Posted on 04/23/2015 7:08:29 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Five years ago this week, a blowout of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil rig 40 miles from the Gulf Coast tragically claimed eleven lives and spilled 3 million barrels of oil from the damaged wellhead into the Gulf. It’s hard to forget the video images of thick oil gushing, day after day, into the region’s waters.
It was a horrific accident that caused substantial damage to the ecology and commerce of the region. Gulf-area wildlife, portions of the shoreline, tourism, fishers and shrimpers, and energy-sector workers suffered large losses in the aftermath of the spill.
BP has paid close to $27 billion in penalties, payments to aggrieved parties, and clean-up costs, in one of the largest payouts for an accident in American history. This is enough money to hand every man, woman, boy, and girl in Chicago or Houston a $10,000 check. In addition, as the result of a court ruling last fall finding that BP was guilty of willful misconduct and gross negligence leading up to the spill, BP might have to pay another $13.7 billion in Clean Water Act penalties.
But the good news on this fifth anniversary is that the lasting ecological damage from the spill that was originally feared has not happened. The dire predictions by the media and the major environmental groups proved wildly off base.
Today, the Gulf region affected by the spill is enjoying a renaissance of energy production, booming tourism, and a healthy fishery sector. Scientific data and studies over the past five years show the Gulf environment is returning to its baseline condition. The remnants of the spill are hard to find.
A July 2011 environmental-assessment report from the Coast Guard found that none of the dispersant constituents found in the thousands of water and sediment tests conducted exceeded the EPA’s chronic aquatic benchmarks. Five years later, wildlife populations have proven largely resilient. For instance, commercial-fishery-landings data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) show that, after a drop-off in the year of the spill, catch levels bounced back in 2011 to levels not seen in eleven years, and they remain strong today.
Why has the damage been contained? First, we can be thankful that the vast majority of the 3.2 million barrels of crude leaked into the Gulf dispersed naturally, evaporating into thin air or biodegrading. Microbes, which already feast on the up to 1.4 million barrels of oil that scientists estimate seep naturally into the Gulf each year, increased in number following the spill — aiding the process greatly.
The massive, $14 billion human clean-up response, with 100,000 personnel, 6,508 vessels, and 13.5 million feet of containment boom was unprecedented and effective. Dispersants successfully assisted natural dissolution.
Some of the apocalyptic estimates of damage proved to be mere propaganda. The National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) predicted at the time that oil would enter the “loop current” and reach Florida’s Atlantic coast within a week. Synte Peacock, an NCAR scientist, warned that “the scope of this environmental disaster is likely to reach far beyond Florida.” Not to be outdone, CNN meteorologist Chad Myers breathlessly reported that “there will be tar balls all the way up the East Coast, all the way to Europe.”
But the oil didn’t make it to Tampa, let alone Europe, as the requisite combination of winds and current failed to materialize. By the end of July 2010, NOAA administrator Jane Lubchenco admitted that, “for southern Florida, the Florida Keys, and the Eastern Seaboard, the coast remains clear.”
And what of the long-term effects on the fishing and shrimping industries? The Southern Shrimp Alliance’s Jon Williams predicted the spill could last 40 years. CBS News Network’s Melanie Warner suggested that “this could mean a permanent end” to the Gulf’s seafood industry and that, “ten years from now . . . there will very likely still be seafood — shrimp, bluefin tuna, and maybe snapper and grouper — that are contaminated with BP’s oil.” Not to be outdone on the contamination concerns, CNN correspondent David Mattingly worried about the “cascading effect on the entire food chain” from the spill.
And yet, less than four months after the spill stopped, the director of NOAA’s Sustainable Fisheries Science Center reported that “it appears so far that the impact on the larval population is relatively small.” Data from NOAA confirm that post-spill Gulf fish populations are robust and that commercial seafood landings have generally been consistent with pre-spill ranges. And more than 10,000 government tests show that the seafood is safe to eat.
Audubon Society director Gregory Butcher warned that the spill “could be the strikeout punch” for Louisiana’s state bird, the brown pelican. And Cecilia Riley, executive director of the Gulf Coast Bird Observatory, cautioned: “The disruption of the food web and lack of adequate food supplies could reduce avian productivity for several years.”
But in fact, Louisiana’s brown-pelican population was still strong just a year after the spill, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
The spill was predicted to have long-term negative effects on tourism as well. The managing director of Oxford Economics USA opined, “History and current trends indicate a potential $22.7 billion economic loss to the travel economies of the Gulf Coast states over the next three years.”
In actuality, tourists have flocked to the Gulf every year since the spill, shattering records the summer immediately following the disaster in numerous locales, including Panama City and the Emerald Coast.
Big Green has tried to capitalize on the BP spill as the reason to block any further offshore drilling. And while there are critical caution signals from the accident, what is needed most is rational offsetting of the costs against tens of billions of dollars in benefits, including hundreds of thousands of jobs, energy security, and community development.
Most in the environmental movement portray the ecology of our planet as fragile and weak. But the real story of horrific accidents like the BP oil spill, and natural ecological occurrences like Hurricane Katrina, is that Mother Nature adapts — and she has awesome healing powers.
The Gulf recovery has been swift and impressive and the doomsayers were wrong. When something like this happens, we should heed to the sage advice of the world’s most famous lawgiver, Moses, who warned us of false prophets: “If the thing does not come about or come true#…#the prophet has spoken it presumptuously; you shall not be afraid of him” (Deut. 18:22). Good advice, when it comes to the Green-movement prophets of doom.
– Stephen Moore is a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation and an NRO contributor. Joel Griffith is a Heritage research associate.
It always does, given time.
There was an article on FB this morning about drilling off of SC and several people from the gulf coast commented on how bad things still are there. Who to believe?
Oil is “organic”, afterall!
It could have been a lot worse, that’s for sure.
They were probably trolls paid by the Sierra Club.
Earth always has had a certain quantity of crude oil leaks and has also had ways of dealing with the consequences besides just rolling over and dying.
And a very short time.
Idiots are incapable of comprehending that earthquakes release petroleum from under the sea even when humans aren’t drilling. There is an ecosystem of creatures that consume it.
Read “Two Years Before The Mast”. In it you have a sailing ship running into what is clearly a patch of oil. Before the industrial revolution was fully underway.
The BP spill was a tiny little drop compared to what Sadam Hussein pumped into the Persian Gulf. No frantic, hand wringing effort was mounted to clean up the Persian Gulf, but in a few years it was fully recovered.
You’ll find plenty of greenies to tell you how horrible things really are. The only solution is to give them total power over your life and all of your money.
To this day attorneys are trying to find plaintiffs who will claim they were harmed by the spill. I received a letter yesterday informing me that I must file a claim immediately to receive the tens of thousands set aside for my benefit. Truth is, I cannot discern any harm from the spill. My business grew during that time and has continued to do so.
Liberals still complain about the damage done by the Embridge pipeline break here in Michigan in 2010.
In reality they got a lucky break with a very warm winter which promoted the growth of natural oil eating microbes. Also the dams along the Kalamazoo river that the liberals want torn out prevented the oil from rushing downstream to lake Michigan in a day or two.
There are still spots were a little oil may be found in the soil but in a few more years those will be gone too. Lots of natural seeps in southern Michigan anyway.
Commercial over-fishing relented for a few years and stocks of every critter have rebounded from that. The oil spill gave them the opportunity to not be over-fished or harvested. Plenty to eat. Plenty to mate. Plenty result.
Can you really say that Nature healed itself and there was no damage when thousands of people worked for years to mitigate the effects? I’m certain that no one believes that the conditions would be as well improved as they are now without proactive intervention.
Hey, oil is natural and organic. Why is that bad.
So were the Pigford farmers. Far more got handouts than should have.
It has been shown time and time again that many of the methods used to “intervene” in an oil spill actually aggravate and harm the environment.
Gaia may not recover as quickly as we want, but when we get involved with pressure washers, detergents, hot water, dispersants, etc. we manage to practically destroy the entire eco-system in the process.
On the “surface” it looks good because you can’t see oil any more, but the reality is that we have actually caused more harm than good in the long run.
http://phys.org/news/2012-11-gulf-mexico-clean-up-times-toxic.html
http://www.bioworldusa.com/environmental/oil-spill-cleanup
http://www.zdnet.com/article/whats-the-best-way-to-clean-up-the-oil-spill-in-the-gulf/
http://www.conservationinstitute.org/oil-spill-cleanup-methods-how-do-you-clean-up-an-oil-spill/ (biological agents)
http://phys.org/news/2011-01-materials-oil-clean-up.html
http://blog.ted.com/the_oil_spills_1/
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2943/did-nature-clean-up-most-of-the-exxon-valdez-oil-spill
Oil is a natural mineral in the ocean and most likely spills stimulate fisheries.
Pray America is waking
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
