Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHAT THE HECK HAPPENED TO THE 2006 SECURE BORDER FENCE ACT?
100% FED Up ^ | Aug 16, 2015 | 100% FED Up

Posted on 08/17/2015 6:55:59 PM PDT by dontreadthis

Remember the promise of a fence on our southern border? Yes, it was the plan but the $1.2 billion dollar plan was never executed as proposed. You can thank our Liar in Chief and a popular Republican for that…

WE RECENTLY POSTED THIS VIDEO OF AN IMMIGRATION OFFICIAL SAYING BUILDING A BORDER FENCE “ISN’T POSSIBLE” EVEN THOUGH $1.2 BILLION WAS GIVEN IN 2006 FOR A FENCE:

(VIDEO)

In his speech in El Paso on immigration reform on May 10, 2011, Obama declared that the fence along the border with Mexico is “now basically complete.” Like much of what comes out of the Obama administration, that was a lie. What was supposed to be built was a double layered fence with barbed-wire on top, and room for a security vehicle to patrol between the layers. Except for 36 of the seven-hundred mile fence, what was built looks like the picture above or the one below.

But that doesn’t stop your liar in chief. He claims.

“We have gone above and beyond what was requested by the very Republicans who said they supported broader reform as long as we got serious about enforcement,” Obama said. “All the stuff they asked for, we’ve done. But even though we’ve answered these concerns, I’ve got to say I suspect there are still going to be some who are trying to move the goal posts on us one more time.”

Maybe he’s right–the goal posts were moved, but to make the job easier.

The Secure Fence Act was introduced on Sept. 13, 2006 by Rep Peter King (R-NY) and passed Congress on a bi-partisan basis. In the House of Representatives, the Fence Act passed 283 -138 on September 14, 2006. On September 29, 2006, the Fence Act passed in the Senate 80 -19. The Secure Fence Act of 2006’s goal was to help secure America’s borders to decrease illegal entry, drug trafficking, and security threats by building 700 miles (1,100 km) of physical barriers along the Mexico-United States border. Additionally, the law authorized more vehicle barriers, checkpoints, and lighting as well as authorizing the Department of Homeland Security to increase the use of advanced technology such as cameras, satellites, and unmanned aerial vehicles to reinforce infrastructure at the border. So far less than 40 miles of a real fence have been built – most of it during the Bush Administration.

Of the almost 700 miles of fencing, DHS reports there are currently 36.3 miles of double-layered fencing, as the bill required, the kind with enough gap that you can drive a vehicle between the layers. But the majority of the fencing erected has been made from vehicle barriers with single-layer pedestrian fencing, the kind of barriers that are designed to stop vehicles rather than people. The design specifications vary, depending on geography and climate characteristics, but according to the Customs and Border Patrol website, those include ‘post on rail’ steel set in concrete; steel picket-style fence set in concrete; vehicle bollards similar to those found around federal buildings; ‘Normandy; vehicle fence consisting of steel beams; and concrete jersey walls with steel mesh.

(PHOTO)

The first blow against the promised fence was made by Kay Bailey Hutchison, Republican Senator from Texas, at the urging of DHS she proposed an amendment to give the Department discretion to decide what type of fence was appropriate in different areas. The law was amended to read, “Nothing in this paragraph shall require the Secretary of Homeland Security to install fencing, physical barriers, roads, lighting, cameras, and sensors in a particular location along an international border of the United States, if the Secretary determines that the use or placement of such resources is not the most appropriate means to achieve and maintain operational control over the international border at such location.” Hutchison’s amendment was included in a federal budget bill in late 2007 despite the fact that Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., had a cow…he argued the amendment effectively killed the border fence promised in the 2006 bill, he was right. Hutchison’s intentions may have been honorable, but she didn’t foresee Barack Obama being the next president.

When Janet Napolitano became Obama’s first DHS she took advantage of Ms. Hutchison’s 2007 amendment, instead of building a fence which look something like the below, she built a fence that was mostly a combination of the two pictures above.

(PHOTO)

When She was still Governor of Arizona Janet Napolitano said, “You show me a 50-foot wall, and I’ll show you a 51-foot ladder at the border.”

And she may be right The fence will never STOP all illegal crossings. The purpose of the fence is two-fold, slowing the intruders and making them visible to members of the border patrol. The rest of the work is done by human beings.

Very little of the Israeli separation barrier erected to keep out terrorists is a wall, most of the 400 miles of the barrier which has received so much international scorn is a two layered fence like section of their barrier below. The fence has served its purpose, in 2002, the year before construction started, 457 Israelis were murdered; in 2009, 8 Israelis were killed.

The reason it has been effective is not simply the fence itself but how the fence is guarded and patrolled. And that’s what will make our fence along the Mexican border work.

Here’s the bottom line. Back in 2006 the people of the U.S. were promised a border fence. Since then thanks to Kay Bailey Hutchison and Barack Obama 95% of the fence wasn’t built. The arguments against the fence are bogus especially if you look at Israel’s history. It’s time for America to demand that its leaders build the fence they promised. No one can honestly say it wont work, after all it hasn’t been tried.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2006; aliens; securefenceact; whereisthefence
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: dontreadthis

Still miss that bastard GW Bush who rode around in a border patrol dune buggy, visited a lettuce packing plant, and tried to force mass amnesty down our throats? Me neither.


21 posted on 08/17/2015 8:57:52 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

They ran out of barbed wire.


22 posted on 08/17/2015 10:27:02 PM PDT by Minutemen ("It's a Religion of Peace")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

How about making companies file E check documents when they file their taxes? Would that help?


23 posted on 08/17/2015 10:36:34 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra (Don't touch that thing Don't let anybody touch that thing!I'm a Doctor and I won't touch that thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

I’m not familiar with that. If you would like to elaborate, the floor is yours.


24 posted on 08/17/2015 11:06:59 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

Let’s make this simple. Allocate the billions required and then state the time limit (three years), then add an incentive....if the wall isn’t completed in three years, then Congress/Senate cannot reopen for regular business and all DC figures must return to their home states until the project is actually completed. No TV appearance time, no public interviews.


25 posted on 08/17/2015 11:09:30 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

Do I have the wrong name for the program? Business owners must check to be sure their workers are legal. It’s late, and I’m tired, I may have things messed up! E Verify?


26 posted on 08/17/2015 11:17:57 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra (Don't touch that thing Don't let anybody touch that thing!I'm a Doctor and I won't touch that thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

I’m a bit tired too. You mentioned something I’ve never heard of and gave you the podium. Sleep on it.


27 posted on 08/17/2015 11:21:04 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South

Interesting a GOP Senartor from a “conservative” border state took the lead in killing the fence.
****************************
KBHutchinson was nothing but a John Cornyn in a dress. Both huge RINOS and beholdened to big government control and the Cheap Labor Express.


28 posted on 08/18/2015 1:14:21 AM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: octex; Soul of the South
A lot of people are confused about this.

Sen Hutchinson's position on the fence was to represent the Texas Farm Bureau, who were opposed to the amount of land that would be stranded behind the fence, and much of that land was owned by farmers, whose use of the land would be impacted, lowering the value of the land.

In Texas, landowners who have their property stranded behind a fence or road receive compensation to offset the lowering of the property value, but the feds refused to compensate these landowners so many lawsuits were filed.

When they build a fence on a land border and the border is a straight line, stranded property is not a problem.

But in Texas where the border is a meandering river, lots of land will be stranded behind the fence.

29 posted on 08/18/2015 3:30:03 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

30 posted on 08/18/2015 4:01:41 AM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not A Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

They spent it on food stamps and Spanish language text books.


31 posted on 08/18/2015 4:36:23 AM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag ( Anything FREELY-GIVEN by the government was TAKEN from someone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

CONgre$$.

ZERO representation.

CONS living large…

http://www.usdebtclock.org


32 posted on 08/18/2015 4:48:52 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Innovation continues..........


33 posted on 08/18/2015 5:10:29 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport

http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/politics/2014/09/24/fourth-center-to-house-undocumented-families-to-be-built-in-dilley-tx-officials/

September 24, 2014

Fourth center to house undocumented families to be built in Dilley, TX, officials say

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced Tuesday that a fourth center to house
families apprehended while crossing the Southwest border into the U.S. will eventually hold
2,400 people in Texas.

ICE will operate the residential facility when it opens in November in Dilley, Texas, about
70 miles southwest of San Antonio. It will house immigrant adults with children caught
entering the country illegally.

The South Texas Family Residential Center will be the fourth such facility, three of
which have opened in recent months following a surge in the number of immigrant families
crossing the Southwest border. It’s meant to expedite their return to their home countries
and deter others from embarking on the journey, according to a statement from ICE. Other centers have opened in Karnes City and Artesia, New Mexico.
There had been one existing facility for immigrant families in Leesport, Pennsylvania.

end snip


34 posted on 08/18/2015 5:17:08 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

Pretty much the same thing that happened to the promises Reagan received in exchange for his amnesty in 1984: Congress had no intention of ever following through.


35 posted on 08/18/2015 5:31:27 AM PDT by Ingtar (Capitulation is the enemy of Liberty, or so the recent past has shown.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

Kay Bailey Hutchison and the GOP defunded the fence.

See, the GOP can defund things when they want to.

Had they built the fence there would be about 6 million less illegals here now.


36 posted on 08/18/2015 5:33:13 AM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

“We have gone above and beyond what was requested...”

That’s the exact same phrase Hillary uses.


37 posted on 08/18/2015 5:50:45 AM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

“More to the point, the Corporations and the Bureaucracy want the illegals.”

True, but what motivates the liberal media?


38 posted on 08/18/2015 8:36:31 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: odawg

True, but what motivates the liberal media?


They want the Bureaucracy, luv the idea of diversity and are owned by the Corporations.


39 posted on 08/18/2015 8:39:30 AM PDT by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

Now that liberals and GOPe’s are faced with Trump - a man WHO WANTS TO SECURE THE BORDERS... for real... we see their true colors.

We can also see their past lies for what they were... Democrats and GOPe’s NEVER planned on securing the border... Their ‘plans’ were lies to get elected on - and nothing more.


40 posted on 08/18/2015 8:50:49 AM PDT by GOPJ (Research facilities aren't using two million pounds of dead babies a year. Who's got the rest ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson