Posted on 05/07/2015 6:34:51 AM PDT by elhombrelibre
On the campaign trail, Hillary Clinton has been pushing hard to overhaul of the country's broken campaign finance system. "We need to fix our dysfunctional political system and get unaccounted money out of it, once and for all, even if that takes a constitutional amendment," Clinton said during one of her first official speeches in Iowa last month.
Clinton's campaign finance rhetoric appears to be aimed at super-PACs, the quasi-independent organizations that bolster campaigns by buying ads. But when it comes to the major funders behind her own presidential campaign, the Democratic front-runner has yet to answer questions about how transparent she's willing to be. When Mother Jones questioned the Clinton camp about whether it will disclose the names and fundraising totals of the key supportersknown as "bundlers"who raise vast sums of cash, a spokesperson declined to provide an answer, saying only that the campaign was still figuring out its plans.
(Excerpt) Read more at motherjones.com ...
I’ll bet it’s donors to their “Clinton Foundation” money machine.
I think there are very candidates that MoJo would endorse, Most are ultra-left wackos.
“Could it be....Satan?”
She’ll disclose what she and her handlers want disclosed...and only that much...just as soon as all the fake paper trails are in place. Be patient, a good cover-up takes time.
Actually, I’ve enjoyed pointing out to people elsewhere that when it came to fraud and identify and intimidating opponents and threats, Nixon was basically a choir boy compared to FDR and LBJ and the Kennedy brothers. I can reasonably assume FDR did not give Hoover orders to spy on Charles Lindbergh, amongst others, just because Hoover had a thing for wearing women’s things under his 3 piece suits.
Guaranteed to piss off liberals on discussion boards when you mention such things.
The woman has no shame.
The woman has no shame.
The Left is doing their level best to strangle the Hillary candidacy in its crib. They want the Fake Indian.
Thanks for the interesting article and forgive my repeating of myth #1 in my initial post, lol. I took a look at Wikipedia’s write up on Hoover and it mentioned that Richard Nixon was quoted in 1971 saying he did not want to fire Hoover over fear of possible reprisals from Hoover.
Still eye opening to see how Hoover was put to very good use by Democrat presidents over the years, though.
Bump
Let’s face it. Even the Left fears revelations about the Clintons that could scuttle the Hillary Clinton campaign in no time flat. Especially Hillary, who the Left have a lot of mixed feelings about.
Americas Enemies?
Even the left sees Ted Cruz in 2016.
Did you see this? She might not want people knowing who she hires either...
“...at least four Clinton Foundation board of directors have either been charged or convicted of financial crimes, including bribery and fraud.”
Did you see this? Hillary might not want people knowing who she hires either...
“...at least four Clinton Foundation board of directors have either been charged or convicted of financial crimes, including bribery and fraud.”
No, sounds like breaking news. Post it for all on FReeREpublic to see. That’s big.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.