Posted on 07/22/2015 2:25:26 AM PDT by GoneSalt
I'm feeling a bit Onion-y today and consequently I must offer a explanationa theoryabout what we are seeing these days in this hallucinogenic political season.
Now that Donald Trump has taken the lead in the latest Fox poll, its time to call this perverse reality show for what it really is.
Trump is working for his friend Hillary Clintons landslide election.
(Excerpt) Read more at radio.foxnews.com ...
They’ve tried everything else. Now they’re saying he’s working for Hillary. That’s funny. He might help her but I don’t think he’s working for anybody.
You might be right...
I would just hope he could knock out Bush.
Well, that would make Trump a “VP” ... is that good?
>> I would just hope he could knock out Bush <<
Hillary’s dream!
Washington Post-ABC News poll, July 16-19, 2015
http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/page/politics/washington-post-abc-news-poll-july-16-19-2015/1778/
Q: If Donald Trump wins the Republican nomination for
president would you definitely vote for him in the general election for president in 2016, would you consider voting for him or would you definitely not vote for him?
Definitely would vote for
14
Would consider voting for
20
Definitely would NOT vote for
62
No opinion
4
====================================== Donald Trump on Gun Control
http://www.ontheissues.org/donald_trump.htm#Gun_Control
"For assault weapon ban, waiting period, & background check. (Jul 2000)"
And another one to watch out for.
Ben Carson on Gun Control
http://www.ontheissues.org/Ben_Carson.htm#Gun_Control
"Semi-automatic weapons ok in countryside, but not cities. (Mar 2013)"
Washington Post-ABC News poll, July 16-19, 2015
http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/page/politics/washington-post-abc-news-poll-july-16-19-2015/1778/
Q: If Donald Trump wins the Republican nomination for
president would you definitely vote for him in the general election for president in 2016, would you consider voting for him or would you definitely not vote for him?
Definitely would vote for
14
Would consider voting for
20
Definitely would NOT vote for
62
No opinion
4
======================================
Donald Trump on Gun Control
http://www.ontheissues.org/donald_trump.htm#Gun_Control
"For assault weapon ban, waiting period, & background check. (Jul 2000)"
And another one to watch out for.
Ben Carson on Gun Control
http://www.ontheissues.org/Ben_Carson.htm#Gun_Control
"Semi-automatic weapons ok in countryside, but not cities. (Mar 2013)"
Bingo! I like it!
(And much better than a "PV" or Provocative Vulgarianist-- if I may say so.)
I guess we’ll start seeing all kinds of inventions like this out of desperation to bring Trump down. Yes, it is all for Hitlery. I guess Trump didn’t mean it then when he called her “The worst secretary of state in US history. Under her the world blew up”.
They said the same stuff about Reagan that they are saying today about Trump. Someone posted some of these quotes this morning from when Reagan was first running........
New York Times: Reagans candidacy is patently ridiculous..
New York Times: The astonishing thing is that this amusing but frivolous Reagan fantasy is taken so seriously by the news media and particularly by the President (Gerald Ford). It makes a lot of news, but it makes no sense..
New Republic: Ronald Reagan to me is still the posturing, essentially mindless and totally unconvincing candy man that hes been in my opinion ever since I watched his first try for the Republican nomination evaporate in Miami in 1968..
New Republic: Reagan is Goldwater revisited He is a divisive factor in the party..
Harpers magazine: That he should be regarded as a serious candidate for President is a shame and an embarrassment for the country at large to swallow..
The look on that cat's face makes me LOL every time!
"OMG NOT THIS %^$^ AGAIN"
:’) We put our pets through a lot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.