Posted on 03/26/2015 4:24:13 PM PDT by xzins
LAUSSANE, Switzerland—The Obama administration is giving in to Iranian demands about the scope of its nuclear program as negotiators work to finalize a framework agreement in the coming days, according to sources familiar with the administration’s position in the negotiations.
U.S. negotiators are said to have given up ground on demands that Iran be forced to disclose the full range of its nuclear activities at the outset of a nuclear deal, a concession experts say would gut the verification the Obama administration has vowed would stand as the crux of a deal with Iran.
Until recently, the Obama administration had maintained that it would guarantee oversight on Tehran’s program well into the future, and that it would take the necessary steps to ensure that oversight would be effective. The issue has now emerged as a key sticking point in the talks.
Concern from sources familiar with U.S. concessions in the talks comes amid reports that Iran could be permitted to continue running nuclear centrifuges at an underground site once suspected of housing illicit activities.
This type of concession would allow Iran to continue work related to its nuclear weapons program, even under the eye of international inspectors. If Iran removes inspectors—as it has in the past—it would be left with a nuclear infrastructure immune from a strike by Western forces.
“Once again, in the face of Iran’s intransigence, the U.S. is leading an effort to cave even more toward Iran—this time by whitewashing Tehran’s decades of lying about nuclear weapons work and current lack of cooperation with the [International Atomic Energy Agency],” said one Western source briefed on the talks but who was not permitted to speak on record.
With the White House pressing to finalize a deal, U.S. diplomats have moved further away from their demands that Iran be subjected to oversight over its nuclear infrastructure.
“Instead of ensuring that Iran answers all the outstanding questions about the past and current military dimensions of their nuclear work in order to obtain sanctions relief, the U.S. is now revising down what they need to do,” said the source. “That is a terrible mistake—if we don’t have a baseline to judge their past work, we can’t tell if they are cheating in the future, and if they won’t answer now, before getting rewarded, why would they come clean in the future?”
The United States is now willing to let Iran keep many of its most controversial military sites closed to inspectors until international sanctions pressure has been lifted, according to sources.
This scenario has been criticized by nuclear experts, including David Albright, founder and president of the Institute for Science and International Security.
Albright told Congress in November that “a prerequisite for any comprehensive agreement is for the IAEA to know when Iran sought nuclear weapons, how far it got, what types it sought to develop, and how and where it did this work.”
“The IAEA needs a good baseline of Iran’s military nuclear activities, including the manufacturing of equipment for the program and any weaponization related studies, equipment, and locations,” Albright said.
One policy expert familiar with the concessions told the Washington Free Beacon that it would be difficult for the administration to justify greater concessions given the centrality of this issue in the broader debate.
“The Obama administration has gone all-in on the importance of verification,” said the source, who asked for anonymity because the administration has been known to retaliate against critics in the policy community. “But without knowing what the Iranians have it’s impossible for the IAEA to verify that they’ve given it up.”
A lesser emphasis is also being placed on Iran coming clean about its past efforts to build nuclear weapons. The Islamic Republic continues to stall United Nations efforts to determine the extent of its past weapons work, according to the Wall Street Journal.
By placing disclosure of Iran’s past military efforts on the back burner, the administration could harm the ability of outside inspectors to take full inventory of Iran’s nuclear know-how, according to sources familiar with the situation.
It also could jeopardize efforts to keep Iran at least one year away from building a bomb, sources said.
On the diplomatic front, greater concessions are fueling fears among U.S. allies that Iran will emerge from the negations as a stronger regional power.
“Instead of ensuring that Iran answers all the outstanding questions about the past and current military dimensions of their nuclear work in order to obtain sanctions relief, the U.S. is now revising down what they need to do,” said the source. “That is a terrible mistake—if we don’t have a baseline to judge their past work, we can’t tell if they are cheating in the future, and if they won’t answer now, before getting rewarded, why would they come clean in the future?”
Iranian demands:
We get to make nuclear bombs
We get to bomb Israel
We get to bomb America
obama and Kerry: Ok
Our gutless Imam in Chief has gutted verification.
What else would you expect from a man child community organizer who sees him for what he is? He couldnt even negotiate extra mayo for a cheeseburger
Look ... Iran is a very, very powerful country. We really have no choice. We must do as they say, and just hope that that they choose not to invade us, rape our women and enslave our men.
[spit]
Iran’s underground nuke sites need to be bathed in radiation and rendered uninhabitable.
This is as good a deal as trading 5 Taliban commanders for one defector!
And you WONDER why the Saudi’s launched a massive attack on Yemen without informing the Obamunists?
Because, as McCain noted this afternoon, (and CNN has YET to mention, by the way),
“The Saudi’s think Obama is on Iran’s side...”
This is all just a charade run by Obama to give Iran the time to finish the bomb and marry it to missiles that can destroy Israel and dominate all of the Arab states.
That will not happen with Obama at the controls.
It’s up to Netanyahu or a new administration.
With insiders saying that Obama will accept no baseline, then where is the reason for Iran to stop any program?
Every action Obama takes promotes the interests of the radical Islamists and demotes American security.
Seems obvious to me that there’s a radical Muslim living in the White House.
They may be on to something.
Would it be easier to just ship some bombs directly ?
FUBO!
Absolutely. The best take on this is that Obama is on Iran's side and not on America's.
Why give all these advantages to a Theocracy?
Better yet;
Why does this Theocracy want all these advantages?
The Saudi's think correctly.
More aid and comfort to the enemy by the Imam-in-Chief.
And still Congress does................................................................................... (now let’s not always see the same hands).
Nothing left to deter Iran form completely it’s efforts to have nukes.... except Israel.
Israel bombs Iran .... Iran responds militarily, maybe with dirty nuke bombs ... full blown war erupts ... Israel is made out to be bad guy and Obama leads world against Israel. Where have I read about this before?
...reports chief US negotiator Ben Dover.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.