DENIERS!
Posted on 03/21/2015 3:09:59 PM PDT by BenLurkin
A new scientific paper has driven yet another nail into the coffin of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming theory. (H/T Bishop Hill)
The paper – Rethinking the lower bound on aerosol radiative forcing by Bjorn Stevens of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg, Germany, published in the American Meteorological Society journal – finds that the effects of aerosols on climate are much smaller than those in almost all the computer models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
(Excerpt) Read more at nation.foxnews.com ...
A paper worth looking up. Thx!
Very true, but remember that you are trying to change the minds of “fence posts”.
The science is SETTLED. No further inquiry into the subject is needed or desired.
Ping.
[[New Climate Paper Gives Global Warming Alarmists ‘One Helluva Beating’]]
NO it hasn’t- climate change LIARS are hell bent on perpetrating the lie of MAN-CAUSED climate change, and no little paper is going to hinder their efforts to scam the world- they will either simply ignore it OR attack the people who wrote it and the public will believe the people who wrote it ‘aren’t really credible scientists’ after the left gets done tearing them apart
Marc Morano’s site climatedepot is chockerblock full of devastating scientific research that SHOULD give global warming alarmists one ‘helluva beating’ yet they simply ignore that site- and attack marc morano- and no one is the wiser
These hard core believers in CC are just another branch of Scientology. They are converting the next generation to their faith.
The science is SETTLED, Global Warming is TOTAL BS.
Stop insulting innocent fencing.
You are correct. The paper should be withdrawn immediately, all copies of the AMS Journal retrieved and burned, the servers hosting the pdf version destroyed, the authors hung, the peers who reviewed the paper sentenced to 20 years hard labor in Siberia, and the editors of the journal stoned to death. There is no other way.
Or PERMITTED! The only people who understand Climate Change can't change a tire, know that traffic signals use pressure pads. They believe in chem trails, black lung from coal trains and that the electricity to recharge a Tesla comes from a wall socket.
...Obama has long warned that sea level rises caused by man-made global warming will make storm surges and flooding worse for coastal communities. In his 2015 State of the Union speech, Obama said “we’ll continue to see rising oceans, longer, hotter heat waves, dangerous droughts and floods
*scratching head*…So since it had little effect back then, it shouldn't be assumed to now?
Or IOW, “That value for that parameter would tend to argue against AGW, so it can’t be right.”
I think it's good..... If more and more papers are published that challenge all of the parameters that the IPCC incorporates as positive feedback, the models will slowly fall apart.
At this point, anything moving the models in the correct (ie. True) direction is good. Destroy the models one parameter at a time...:^)
It won’t make one damn bit of difference to Congress or lawmakers because they have created one hell of a money making scheme that can be milked 90 ways to nothing. All they have to do is convince one half of the population that its real to keep the money conveyor belt rolling so they keep fleecing the other half that has to pay for it in higher taxes. Unfortunately its the one half knee-jerk reactionists that are afraid the sky is falling that have no common sense that votes to keep them in power.
A new paper but not the first paper to debunk radiative forcing.
Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide - Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts? By Timothy Ball
No Smoking Hot Spot (The Australian)
Those two articles take Greenhouse Theory at face value and by the criterion set up in the theory itself finds no evidence of warming on the basis of greenhouse effect.
Sky-high hole blown in AGW theory?
"Forbes reports on a peer-reviewed study that uses NASA data to show that the effects of carbon-based warming have been significantly exaggerated. In fact, much of the heat goes out into space rather than stay trapped in the atmosphere, an outcome that started long before AGW alarmists predicted:"
That article explains why no Hot Spot has been found.
The Hidden Flaw in Greenhouse Theory
Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics
Harvard astrophysicist dismisses AGW theory, challenges peers to 'take back climate science'
It Is Impossible For A 100 ppm Increase In Atmospheric CO2 Concentration To Cause Global Warming
Simple Chemistry and the Real Greenhouse Effect.
Those five articles each show that Greenhouse Theory has no basis in reality due to a direct conflict with the known laws of physics. No wonder the smoking gun "hotspot" can't be found.
Based upon Climate Change fanaticism, how much ppms of CO2 would have to be in the atmosphere to raise the Earth’s temperature to the levels it was at when the Vikings farmed Greenland? What is the difference between 400 ppm of CO2, and the levels of CO2 needed to optimize the atmosphere for plant growth? Greenhouses use 1500 ppm.
How many climate scientists does it take to get a prediction right?
What is the global warming scam really about? Scams, especially one as extensive and obsequious as global warming, have to have an end game.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.