Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saudi Arabia to buy nuclear bombs from Pakistan: report
New York Post ^ | may 17/2015 | bill sanderson

Posted on 05/17/2015 5:52:18 PM PDT by rdl6989

Saudi Arabia will join the nuclear club by buying “off the shelf” atomic weapons from Pakistan, US officials told a London newspaper.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Russia; US: New York; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; armsrace; bho44; bhomiddleeast; billsanderson; hasobamasnameonit; india; iran; kurdistan; muslimworld; newyork; newyorkpost; nuclear; nuclearbomb; nuclearbombs; nukes; obamasfault; obamasnameonit; pakistan; proliferation; russia; saudiarabia; unitedkingdom; waronterror; worldwar3
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: Theoria

The problem really comes when the House of Saud is overthrown, then what?


41 posted on 05/17/2015 6:13:15 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Yet another mistake of the idiot Bush: trusting the evil Musharraf and accepting his independence after 9/11 — instead of using the U.S. military to de-nuke Pakistan and smash their links to Al Queda. NO Islamic nation can be trusted with a nuke.


42 posted on 05/17/2015 6:14:19 PM PDT by montag813 (Pray for Israel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989
This is awful! I sure hope Our President© hurries up and destroys all of ours so we'll be setting a good example and the Saudis and the Iranians and the Russians and the Chinese and the North Koreans and the Pakistanis and the Brits and the French will throw all of theirs into the ocean.

Why yes, I am applying for a State Department job. Why do you ask?

43 posted on 05/17/2015 6:14:21 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Another result of the disastrous Obama/Clinton foreign policies.


44 posted on 05/17/2015 6:16:09 PM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

Actually, per my specops friends, the Sadui military is pretty good. Ranking: (1) Israel (duh), (2) Egypt, (3) Saudi Arabia. They don’t suck.

/ref ME only. Worldwide, Israela and US (despite 0’s efforts) are WAY ahead of everyone else.


45 posted on 05/17/2015 6:16:20 PM PDT by piytar (We are well on the way to building a freaking Warp Drive. Do you really want to tick us off?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

doubt it. he’s not that competent.


46 posted on 05/17/2015 6:18:25 PM PDT by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Turkey is under the NATO nuclear umbrella. If someone nukes Turkey, NATO is obligated to retaliate.


47 posted on 05/17/2015 6:19:46 PM PDT by matt1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

48 posted on 05/17/2015 6:20:18 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mosaicwolf

It seemed like an unusually large number to me.


The Bible was written by Middle-Easterners for MEers, so a third of the ME destroyed would be enough to check them for another century... at best, what with their emigration progress recently.

The key is to insure Israel escapes the devastation.


49 posted on 05/17/2015 6:20:23 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Good question. I don't have the answers. We still are not sure what has happened to the loose nukes post USSR fall.

But, we have also tolerated Pakistan having them since the early 90's. Then again, India gets to worry about that more than US.

50 posted on 05/17/2015 6:20:27 PM PDT by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

Yep, damn Turks are going to pull us into WWIII, whose wonderful idea was it let them in NATO?


51 posted on 05/17/2015 6:20:56 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Appeasement, liberalism....ain’t it dandy?


52 posted on 05/17/2015 6:25:03 PM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piytar

They reportedly gave the pilots who flew bombing missions in Yemen Bentleys. I’m thinking it was because they had a hard time getting them to fly.

They may be good, but are they motivated? The original king convinced the tribes to fight together under him. Would anybody follow the current, reportedly feeble king if he declared war? Would the military or the Saudi people undergo the kinds of depravations that war brings without revolting? The royal family is not popular and they maintain power by paying off the people. Interrupt the flow of oil and that ends real fast.


53 posted on 05/17/2015 6:26:31 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

Good work Obama. We can watch a whole new set of dominoes fall because of this.

The nuclear powers did their best to prevent proliferation in the old days. Now Russia and Obama cast that aside in their brave new world. (Russia helping Iran)


54 posted on 05/17/2015 6:28:09 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Conservatism: Now home to liars too. And we'll support them. Yea... GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aposiopetic
If somebody favored Iran, it would be in their interest to “leak” this, whether or not true, to justify the Iranian nuclear program.

Or maybe someone's floating this to try and discourage us from letting Iran get nukes.

55 posted on 05/17/2015 6:32:27 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

LOL!
Just three days ago the WashPost told it’s idiots “A nuclear Iran will not lead to a nuclear Middle East, no matter what the Gulf states say”:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/05/14/a-nuclear-iran-will-not-lead-to-a-nuclear-middle-east-no-matter-what-the-gulf-states-say/


56 posted on 05/17/2015 6:33:14 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle
Or maybe someone's floating this to try and discourage us from letting Iran get nukes.

Could be.

57 posted on 05/17/2015 6:36:20 PM PDT by aposiopetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

Surely you realize he had this planned from the start.


58 posted on 05/17/2015 6:38:12 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

I don’t believe he’s that smart.


59 posted on 05/17/2015 6:39:54 PM PDT by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

“President Pretentious Ignoramus has set off a nuclear arms race in the most unstable region of the world.”

I hope the children of Obama Voters live long enough to curse their names for voting for this idiot.


60 posted on 05/17/2015 6:41:23 PM PDT by tcrlaf (They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson