Posted on 04/10/2015 11:14:32 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The same mainstream media that regularly gives tongue baths to Barack Obama is currently coordinating a narrative around Republican Senator Rand Paul’s temperament. Earlier this week, NBC’s Chuck Todd and the Washington Post’s Chris Cillizza denigrated their female colleagues by suggesting Paul needs to be nicer to them. This line of attack paints Paul as both a sexist and temperamental. Friday, The Guardian tried to join this Ready-For-Hillary pile on but was caught lying.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Even if the lights hadn’t gone out, the man was already hinting at Paul walking out and ending the interview because he didn’t want to answer a question that had not even been spoken yet. DUMB liars.
Leftists lie.
That is called an “axiom”.
Every Republican candidate - EVERY ONE - need to implement a policy of videotaping every interview with their own equipment. No exceptions. As long as the democrat press maintains control of the electronic property, they will control the narrative.
And since when are we not surprised at liberal media lying???
Paul took one last question then left. Tempest in a Tea pot.
oooh, the Guardian.
They wouldn’t want Rand Paul to break out, now, would they? He would undoubtedly wrap our Constitution around there head and jerk our national treasure from under their feet and remove our military safety bubble from around their persons and cancel our participation at their socialist dinner tables.
It is a shame we are falling for the “nudge” already. The R Party and the Left and the outright Marxists want us rubes to devour our own field. The earlier they get us to do it, the better.
The longer we can keep our deep bench up and running, the media can not possibly beat down our field, UNLESS, they can set us up for being nudged into doing the dirty work for the Republican Party, and indirectly for the Democrat Party, for Hillary. LIKE THEY DID LAST TIME.
I am going to be seen defending Paul and Walker and Carson and certainly Cruz on FR. I am for TED CRUZ, but I am not going to shove him down everybody’s throat and alienate supporters of other candidates. If Cruz can beat the machines and pull off the nomination, AND then expand our base in a general election, he can win the presidency. But, meanwhile, it is wayyyy to early (IMHO) to be bashing up the quirky Rand Paul and THE nationally undeveloped Scott Walker and the Hillary gunner, Carly Fiorina, and dear Dr. Carson and bombastic Christy.
I think Cruz is such a class act. I believe he may believe that with his best and most honest effort, that Providence will place him where Providence wishes him to be, and alienating the electorate among ourselves is not something he would want us to be doing, or wanting us to think even helps him. It does not, in the end.
The field needs to stay strong for surely a year or more, and Rand Paul is thankfully, attracting LOTS of moderates, Dems, Libertarians and even ultra conservatives. It has to be hurting Hillary, but it’s not hurting our conservative field, because the Paul agenda doesn’t compete against the message of CRUZ, at all. At least, not this early.
Nearly everyone likes some of what Rand Paul has to say, and some like ALL of what he has to say. THAT is a good thing to go with against Hillary. Our nominee will have to get those votes away from Hillary, in the same way Rand has.
We should defend our field and not get sucked into doing the bidding of destroying them for the dark forces.
Paul is such an idiot, first he comes out with this comment
see an America where criminal justice is applied equally and any law that disproportionately incarcerates people of color is repealed.
Then he gives two answers to Hannity wanting both sides on immigration, abortion, homosexual agenda, religious law in IN, reduced military, Iran talks.
The he goes on to say Iran is not a threat and now tries to back away from it.
then it tells the media outlets to stop running an AD with him saying Iran is not a threat.
All that confusion on his stand on things - no wonder his first name is last! (Hmmmm. Cause or effect?)
Absolutely correct! I don’t understand why it isn’t being done more already.
BTW, there are many “subtle” ways for interviewers to lie. For instance, TV interviews are often shot with one camera (especially when “on location”). The camera is pointed at the subject of the interview. Then, after the interview is complete, the camera is turned on to the interviewer for a series of “reaction shots”. These reaction shots are supposed to match the body language of the interviewer, while the interview took place. That would be the honest way to do things. However, it’s easy to substitute (say) an expression of shock, or derision for the expressions of “rapt attention” or “concern and empathy” that the interviewer was feigning during the interview. (Or vice versa). That would be an example of lying via the reaction shots. Point a (second) camera at the interviewer throughout. If the reaction shots don’t match the interviewer’s actual body language during the interview; you could publish a split-screen comparison on YouTube, and let everyone in on the interviewers sneakiness. That might keep them honest.
What the MSM is confirming is that female reporters are inferior to male reporters in that they do not have what it takes to do their jobs. they cannot withstand the pressures of the job especially when interviewing a tough candidate. Those female reporters who complain about what a mean man Rand Paul is should go back in the kitchen and bake cookies.
;yes!! LOL you are so right!
I’d like to see a Cruz/Walker ticket.
Why is any Republican talking to The Guardian? The most anti-American newspaper in the English-speaking world?
Meant to ping you to #10.
I think it is too early (I could be wrong) to catfight and tear down our magnificent field, don’t you? Not that the time won’t come after some things shake out.
Sorry, I meant to ping ya’ here, to #10, but my butterfingers got away from me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.