Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Levin Goes Off on Fox, Megyn Kelly over Debate: They Had “Ratings Agenda”
http://threepercenternation.com ^ | August 7, 2015 | Matt Duncan

Posted on 08/08/2015 6:38:33 AM PDT by NKP_Vet

Mark Levin said on his radio show today that he’s not “trashing” Fox News or Megyn Kelly for last night’s GOP debate, merely giving his take as someone “very serious about what’s going on in this country,” but it’s clear he was pretty frustrated, even angry, with how the whole thing turned out.

It drove Levin crazy that at a forum that was supposed to be about issues important to salvaging America’s future, the first hour was a “reality TV show” because of Fox’s “ratings agenda.”

He said there was a fundamental “unseriousness” and “disrespectfulness to candidates who deserved better” from the moderators, especially when it came to the question that really set him off: Kelly confronting Trump about nasty things he’s said about women.

Levin said of her question, “I’m getting tired of these lies and these attacks on Trump. I don’t like bullies.”

He played audio of Rosie O’Donnell mocking Trump and said there was crucial context to Trump’s “cherry-picked” remarks left out of the question.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: kellymegyn; marklevin; megynocology; thedonald; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
Listen to the full audio at link, via The Mark Levin Show:
1 posted on 08/08/2015 6:38:33 AM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Mark nails it as usual.


2 posted on 08/08/2015 6:42:23 AM PDT by Thorliveshere (Minnesota Survivor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Bingo! Any “smart” network should realize that ratings are all that counts (+ $).

Some like MSNBC allow ideology to blur their message and they are losing audience share (- $).

I vote for return(?) to objective, honest journalism, news separation from management as advocated by Sharyl Attkisson, and not worry about bottom line. Viewers will then find you.


3 posted on 08/08/2015 6:44:10 AM PDT by shalom aleichem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thorliveshere

Love that man! He said he hated having to discuss the issue (I doubt he’s voting for Trump!) but he then went on to tear it apart in a way that Rush didn’t do. Rush seemed tired or something yesterday.


4 posted on 08/08/2015 6:45:58 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: I'd like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Mark belongs somewhere in the next administration.


5 posted on 08/08/2015 6:46:40 AM PDT by bramps (Wake me up when we find a candidate to take on the scourge that is Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

6 posted on 08/08/2015 6:47:00 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Ratings were only part of it.

They were doing the bidding of the RNC.

The primary goal was ratings but the secondary goal was to put Trump in his place and to shine the light on a more establishment candidate—Bush or Kasich preferably.

Look who got the most time. Trump (11+ minutes to hopefully hang himself), Bush (8+ minutes to reinvigorate his sagging candidacy). Everyone else got several minutes less than Bush.

It was an embarrassing joke.


7 posted on 08/08/2015 6:51:13 AM PDT by Calpublican (All Hail the Uni-Party!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

I heard most of Mark’s show last night. He did say it’s not about defending Trump and said he wasn’t doing that. He was angry for the country and for the tabloid level discourse we’ve embraced.

Mark was very angry about Cruz being frozen out of the debate.


8 posted on 08/08/2015 6:53:48 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (("This is a Laztatorship. You don't like it, get a day's rations and get out of this office."))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
Megyn left details out of her question which would have been favorable to Trump, so maybe she should apply to MSNBC for a job, because the behavior indicates that.

Trump's blood out of 'whatever' remark was tacky. If he'd have left it at, "Blood coming out of her eyes", 90% of the people would be with him.

I do not think Megyn should moderate future FOX debates because of mocking religion questions directed at Cruz, and Walker. Mimi-Stephanopolous I thought we were avoiding when FOX was doing the first debate. By the next FOX debate Trump may not be involved. Perhaps have Laura Ingraham or Greta Van Sustren replace her...
9 posted on 08/08/2015 6:54:30 AM PDT by BigEdLB (They need to target the 'Ministry of Virtue' which has nothing to do with virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Time to dig up Megyn Kelly (Kendall) divorce records and return the favor.


10 posted on 08/08/2015 6:55:33 AM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

As usual, Levin is spot on.

I was surprised to hear Chris Wallace mention last night that they had received blowback from the debate. You know if he is mentioning it, it is BAD.


11 posted on 08/08/2015 6:56:00 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obama loves America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

I couldn’t resist, I checked what Mygyna was doing on her show (about ten seconds) and what was doing?...holding another Luntz type bench full of morons Q’s and A’s.


12 posted on 08/08/2015 6:56:02 AM PDT by RetSignman (Obama is the walking, talking middle finger in the face of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
Kelly's snarky question clearly crossed the line. It was obvious she had a personal bone to pick with Trump.

But there were a few too many "gotcha" questions to other candidates as well. Scott Walker, who really didn't get much talking time, was assailed because despite an outstanding record during his four years, his prediction of job growth wasn't reached. That question happens to be one of the regular Dem talking points here in Wisconsin. The unemployment rate has dropped, but "YOU DIDN'T CREATE AS MANY JOBS AS YOU SAID YOU WOULD!!!!! WHY NOT????? HUH....HUH????"

I thought Walker did a good job of keeping his cool and just said he'd rather be known for aiming high even if he didn't quite reach his goal.

A better question would have been:

Gov. Walker, are you satisfied with your economic agenda in Wisconsin despite not having reached your target of jobs created?

There were simply too many snarky questions to all candidates. There were some legitimate tough questions, and the candidates have to be prepared for them.

13 posted on 08/08/2015 6:56:19 AM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

Exactly. As I said, I doubt he would support Trump but he knew (as I did!) that this was a lost opportunity when a bimbo suddenly decided the debate was about her and not the future of America. She’s a disgrace. My husband, who is basically apolitical, unfortunately, was shocked at her behavior and never wants to find her again on any channel.


14 posted on 08/08/2015 6:57:12 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: I'd like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

Yep, I’ve never been a Kelly fan, and I never thought for a minute she was a conservative. Her love for gay marriage proved that.

I’m done with Fox for their deliberate avoidance of Cruz. I can get all my news here.


15 posted on 08/08/2015 6:59:18 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (("This is a Laztatorship. You don't like it, get a day's rations and get out of this office."))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: driftless2
This debate was almost a textbook Freudian study in emasculation. A dominatrix in spike heels with 10 little boys arrayed before her - including the one who most disobeyed her orders. It's a wonder she didn't have a whip and a paddle in her hands. This is why I continue to advocate to revoke the vote for women and to get them out of politics until they learn to grow up.
16 posted on 08/08/2015 7:00:45 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: I'd like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

Absolutely. I’d be lost with FR.


17 posted on 08/08/2015 7:01:11 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: I'd like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

I want Cruz, but how she treated him and others was a disgrace and she should be embarrassed by her attitude.


18 posted on 08/08/2015 7:02:29 AM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
I totally agree with Levin.

They way this so called debate was handled was a great disservice to the voters.

Kelly is not the only one to blame. All three moderstors behaved in a cheesy way.

These candidates had one minute to react and explain the attacks on them. Not enough time to provide context.

Next person up for FOX to annihilate is Ted Cruz. That started this morning. They have a big push on for Rubio, so they used a clip of Ted Cruz talking about how most on that stage were pushing amnesty. Cheap shot because Cruz was not also on to point out to Rubio that he was exactly FOR amnesty. No mention of the gang of 8 or his collusion with Chuck Schumer. Rubio sat and lied to Rush Limbaugh on his show about that Immigration bill not being amnesty. He also lied this morning. This tells me Rubio is not mature enough to be President. His ambition outweighs his proclaimed principles. Folks, FOX is not election headquarters. It has never been good at election coverage. They are merely a tool for the ruling class. FOX is circling the wagons to justify some pretty cheap behavior on the part of it's anchors. Those anchors are every bit as full of themselves as they accuse Trump of.

19 posted on 08/08/2015 7:03:15 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldbill

You don’t think the Trump team is doing that right now? They are no altar boys. Most of his advisers sound like Tony Soprano.


20 posted on 08/08/2015 7:04:52 AM PDT by nhwingut (This tagline for lease)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson