Posted on 07/24/2015 9:57:41 AM PDT by Dave346
Secretary of State John Kerry sat down with Matt Lauer for an interview on Today earlier, defending the deal with Iran and telling Israel to cool their jets, almost literally. In doing so, Kerry managed to turn Israel into the aggressor and Iran into a passive actor who might somehow decide they need a bomb only if Israel attacked them. Its a strange reversal, and one that confirms the impression that the Obama administration has become the lawyers for the mullahs (via Jeff Dunetz):
Lauer points out to Kerry that opposition to the Iran deal encompasses practically the whole Israeli political spectrum. Kerry responds by noting that a few Israelis support it the former head of Shin Bet the former head of Mossad. Kerry opts to ignore the fact that representatives of both major alliances in Israeli politics, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his erstwhile opponent in the last election Isaac Herzog, both strenuously rejected Kerrys deal. Herzog, whom the Obama administration and Kerry in particular hoped would be a more pliable partner in US-Israeli relations, said that Kerry and Obama would unleash a lion from its cage with the deal, and that it would affect our borders. and it will affect the safety of my children.
When Lauer hinted that the deal puts us at odds with Israel if they chose to take action, Kerry responded that any such action would provide justification for Irans pursuit of nuclear weapons:
Lauer: Do you think because many in Israel including the prime minister are very uncomfortable with the deal that the its now making it more likely than two years ago, for example, that Israel might attempt some unilateral action military or cyber attack against Iran?
Kerry: Well I think that would be an enormous mistake. A huge mistake with grave consequences for Israel and the region, and I dont think its necessary. The fact is we will have for 15 years a restraint on Iran that absolutely prevents it from developing a weapon. They cant enrich beyond 3.67%. You cant make a bomb at 3.67% they will have only 300 kilograms in a stockpile of enriched uranium. You cant make a bomb with that. They would have inspections on a daily basis the in their facilities.
That assumes, of course, that the Iranians will never cheat on the agreement. That seems like a fair assumption, except if you take into consideration all of the times theyve cheated on other agreements over the last 20+ years on the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. But other than that
Lauer: If the Israelis are not convinced and they take action where would it leave us the? Would we support Israel? Would the treaty go up in smoke?
Kerry: If they bombed them, sure Matt. I presume Iran would have a reason to say this is why we need a bomb. And what Iran will decide to do is dig deeper because Israel doesnt have the ability to stop, nor do we, unless we went to all out war and literally annihilated Iran which I dont are hear people talking about. So if you proceed with a normal military operation, you are talking about rolling back the program for two to three years. Then what do you do? And if you did that what will Irans response be? They are likely to decide now you have proven why we need a bomb and they will dig deeper and go get it.
Er, what? Kerry seems to forget that its not Israel who has spent the last three decades-plus issuing threats to wipe Iran off the map. Irans mullahs and their handpicked politicians have repeatedly, even joyously, pledged to destroy Israel ever since the 1979 revolution put them in power. Thats been the purpose of their pursuit of nuclear weapons, along with imposing their own regional hegemony through nuclear terrorism on top of all the other forms of terrorism they have been employing since seizing power. In fact, Supreme Leader Ali Khameini codified the regimes public posture on the elimination of Israel in November of last year, in what the Iranians must have thought would be taken as a sign of moderation.
Not surprisingly, the Israelis object to this idea, and theyre pretty sure that the nukes Iran has tried to build for two decades had Tel Aviv as their targets. They dont want to wait until the missiles are in the air to ensure their survival. Their attempts to stop or slow down this nuclear pursuit arent why Iran thinks it needs the bomb, and to make that kind of statement is either willful obtuseness or astounding naïveté. Either way, it hardly makes trust us a great option for Israel especially since Kerry and Obama refused to demand guarantees for Israel as part of the deal.
Kerrys not going to be all alone in selling this crap-sandwich deal to the American public and Congress. Dave Weigel reports in the Washington Post that MoveOn will come out of mothballs to conduct protests at August town-hall meetings in favor of the deal, taking a page from 2009 Tea Party protests against ObamaCare. That comparison probably wont last for long, though:
But MoveOns most ambitious goal is to turn the long August recess of 2015 into the summer of peace. The inspiration comes just a little from the other side. In 2009, the last Democratic Congress was almost brought to heel at town halls, a combination of grassroots activism and top-level strategizing by groups like Americans for Prosperity. Tea Party activists packed the once-sleepy meetings of their local representatives. Some viral videos made some voters into celebrities; others made congressmen into former congressmen. (The 60-day countdown for congressional action on the deal takes the recess into consideration; had the deal been finished earlier, the countdown would have lasted 30 days.)
There are two new, stiff challenges for any effort like this. One: In 2009, members of Congress discovered that they did not like being yelled at and seeing the videos show up on TV. Since then, tele-townhalls and smaller, invite-only forums have become more popular, and traditional town halls have started to decrease. According to Legistorm, the 535 voting members of Congress held a total of 588 public meetings in the 2014 recess down from an already paltry 792 the previous summer.
Problem two: MoveOn will have company. Galland framed its campaign as an answer an ongoing, expensive campaign by opponents of the deal. The American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC, is supplementing one ad campaign that could cost as much as $20 million. But the bulk of AIPACs effort is one-on-one lobbying, especially among safe Democratic members of Congress who balk at casting votes against Israel. Last week, at its annual Washington conference, Christians United for Israel announced the creation of a political fund to move Congress against the deal.
Good luck with that. The more that Kerry talks about this deal, the worse it sounds. They might do better to form a barrier outside of State to keep Kerry quiet.
Update: I changed justify to provide justification for in both the headline and the post, which is more accurately what Kerry asserted.
Wow.
Every time I think I can’t possibly despise this douche more, he steps up his BS.
FUJK!
“Our” leaders should be tried for crimes against humanity.. much less sensibility.
This is ridiculous.
The hounds guarding the fox as he raids the chicken coop.
I’m picturing two cops cornering a perp.
One yells: “Freeze!”
The other yells: “Get on the ground!”
Any action will guarantee a shooting.
"Well, which is it, young feller? You want I should freeze or get down on the ground? Mean to say, if'n I freeze, I can't rightly drop. And if'n I drop, I'm a-gonna be in motion. You see... "
Hey Congress...did you hear that??? Now, what are you going to do about these anti-Israel, anti-American thug criminals??
This excrement has to go into the “VETO PROOF” trash can.
I'm still trying to figure out what the hell is going on since Iran signed the Nuclear non-proliferation TREATY. (NPT)
Wouldn’t it be great if Obama and Kerry are bought up in some future judicial forum for trials as war criminals? In the mean time, Israel has to begin treating the US as an enemy nation in alliance with Iran to try and destroy Israel.
That is a bald-faced lie.
Why would anyone trust a known cheater like Iran to honor any agreement? Kerry is dangerously naïve.
Like the Las Vegas cops at Costco.
And the USA and Israel hope to survive 18 months more of this administration and McConnell?
Something has got to give.
It’s not unreasonable to conclude that the whole Iran deal was fueled by obama’s rabid hatred of Israel, with kerry in the same corner, drooling just as much over the prospect of annihilating the only democracy in the Middle East.
This guy is truly an idiot. Government is the only place where the least competent among us can reach the highest heights. Man, I wish I had good hair.
Another anti-Semite weighs in (just like his boss-man!)
I guess Kerry isn’t finished covering himself with s*&^!
He has to come out with a dumba#@ statement like THAT!
Gee, I wonder if he gets counselled by Jane Fonda for talking points like these?
In case there is one iota of doubt left what the real plan is should be gone with Lurch’s comments.
For those who are still not right with the Lord, you might want to consider taking care of that now.
Tomorrow is guaranteed to no one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.