1 posted on
04/06/2015 9:07:35 AM PDT by
bryan999
To: bryan999
Another listening tour?
I guess she must be aware of how no one wants to hear her speak at all.
2 posted on
04/06/2015 9:11:29 AM PDT by
chris37
(Heartless)
To: bryan999
and won't take the Democratic Party's nomination for granted...other wannabees don't want to end up in a park somewhere
3 posted on
04/06/2015 9:11:58 AM PDT by
Doogle
(( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: bryan999
Small groups with “invitation only” members, limited reporting, using official interfaces to deal with the media, this all adds up to an attempt to totally control the information flow for her campaign.
4 posted on
04/06/2015 9:13:50 AM PDT by
DBrow
To: bryan999
All she has to do is file her papers and wait for the masses to respond. She is the Anointed One of 2016. No need to campaign even
5 posted on
04/06/2015 9:14:05 AM PDT by
Theodore R.
(Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
To: bryan999
So she’s going to threaten people individually now?
6 posted on
04/06/2015 9:14:08 AM PDT by
Old Yeller
(Civil rights are for civilized people.)
To: bryan999
-soaring speeches to big rallies...?????
![](http://freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/AP822424083292-540x391.jpg)
8 posted on
04/06/2015 9:14:28 AM PDT by
JPG
(Lefty reporters doing battle with Sen. Cruz will continue to be chewed-up and spit-out.)
To: bryan999
...put her in direct contact with voters in states with early primaries or caucuses I guess they're expecting tough primary battles even though she'll be the only one running in them.
To: bryan999
.....is to make Clinton's second run for the White House more about voters and less about herself more about limiting her exposure..
12 posted on
04/06/2015 9:20:21 AM PDT by
Envisioning
(My desire to be well informed is at odds with my desire to remain sane....)
To: bryan999
![photo utZi72R_zpsflatgwbe.gif](http://i816.photobucket.com/albums/zz84/swoosh285/utZi72R_zpsflatgwbe.gif)
More booze at intimate events?
13 posted on
04/06/2015 9:21:25 AM PDT by
FatherofFive
(Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
To: bryan999
make Clinton's second run for the White House more about voters and less about herself... No, but perhaps we can come up with a compromise. Make the second run about neither voters nor Cankles... make her run about scrubbed e-mails. Fitting, as that issue links to her service on the Nixon committee and lost 18 minutes of evidence.
15 posted on
04/06/2015 9:24:01 AM PDT by
C210N
(When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
To: bryan999
will initially focus on intimate events, rather than soaring speeches to big rallies
Translation: She can't fill a high school gymnasium, so she is going to attend some home Tupperware parties.
17 posted on
04/06/2015 9:24:51 AM PDT by
TomGuy
To: bryan999
WOW another listening tour. Why does she feel the need to advertise this crap about how she will engage?
18 posted on
04/06/2015 9:25:23 AM PDT by
1Old Pro
To: bryan999
![](http://images.sodahead.com/polls/002188901/5458405863_ugly_hillary_answer_2_xlarge.jpeg)
Perhaps the dried up old hag Killary is afeared? Keep her events small with invited guests only? Depend on the LSM to do a bang up job of promoting her candidacy?
20 posted on
04/06/2015 9:30:17 AM PDT by
upchuck
(The current Federal Governent is what the Founding Fathers tried to prevent. WAKE UP!! Amendment V.)
To: bryan999
Well, Bill always did like a “hands on” approach to his prospective female voters . . .
22 posted on
04/06/2015 9:31:41 AM PDT by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: bryan999
Imagining “intimate events” with Hilary is worse than my worst nightmare!
23 posted on
04/06/2015 9:32:25 AM PDT by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not A Matter of Opinion)
To: bryan999
If we end up with a choice of Hillary Clinton versus Jeb Bush I would have to say this Country is too far gone to be able to save.
A Bush-Clinton choice would tell me we are still voting for the "lesser of two evils" minus ANY LEADERSHIP that reflects the Constitution or Conservatives.
This is WHY the current "pigs at the trough" are so desperately trying to scuttle Cruz and Walker.
To: bryan999
Another attempt to make Hillary Rodham-Nixon seem personable and “down” with the “common” folk instead of the rich, elitist White snob she is. I’m sure Hillary is looking forward to meeting up with her base, the idiot, low info crowd. She needs to remember to keep the Perrier, the Beluga caviar and the Dom Perignon in the hotel room while she has to “endure” endless meals of burgers, pizza, and soft drinks with her duped supporters.
31 posted on
04/06/2015 10:17:59 AM PDT by
dowcaet
To: bryan999
Announce that you will implement a Student Loan Forgiveness Program if elected. But only for those who can produce proof that they voted.
That’s probably how she will do it.
To: bryan999
By comparison: Ted Cruz identifies himself by a history of words and actions that consistently demonstrate a love of his country and the constitution we’re founded on. Hillary on the other hand, wants your vote to help her reach a personal career goal....
35 posted on
04/06/2015 10:27:56 AM PDT by
Made In The USA
(Yes Ma'am, I said I'd like three sides of bacon with my eggs. and bacon.)
To: bryan999
The goal, according to two people close to the Clinton organization, is to make Clinton's second run for the White House APPEAR TO BE more about voters and less about herself
36 posted on
04/06/2015 10:33:22 AM PDT by
USS Alaska
(Exterminate the terrorist savages, everywhere.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson