Skip to comments.
Scott Walker, Set for a Bigger Stage, Faces G.O.P Revolt in Wisconsin
New York Times ^
| 6/24/2015
| Trip Gabriel
Posted on 06/30/2015 3:54:44 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
As Gov. Scott Walker prepares to announce his campaign for president next month, promising to bring what he calls "big bold leadership" to Washington, as he did in Wisconsin, he faces a cloud over that story line: Republicans back home are in revolt.
Leaders or Mr. walker's party, which controls the Legislature, are balking at his demands for the state's budget. Critics say the governor's spending blueprint is aimed more at appealing to conservatives in early-voting states like Iowa than doing what is best for Wisconsin.
Lawmakers are stymied over how to pay for road and bridge repairs without raising taxes or fees, which Walker has ruled out. The governor's fellow Republicans rejected his proposal to borrow $1.3 billion for the roadwork, arguing that adding to the state's debt is irresponsible.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 2016election; amnesty; demagogicparty; election2016; heflippedonillegals; memebuilding; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorkslimes; newyorktimes; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; paultardation; paultardnoisemachine; proamnesty; proobamacare; protpp; randpaulnoisemachine; randsconcerntrolls; rino; scottwalker; tripgabriel; walker; walkerisprotpp; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
What it boils down to is basically this: The Republican legislature doesn't like borrow-and spend and they don't ax-and-spend, either. Secondly, many in the GOP there view this as an "unfunded mandate." Third, the under-current on this with the GOP there is that there are private investors who want to build a stadium and in with this will go tax-payer dollars. This doesn't seem to be true free-market capitalism, where the investors put up all of the risk, but they also get all of the reward. Sure, some might say that in some ways many other businesses not directly linked will also benefit economically. But if this stadium ends up being a net loss for the area, and if the big-time investors end up not bearing the brunt of the fallout, then perhaps that might be an example of corporatism, where the big-time investors reap the majority of the rewards if things go well, but if things don't go as planned then the average-Joe taxpayer might be the ones who bear the majority of the losses.
To: Laissez-faire capitalist; onyx; Hunton Peck; Diana in Wisconsin; P from Sheb; Shady; ...
NY Times executes “hit” on Walker.
FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this wisconsin interest ping list.
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Yea, Scott Walker! Fire ‘em all!
3
posted on
06/30/2015 3:58:24 PM PDT
by
familyop
("Baxters over there, Rojos there, and me right in the middle" ("A Fistful of Dollars").)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist; All
Please, no Ad Homs (personal attacks) directed at any posters here on this thread. We can all walk and chew bubble gum: eventually go after Hillary (as she herself right now is dragging her own poll numbers down) while working to find the best in the GOP primaries.
I know, I know, it seems as if those who support Ted Cruz or Ben Carson or others can’t say anything about Walker because if they do they are the bad guy, but Walker supporters get free rein here at FR to go after Cruz and others...
To: afraidfortherepublic
And the NY Times executes “hits” on Cruz, Carson and everyone else, too. So what else is new?
To: afraidfortherepublic
BTW, is the GOP legislature executing a “hit” on their own guy (Walker)?
Just wondering...
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
They all like borrow-and-spend.
Heavy Hitters: Top All-Time Donors, 1989-2014http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.phpAmerican Fedn of State, County & Municipal Employees $60,949,129 [Democrat] 81% [Republican] 1%
Leviathan (Uncle Sam employs more people than you think) National Review ^ | 02/03/2011 | Iain Murray
"
...nearly 40 million Americans employed in some way by government."
Three-quarters of Americans think teachers paid less than they really are Washington Examiner ^ | 9-16-13 | ASHE SCHOW
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3067473/posts
Firefighters, Teachers and Police - Not a Federal Responsibilityhttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2896477/posts
$85,000 salaries: Teaching pays offhttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1008237/posts
Joy of six (figures): 738 NYC teachers getting $100G+ pensionshttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2456298/posts
LAUSD: Teachers have little reason to cry poorhttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2095889/posts
Obama signs emergency bill to halt teacher layoffs yahoo ^
Posted on Tue Aug 10 17:38:51 2010
"
The aid for the states is to be paid for mostly by closing a tax loophole used by multinational corporations and by reducing food stamp benefits for the poor...The legislation provides $10 billion to school districts to rehire laid-off teachers or to ensure that more teachers won't be let go before the new school year begins."
Mutually Assured Destruction [Tues. debacle confirms growing rift between Dems & teachers unions.] American Spectator ^ | 11/5/10 | RiShawn Biddle
"
Congressional Democrats angered centrist school reformers, MoveOn.org-style progressives, and other party activists in August when they voted to ladle $10 billion in federal subsidies (funded from future cuts to the Food Stamp program) to school districts in order to stave off layoffs of 160,000 teachers (or just 2.6 percent of the nation's 6.2 million school employees). In turn, the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers poured more than $40 million of their hefty campaign war chests (including more than $15 million by the NEA in the last weeks of the election season alone) to help the Democrats keep full control of Congress."
House bill would cut $4B a year from food stamps Associated Press ^ | Sep 16, 2013 6:28 PM EDT | Mary Clare Jalonick
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3067558/posts
Should the Government Help Homeowners With Underwater Mortgages?http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2843181/posts
Cushy government pay, benefits nationwide (UNION EXTORTION)http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1544705/posts
Life's tough for $144,000 garbage collectorshttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2662108/posts
Government Workers Make 45 Percent More Than Private Sector Employeeshttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2447819/posts
More than 13% of DWP workers are paid $100,000 and uphttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1905448/posts
77,000 feds paid more than governorsGovernment salaries put under scrutinyhttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2728143/posts
7
posted on
06/30/2015 4:00:41 PM PDT
by
familyop
("Baxters over there, Rojos there, and me right in the middle" ("A Fistful of Dollars").)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
One wonders. It seems that they don’t know how to play when the boss is away.
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
And the NY Times executes hits on Cruz, Carson and everyone else Exactly my point.
To: familyop
So if the federal government borrows money (which both Republicans and Dems in DC do) then that is better than tax-and-spend? How about doing neither of the two?
Secondly, there are corporatists on both sides of the aisle (both Dems and Republicans) with some who like taxpayer- funded subsidies for oil and gas but not for “green” stuff, and others who want subsidies for green stuff, but not for oil and gas.
Neither side of this truly supports free market/free enterprise in this regard.
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Dubious. Wisconsin has excellent roads. On the whole, their roads are probably the best in the country. I doubt there has ever been a problem getting road maintenance funding in that state.
11
posted on
06/30/2015 4:05:05 PM PDT
by
SeeSharp
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
WEll the guy still has not announced. Cruz and Trump are eclipsing him. I think he’s peaking and he will be the GOPe default candidate after Jebbie crashed and burns which will kill him on FR.
12
posted on
06/30/2015 4:05:32 PM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: afraidfortherepublic
But the problem is, there have been times here at FR when people have posted stuff from The NY Times and they crow about how it hurts Hillary or some other Democrat.
So, we have people here at FR vacillating back and forth about how the NY Times is good, no they are bad, no they are good, no they are bad and on and on it goes.
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
14
posted on
06/30/2015 4:07:37 PM PDT
by
familyop
("Baxters over there, Rojos there, and me right in the middle" ("A Fistful of Dollars").)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
Id rathr have money go for the road repair than a new stadium. We have a lot of old stadiums in downtown already.
15
posted on
06/30/2015 4:08:02 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: familyop
My understanding is that the big disagreements holding up the Wisconsin budget are huge cuts to education that Walker wants and the legislature does not. Walker wants to borrow a huge sum of money for road and bridge repair and the legislature also disagrees with that.
Meanwhile, Wisconsin lost more jobs in May than any other state, over 8,000 jobs lost. Wisconsin has lagged behind since 2011 at about half the national average for job growth. Their unemployment rate is almost a point below the national average, but not enough to account for that low percentage of job production.
16
posted on
06/30/2015 4:09:49 PM PDT
by
conservativejoy
(We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
17
posted on
06/30/2015 4:11:56 PM PDT
by
familyop
("Baxters over there, Rojos there, and me right in the middle" ("A Fistful of Dollars").)
To: conservativejoy
Mix in with that opposition from the GOP over what many of them view as this being an “unfunded mandate,” more borrow-and-spend, and the issue of taxpayer dollars paying for a big chunk of the proposed stadium.
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
The NYT was more balanced when Abe Rosenthal was editor. But, they fired him; and then he died. It's been a mess ever since. Always a shock if they publish an article, or express an opinion, that is not hard left.
Rosenthal was banished from the NYT in the late 90's, or before. First he became editor emeritus, and then became the editor for Jewish/Christian news. Although he was Jewish, himself, he had a magnanimous attitude toward Middle Eastern Christians. I always enjoyed his columns.
It was that Punch somebody who kicked him out.
To: familyop
The only one? Yeah, sure....
I don’t agree with Rand Paul on hardly anything, but he would certainly eclipse Walker in that area, and it would be very hard to say that Walker would cut big government spending more than Cruz would.
BTW, big gov’t isn’t being involved with the stadium issue in Wisconsin?
Is it only the investors who are going to be putting money up for the proposed stadium?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson