.
And all she got was a few billion dollars for it. .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.