Posted on 08/08/2015 1:44:52 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Reports have emerged that Donald Trump has given the youre fired treatment to his ally and adviser Roger Stone. However, Stone said that he was the one who called it quits with Trump, saying that his constant feuding is distracting from the core issues.
Trump told The Washington Posts Robert Costa that Stone would dispute how the split happened, and indeed, Stone said he was the one who called it quits. The real estate mogul insisted that the move was a result of Stone not being a serious contributor to his campaign, while also citing the publicity his statements have recently received.
A Trump spokesperson reportedly told MSNBC, we have a tremendously successful campaign and Roger wanted to use the campaign for his own personal publicity.
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...
Trump knows how to delegate. It’s what he does. I can think of all kinds of people he can place in strategic places. Can’t you?
Eh, I've come to believe Trump will mostly implode on his own.
Once upon a time I took the threat that he might run independent seriously, now I don't care. Let him go 3rd party, the sooner the better. He can't control his tantrums, he can't stop from sitting up all night rage tweeting about some journalist he doesn't like, he has no substance behind his "look at me" speeches and interviews. Yes, we know Donald, you have a lot of money and will build great vet hospitals, huge walls (that you make Mexico pay for), win the Hispanic vote, win the black vote, etc, etc. Always grand statements with no specifics - and when pushed to give details he rages like a child playing an MMO and starts tweeting out how "dumb" or "stupid" the person asking the question is.
The more I see him, the less I believe his campaign will amount to anything. I really don't believe he could even make it to a general election.
Please. This is embarrassing. You are not listening. YOU HAVE TO BE BORN ON OUR SOIL !! GET IT?”
Please . It is not that “you are a citizen”. Citizen Snitizen. YOU HAVE TO BE BORN ON US SOIL!! ( or a military base occupied by this country ) or very simply— you are not eligible to be president under Article two of the constitution. I hate it but that is the law. That is what the “birth certificate” was all about on that communist obama!! back then we all said that even though his communist mama was a citizen ( no question) HE WAS BORN IN KENYA ( which he , by God , Was) so “ he couldn’t be president. !! This will go to SCOTUS on Cruz and these faggot loving, baby killers will kill his eligibility. I fricken hate it BUT IT IS THERE!!
“The reason Trump wont talk about core issues is because he cant.”
He’s beating the rest of the crowd 2:1, so maybe if one of your other candidates that you think is talking issues wants to win they should get some advice from Trump.
People don’t vote intellectually. They vote with their wallets.
The owner of that tatoo obviously loves Dick.
That is not what the Constitution says. The “Natural Law” observed by Britain at the time the Constitution was written recognized British subjects born on foreign soil as Natural born citizens. It is believed that this is what the framers relied on in writing the Constitution.
That was further reaffirmed by Congress in a statute in 2008 when this issue was raised about John McCain.
Obama was not a citizen because his one citizen parent had not lived in the United States continuously for the required number of years to legally confer citizenship to him.
How many years must a person live outside the country before their child is declared a non citizen? I can’t find that answer but you KNOW!! How many?
Scotus will decide. I hope you are right. It will be tested.
At the time of Obama’s birth, I believe his mother would have had to live in the U.S. for 18 years. That was lowered to 5 years in 1986.
Actually, that is incorrect. First, you never lose your citizenship — ever. Second, as long as one of your parents is a citizen a baby born abroad is a citizen. Article two is a totally different discussion . It is not about citizenship. Good try though.
Nobody said anything about losing citizenship.
But new questions about the status of BHOs teen age mother Stanley Ann Dunham are surfacing as analysis at another web site is revealing a Congressional rule change for people born between December 23, 1952 and November 13, 1986 puts in serious doubt Stanley Ann Dunhams ability to confer citizenship status on her son.
Since Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. was born in 1961, this newly discovered law involves Dunhams age because she was only 18 at time of delivery! The law says:
When one parent was a U.S. citizen and the other a foreign national, the U.S. citizen parent must have resided in the U.S. for a total of 10 years prior to birth of the child with FIVE of the years after the age of 14. Stanley Ann Dunham did not meet requisite status according to blog discovery. One commenter said, She was not old enough to register Obamas birth in Hawaii or anywhere else in the U.S. as a Natural Born Citizen as she did not meet the residency requirements! Backing this statement up, another commenter reiterates: The law specifically outlines the requirements for a CITIZEN mother to confer citizenship to her baby. Ann Dunham was NOT old enough-case closed!
I’m sorry to be the one to tell because you are in good faith but http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/citizen.asp
The article says this does not apply to Obama because he was born in Hawaii. What is your point?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.