Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amy Schumer’s Gun-Control Push Could Backfire
New York Magazine ^ | August 4, 2015 | Jesse Singal

Posted on 08/04/2015 2:47:43 PM PDT by nickcarraway

It's understandable why people are celebrating the fact that Amy Schumer has, alongside her cousin, New York senator Chuck Schumer, signed onto an effort to enact expanded gun-control laws. Amy Schumer, after all, is a star reaching the peak of her fame, and many progressives have been frustrated at the complete lack of progress on this issue, with many states loosening gun-control laws in the wake of mass shootings rather than tightening them. It seems like a clear victory to have a pop-culture star on the side of vocal gun-control efforts. But there's also a very real chance it could cause a backlash that hurts gun-control efforts.

People who study political psychology and persuasion believe that there are important differences between issues that have become politicized, and therefore tied to individuals' deeply-held values and identity, like global warming, and those which have not, like vaccination. As I wrote back in February in the context of the vaccination fight, "Reams of social-science research have shown that when people feel their identity is under attack, their hearts harden, in a sense — they cling tighter to their group’s beliefs." When people not only hold an opinion, but believe that it's the sort of opinion people like them are supposed to hold, the persuasion process gets a lot trickier and more fraught.

Gun control is extremely politicized — in some polls asking whether gun laws should be made stricter, there's a 40-point gap between Democrats and Republicans. It's also become a potent stand-in for all sorts of other political and cultural agreements. Many people, in other words, don't look at this as a simple policy question, weighing the evidence on a case-by-case basis depending on the proposal being discussed. Rather, they see opposition to (or advocacy for) gun control as an important marker of cultural and political identity.

That's where the question of Amy Schumer's effectiveness comes in. Since she's easily identified as a "Hollywood liberal" — a hated category among many conservatives — it's not a stretch to think that the sort of people who will need to be convinced in order for stronger gun control to take hold will, if anything, further dig into their anti-gun-control positions when presented with a messenger like Schumer. (That's not a knock on her personally, of course; she's taking time out of her schedule to advocate on an important issue.) It should surprise no one how this is being framed in some media outlets; "Progressive Politicians and Hollywood Unite to Spread Anti-Gun Propaganda," screechedThe Blaze, for example.

"If the goal is persuasion, I’d definitely worry about the possibility of backlash," said Brendan Nyhan, a political scientist at Dartmouth who specializes in persuasion research, in an email. "This study, for instance, found that 'when people who dislike Jennifer Aniston are exposed to information about her support for Democrats, they report liking the Democratic Party less' (though the importance of celebrity endorsements is often exaggerated)."

But the first half of his statement is important — if the goal is persuasion. "It’s also possible that the goal is to mobilize the kind of people who like Amy and Chuck Schumer," he said. In that case, an effort like this could be useful. The problem, though, is that the roadblock to more comprehensive gun control doesn't seem to be a lack of interest among advocates — there are some pretty big organizations and constituencies that have been calling for better gun control forever. The obstacle has always been the powerful National Rifle Association and anti-gun-control members of Congress — folks who probably won't be taking cues from Amy Schumer anytime soon.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: banglist; guncontrol
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Repeal The 17th

Even when I see her picture, I don’t know who she is.


21 posted on 08/04/2015 3:08:27 PM PDT by NathanR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NathanR
Even when I see her picture, I don’t know who she is.

Consider that a blessing.

22 posted on 08/04/2015 3:11:07 PM PDT by BipolarBob (Hillary is as believable as Sharknado 3. Oh Hell No!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
* Amy Schumer’s Gun-Control Push Could Backfire *

Let's hope so!!!

Many Innocent people will die because of her irresponsible emotion-based nonsense.

Who will someone call if a bad guy with a gun comes to shoot up a school?

a) A psychologist who will talk the shooter into giving up his gun and suddenly becoming a nice guy (ala Nancy Pelosi’s insane theory).

b) An expert in feng shui who will quickly rearrange the furniture causing “bad chi” to point at the shooter resulting in the shooter dropping his gun?

c) Al Sharpton

d) A good guy with a gun.

23 posted on 08/04/2015 3:12:52 PM PDT by PATRIOT1876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Yeah, I never heard of her until yesterday.


24 posted on 08/04/2015 3:18:53 PM PDT by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Amy should shut up about guns and go back to talking about her V** and how many guys she screws.


25 posted on 08/04/2015 3:20:10 PM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (Things are only going to get worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomStar3028

I don’t know... there was this one in school...


26 posted on 08/04/2015 3:20:36 PM PDT by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: skimbell
Yeah, I never heard of her until yesterday.

That's too bad, 'cause "she's reaching the peak of her fame" according to this article.

27 posted on 08/04/2015 3:22:08 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

She’s a nobody, a minor comedian who has a movie and appears on cable TV sometimes. Who is going to be influenced by what she says about anything?


28 posted on 08/04/2015 3:23:12 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NathanR
I don't know. Something about her looks familiar.
29 posted on 08/04/2015 3:25:10 PM PDT by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2
She is clever and funny.

No, she's not.

She's operating on about the same cerebral level as that idiot Megan McCain...thinking she has something to say and everyone will and must listen just because of who she is related to and the name recognition.

If she has one iota of her uncle Chuckyou Schmucker in her, she is a real damned fool and as worthless as the turd in the White House.

30 posted on 08/04/2015 3:25:37 PM PDT by OldSmaj (obama is a worthless mohametan. Impeach his ass now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: skimbell

This was supposed to be in response to #18.


31 posted on 08/04/2015 3:27:03 PM PDT by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

WHO?


32 posted on 08/04/2015 3:28:52 PM PDT by longfellow (Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

No comments at the site. Surprise, surprise.

This is not written as an opinion, but as a “science” article.


33 posted on 08/04/2015 3:39:05 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Amy Schumer is apparently unaware of the fact that the Streisand Effect can manifest in unpredictable ways, and in a range of social issues. Note the rocket propelled rise of The Donald, fueled by media/celeb/GOPe attacks.

More “gun control”=higher gun sales

More guns=less crime


34 posted on 08/04/2015 3:59:02 PM PDT by Company Man ("An armed society is a polite society." -- Robert Heinlein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Nobody listens to fat chicks.


35 posted on 08/04/2015 4:14:37 PM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Company Man

So you support what she is doing?


36 posted on 08/04/2015 4:16:30 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Oh, hellno.


37 posted on 08/04/2015 4:32:42 PM PDT by Company Man ("An armed society is a polite society." -- Robert Heinlein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Amy Schumer may be creating her own “Dixie Chicks” moment.


38 posted on 08/04/2015 5:15:02 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

...tried to watch her MTV comedy sketch show.

Pretty foul—scatological, perverted sexual humor and misogynistic....over and over again....not just a joke or two—it was CONSTANT.

I did not think it worthy of a young lady with a theatrical education.

But it sold to the MTV kids....and so she gets to make movies and I bet her cousin Chuck Schumer was a bit of a help, too....


39 posted on 08/04/2015 5:28:17 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Who?


40 posted on 08/05/2015 5:23:08 AM PDT by Amagi (Lenin: "Socialized Medicine is the Keystone to the Arch of the Socialist State.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson