Posted on 04/01/2015 4:18:29 AM PDT by Dave346
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday excoriated world powers over their dogged pursuit of a nuclear deal with Iran, pointing to recent statements by officials in Tehran — notably their calls to eliminate Israel — as evidence of the Islamic Republic’s unwillingness to compromise and seek peace in the region.
Yesterday an Iranian general brazenly declared, and I quote, ‘Israel’s destruction is nonnegotiable,'” Netanyahu said, referring to a statement by Mohammad Reza Naqd, the commander of the Basij militia of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards.
“But evidently, giving Iran’s murderous regime a clear path to the bomb is negotiable,” he said. “This is unconscionable.”
Netanyahu’s comments came as diplomats from Iran and a group of six world powers resumed negotiations over the terms of a nuclear deal, hours after a deadline for such a deal elapsed.
He charged that Iran’s actions and ongoing “aggression” across the Middle East proved it did not intend to give up its nuclear and regional ambitions.
“I agree with those who have said that Iran’s claim that its nuclear program is only for peaceful purposes doesn’t square with Iran’s insistence on keeping underground nuclear facilities, advanced centrifuges, and a heavy water reactor,” he said. “Nor does it square with Iran’s insistence on developing ICBMs [Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles], and its refusal to come clean with the International Atomic Energy Agency on its past weaponization efforts.
“At the same time, Iran is accelerating its campaign of terror, subjugation and conquest throughout the region, most recently in Yemen,” he continued.
The prime minister claimed that “the concessions offered to Iran in Lausanne would ensure a bad deal that would endanger Israel, the Middle East and the peace of the world,” and called on the international community “to insist on a better deal… which would significantly roll back Iran’s nuclear infrastructure” and “link the eventual lifting of the restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program to a change in Iran’s behavior.”
He called on world powers to ensure that Iran “stop its aggression in the region, stop its terrorism throughout the world, and stop its threats to annihilate Israel.”
“That should be nonnegotiable. And that’s the deal that the world powers must insist upon,” he concluded.
The negotiators resumed talks in the Swiss resort town of Lausanne Wednesday, just hours after abandoning a March 31 deadline to reach the outline of a deal and agreeing to press on. However, as the discussions dragged on, three of the six foreign ministers involved left the talks, and prospects for agreement remained uncertain.
Claiming enough progress had been made to warrant an extension after six days of intense bartering, and eager to avoid a collapse in the discussions, US Secretary of State John Kerry and his British and German counterparts huddled in Lausanne to continue a marathon effort to bridge still significant gaps and hammer out details of a framework accord.
The foreign ministers of China, France and Russia all departed Lausanne overnight, although the significance of their absence, particularly when the broader group meets with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammed Javad Zarif, was not clear.
If they succeed, those understandings would form the basis for a comprehensive detailed agreement to be reached by the end of June.
After the talks last broke in the early hours of Wednesday, Zarif said solutions to many of the problems had been found and that documents attesting to that would soon be drafted. Other officials were more skeptical.
Asked how high the chances of success were, German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said: “I cannot say.” And British Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond said Iran might still not be ready to accept what is on the table.
“I’m optimistic that we will make further progress this morning but it does mean the Iranians being willing to meet us where there are still issues to deal with,” Hammond told British reporters. “Fingers crossed and we’ll hope to get there during the course of the day.”
Although the Chinese, French and Russian ministers left their deputies in charge, Kerry postponed his planned Tuesday departure to stay in Lausanne, and an Iranian negotiator said his team would stay “as long as necessary” to clear the remaining hurdles.
Officials say their intention is to produce a joint statement outlining general political commitments to resolving concerns about Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief, and their intention to begin a new phase of negotiations to get to that point. In addition, they are trying to fashion other documents that would lay out in more detail the steps they must take by June 30 to meet those goals.
The additional documents would allow the sides to make the case that the next round of talks will not simply be a continuation of negotiations that have already been twice extended since an interim agreement between Iran, the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany was concluded in November 2013. President Barack Obama and other leaders, including Iran’s, have said they are not interested in a third extension.
But if the parties agree only to a broad framework that leaves key details unresolved, Obama can expect stiff opposition at home from members of Congress who want to move forward with new, stiffer Iran sanctions. Lawmakers had agreed to hold off on such a measure through March while the parties negotiated. The White House says new sanctions would scuttle further diplomatic efforts to contain Iran’s nuclear work and possibly lead Israel to act on threats to use military force to accomplish that goal.
And despite the progress that diplomats said merited the extension of talks into Wednesday, officials said the differences notably included issues over uranium enrichment, the status of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpiles, limits on Iran’s nuclear research and development, and the timing and scope of sanctions relief.
The US and its negotiating partners are demanding curbs on Iranian nuclear activities that could be used to make weapons, and they say any agreement must extend the time Tehran would need to produce a weapon from the present several months to at least a year. The Iranians deny such military intentions, but they are negotiating with the aim that a deal will end sanctions on their economy.
While calling on the world to ensure Iran stop its aggression in the region, can't Israel also join the Arab coalition fighting in Yemen?
Couldn't this help cement Israel's position as an important ally in the Middle East AND put some action behind Netanyahu's words?
Does anyone know if it is true that when questioned whether a deal can be done with Iran, John Kerry said, “Allah willing”
I guess that the House of Saud and its other Sunni allies can't afford to be seen publicly fighting alongside the evil Joooos.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Netanyahu, Boehner meet in Jerusalem
Tomorrow at noon: Netanyahu and Boehner give statements to the press in Jerusalem (5am EDT)
Bibi should target anyone in Iran who says that destruction of Israel is non-negotiable. Take out those who even talk to such fools.
Because the world (especially the current Administration) doesn’t disagree on the goal, only on the means.
Fox News reported it yesterday.
Widely reported but I don’t think there’s a
recording.
‘Inshallah’ would be a direct translation of ‘God willing’ as used frequently by Christians and Jews. Kerry was probably thinking ‘s’il plaît à Dieu’ and trying to impress a muzzie. On FR and in some other circles, the term ‘Allah’ ignites flame wars.
If Iran had said the annihilation of France was non-negotiable these Nations would be appalled and these talks would be shut down immediately and it would be on the news 24/7 how it’s impossible to negotiate with a nation so evil as Iran.
Just goes to show you how many National leaders, media outlets, and citizens are anti semetic.
This is a real shame (to put it mildly) How does Israel ever integrate itself into the Middle East as a trusted partner in the region?
Slowly and quietly. :-)
Seriously, if there hadn't been a constant barrage of "peace plans", "peace travelers", and "international aid money" from the West (mainly the US and EU) Israel would have a much better chance to integrate in the region. The Israelis know how to make deals with its neighbours. It is a harsh environment, and often one thing is said publicly and another done in secrecy, but most Israelis are able to cope with that. No, the problem is that Israel's Arab neighbours don't have to deal with Israel, but instead deal with the diplomats from the US, UK, France, Sweden etc. In most case totally ignorant about the local culture, and how to negotiate a deal. Just look at Kerry et al and the nuclear talks with Iran. Does anyone believe that the Iranians don't know that for Obama and Kerry it is much more important to get a deal, any deal, than to accomplish the goal of keeping Iran nuclear free? Does anyone really believe that Iran is not going to use that knowledge to its utmost limit?
No, if the "peace makers" would leave the Mid East alone for a decade or so, it is not unlikely that Israel would be able to make a de facto or maybe even de jure peace with the surrounding countries.
He is only circumspect in his actions to the extent that it would cause a great rift in the Democrat Party if his true motives became widely known.
Jumping between rabid dogs fighting only gets you bit, kill one and the other will then concentrate on you. This is the truth of Islamic politics, and is why having buffons like Kerry negotiate nuclear weapons with radicald will get many Americans killed.
There is a very high price to be paid to abandon morality to others. America traded personal responsibility for individualized morality so that every man could do what is right in his own eyes. The exact description of the state of the world int the time of Noah, right before the flood.
Corruption and wickedness is called freedom now, but it is a self correcting problem, just like heroin.
#2 Israel is already fighting on all fronts as the peaceful arabs are attacking the country every day.
Israel is just another sacrifice to the goal of one world govt run by the oligharchy....
“an Iranian negotiator said his team would stay “as long as necessary” to clear the remaining hurdles.”
I had to scoff at this quote from story. Of COURSE the Iranians will stay “as long as necessary”. Who would ever leave a poker game if they won every hand? if every day you get another significant concession? and you just sit there throwing out “take backs” and watch them squirm.
What if Chamberlain had still signed in agreement with Hitler, while Hitler was claiming he was going to invade Poland ? That is how stupid our leaders are right now.
Where does one buy iodine tablets? I smell radioactivity in the air.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.