Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama on nuke deal: I stand by my comparison of Republicans to Iranian hardliners
Hotair ^ | 08/10/2015 | AllahPundit

Posted on 08/10/2015 9:16:38 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

As a young Barack Obama once said at the 2004 Democratic convention: There are no “blue states” and “red states,” there are only blue states and states that make “common cause” with anti-American fanatics.

The White House should pick a smear and settle on it. Are critics of his terrible nuclear deal warmongering nutcases like the worst elements in Iran or are they treacherous Jews secretly loyal to Israel?

“What I said is absolutely true factually. The truth of the matter is, inside of Iran, the people most opposed to the deal are the Revolutionary Guard, the Quds force, hard-liners who are implacably opposed to any cooperation with the international community,” Obama said in an interview that will air on “Fareed Zakaria GPS” on Sunday. “The reason that Mitch McConnell, and the rest of the folks in his caucus who opposed this, jumped out and opposed this before they even read it, before it was even posted, is reflective of an ideological commitment not to get a deal done. In that sense they do have much more in common with the hardliners who are much more satisfied with the status quo.”

Republicans dislike the deal because it does too little to prevent an Iranian bomb, the Quds Force dislikes it because they think it does too much, and Obama’s conclusion from that is, “See? They both dislike it.” This is a revealing paragraph, though, insofar as it shows what his true goal in all of this was. Why Republicans oppose the final agreement, and in some cases have opposed the entire negotiation process, is irrelevant to him. Some GOP hawks think that the deal’s a sellout because it’ll shrink Iran’s “breakout” capacity to nothing within 10 years; others refuse to make deals with a terrorist state with American blood on its hand on principle, accepting nothing short of regime change instead. Others might have opposed the deal from the outset either because they thought — correctly — that Obama’s a weak negotiator who’d get rolled or because Obama himself abandoned the ostensible goal of dismantling Iran’s nuclear program long ago for the lesser goal of merely extending the “breakout” period.

All of this is beside the point for O, partly because he’s a partisan and partisans view their opponents’ motives in the simplest, most self-serving terms and partly because “getting a deal done” was itself the supreme goal of this process for him, far beyond the consequences for Iran’s nuclear program. I’m a broken record on this subject but I’ll say it again: The point of negotiating with Iran wasn’t to prevent an Iranian bomb, it was to prevent potential war between the U.S. and Iran over its nuclear program. Now that there’s a written agreement in place with lots of bells and whistles about inspections and international dispute resolution mechanisms, the pressure is off Obama to do something militarily before he leaves office to stop Iran’s nuclear advances. He’s stopped them by diplomacy — for 10 years, at which point it’ll be full speed ahead again at a breakneck pace, but at least he won’t be the one in office forced to clean up that mess. What you’re seeing in this answer is Obama at his insufferable worst as Captain Reasonable, the man with a strong “ideological commitment” of his own to “dialogue” and getting a deal done at any cost even if it means gifting an expansionist Islamist regime with an atomic bomb who nonetheless feels entitled to sniff at his opponents’ petty ideological obstructionism.

Oh, by the way, in case you’re under the media-created mistaken impression that Chuck Schumer’s opposition to Obama’s Iran deal means anything apart from “Democrats are conflicted about this unpopular deal!” kabuki, Claire McCaskill assured America this weekend that Schumer’s opinion won’t stop the rest of the party from falling in line for Obama. The deal will pass thanks to Schumer’s timidity and, of course, the Senate GOP’s treachery, led by a guy who wants you to believe that he’s really quite angry about what the U.S. has agreed to here.

CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE VIDEO



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; US: California; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bradsherman; california; chuckschumer; eliotengel; iran; iraniannukes; israel; lebanon; newyork; nukedeal; obama; republicans; steveisrael; upchuckschumer; waronterror

1 posted on 08/10/2015 9:16:38 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So Schumer is now a Republican hard liner?


2 posted on 08/10/2015 9:19:37 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

In other words, “those that oppose me are enemies of the state!”

I’ve heard similar sentiments from Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Pol Pot, Castro, Maduro/Chavez and yes, even Hitler.


3 posted on 08/10/2015 9:21:25 AM PDT by CSM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He’s such a POS!


4 posted on 08/10/2015 9:24:19 AM PDT by Empireoftheatom48 (God help the Republic but will he?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I stand by my comparison of Obama to Hitler and his being a supreme a-hole....: )


5 posted on 08/10/2015 9:25:33 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So Obama like Republicans? He’s all buddy-buddy with Iran, after all.


6 posted on 08/10/2015 9:26:13 AM PDT by Politicalkiddo ("Fools are my theme, let satire be my song."- Lord Byron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Obama sided with the Iranian hardliners the only time it really mattered. When the Persian people rose up to demonstrate against the hardliners. He could have chosen to side with the people, with freedom and against tyranny. He choose to side with the hardliners and tyranny. Every thing out of the deathbringers mouth is a lie.


7 posted on 08/10/2015 9:35:30 AM PDT by justa-hairyape (The use of the name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If only. The Repubs are more like the vichy french


8 posted on 08/10/2015 9:44:27 AM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Of course he doubles down on this stupid comment

He made it didn’t he? The won is never wrong

He is not only stupid but arrogant and vindictive

It is no great loss to be dissed by a man like buraq Obama

I am curious though

What is it his deal did not give to the Iranian hardliners?
What concessions do they think Iran made in this dipwick deal?

I can’t think of anything


9 posted on 08/10/2015 10:04:00 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

WWAAAAHHHH.....he (Obama) is MEAN....make him APOLOGIZE!!!!!


10 posted on 08/10/2015 10:19:18 AM PDT by goodnesswins (hey..Wussie Americans....ISIS is coming. Are you ready?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
There ya go pubbies. He punched you right in the face. Too bad you don't have a little Trump in ya.

You Congress Kritters are really disgusting wimps. We know your game. Preserve the Party, to Hell with the country.

I am really starting to Hate you Republican Congressional Grifters.

11 posted on 08/10/2015 10:21:12 AM PDT by Awgie (truth is always stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
So Schumer is now a Republican hard liner?

No, he is bowing to his constituency while quietly urging his fellow Libs to stay with Obama's deal.....which is a pack of lies

We have to ask why Barack Hussein Obama would do this to his country!...his country?

(February 25, 2015)

(Not just Bibi...February 24, 2015)

Again....why would Barack Hussein Obama insist on this plan...what do the Mullah's have on Obama?

12 posted on 08/10/2015 10:41:42 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

And I stand by my comparison of Obama to a five year old child on the playground that isn’t getting his way. Although now, I may have to decrease that to a two year old child in day care who isn’t getting his/her way.


13 posted on 08/10/2015 11:10:25 AM PDT by falcon99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Obama is a swine.


14 posted on 08/10/2015 11:15:48 AM PDT by ColdSteelTalon (Light is fading to shadow, and casting its shroud over all we have known...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

If you oppose the President you're disloyal. And an enemy

15 posted on 08/10/2015 11:37:33 AM PDT by SJackson (C Matthews: should NY State recognize gay marriage? Sen Clinton: "No!" The crowd booed, 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson